Loading...
VIII - CALCULATING SOLID WASTE RATESItem VIII Before determining the annual solid waste charge per resident in CMSD, staff needs to determine the total cost it will take to operate the solid waste program. To do that staff looks at five (5) key expenses, which are described in more details below. 2012 -13 EXPENSES 1. Hauler Rate The hauler rate of $9.1554 was established when the contract was executed with CR &R in 2006. The hauler rate of $9.1554 has remained unchanged since 2006. To determine the annual cost for the hauler, the rate is multiplied by the total CMSD household served, which is estimated at 21,557. The annual hauler cost is calculated below. Household Rate Monthly Cost Annual Cost 21,557 X 9.1554 $197,363 X 12 = $2,368,356 2. Recycling /Disposal Rate The recycling /disposal rate consist of a transfer station fee for recycling, which is set at $41.22 per ton, and half of the landfill tipping fee due to CMSD's 50% diversion requirement. In 2006, the landfill tipping fee was $22.00 a ton so CR &R's disposal fee is $11.00. When you add the recycling and disposal fees together you get a rate of $52.22 a ton. This rate has remained unchanged since 2006. Note: The current tipping fee is $31.37 a ton, so half of this fee is $15.68, which means the actual recycling /disposal rate should be $56.90. To determine the annual recycling /disposal cost, the rate is multiplied by the estimated total tonnage, which is 40,215 tons (the actual tonnage in 2011 -12 was 39,717 tons). The annual recycling /disposal cost is calculated below. Tonnage Rate Annual Cost 40,215 X 52.22 $2,100,027 3. Salaries and Benefits The projected expenses for salaries and benefits is $469,520 4. Operations and Maintenance O &M consist of professional services, legal services, election costs, tools and equipment, building maintenance, postage, etc. The projected expense for O &M is $284,550. 5. Programs This expense consists of CMSD special programs such as sharps, HHW, scavenging, education, pharmaceutical and telephone book recycling. The projected expense for Programs is $95,000. When you add these five (5) expenses together you get a total of $5,317,453, as shown below. Hauler 2,368,356 Recycling /Disposal 2,100,027 Salaries & Benefits 469,520 O &M 284,550 Programs 95,000 TOTAL: $5,317,453 2012 -13 REVENUES Before calculating the annual charge, staff looks at other revenue sources to help offset the expenses identified above. Other revenue sources include additional container charge, property taxes, investment earnings and CR &R contributions such as education programs and scavenging. The estimated revenue from these sources is identified below. Additional Container Charge 96,000 Property Taxes 150,000 Investment Earnings 50,000 CR &R Contributions 25,000 TOTAL: $321,000 When these revenues are used to offset the total expenses the net cost is $4,996,453 as shown below. 5,317,453 — 321,000 = 4,996,453 CMSD needs to calculate a rate that will generate enough revenue to cover the net expense of $4,996,453. To do that you simply divide the net rate with the total household as shown below. 4,996,453 - 21,557 = 231.78 - 12 = $19.31 The monthly rate of $19.31 needs to be established to cover all the expenses in the solid waste program. However, the Board approved a rate of $19.00 a month. When you multiply the $19.00 rate with the total household of 21,557, the District will generate 4,914,996 in revenues, but this will not be enough to cover the projected net expenses of 4,996,453 as shown below. 4,914,996 — 4,996,453 = (81,457) As you know, this loss will be made up by using the District's Solid Waste Fund Balance. CONCLUSION The rate of 19.95 a month was established because at the time of contract negotiations between staff and CR &R in 2005 -06, the economy was strong, which means people were buying more products that would result in large volume of trash generation. At the time the contract was executed, staff and CR &R were projecting to collect 46,340 tons of refuse in 2006 -07. They were also projecting 21,945 households will be serviced in 2006. It is safe to say that the projections were way off. The actual tonnage collected in 2006- 07 was 42,585.75 and the tonnage has been decreasing ever since, with the exception of a small spike in 2010 -11 as shown below. Actual Tonnaae 2006 -07 42,585.75 2007 -08 42,268.82 2008 -09 40,908.11 2009 -10 40,374.03 2010 -11 40,865.63 2011 -12 39,717.00 The less tonnage means the actual cost will be less than originally forecasted. When staff and CR &R were projecting 46,340 tons in 2006 it also meant the District will be spending $2,419,876 in recycling /disposal costs. However the actual costs are shown below. Actual Tonnaae 2006 -07 $2,223,828 2007 -08 2,207,278 2008 -09 2,136,221 2009 -10 2,108,332 2010 -11 2,134,003 2011 -12 2,074,022 Even though the actual tonnage and expenditures were less than originally forecasted, the District never made adjustments in the solid waste rate. For the past six years, the rate remained at $19.95 a month, which meant a surplus in the solid waste budget at the end of the fiscal year and the surplus is the contributing factor to the substantial amount in the Solid Waste Fund Balance. Earlier in this report it was mentioned that the tipping at the landfill is now $31.37 per ton. When the contract was executed with CR &R in 2006, the tipping fee was $22.00 per ton. CR &R has not requested a pass through in the rate to recoup their costs from the landfill tipping fee increasing. If the Board had approved such a pass through the recycling /disposal cost will be $56.90 per ton. If this rate is applied to the 2012 -13 expenditure plan, assuming all other expenditures remain the same, the District would have to establish a rate of $20.04 a month to generate enough revenue for the expenditures. With the $19.00 a month rate just approved by the Board, the projected loss would be ($269,663) if the recycling /disposal rate was set at $56.90.