Loading...
Minutes - Board - 1954-09-02 (2)Present: Memo of conference between members of governing bodiee of City of Costa Mesa, Costa Mesa Sanitary District, and repre- sentatives of Orange County, held at 2057 (rear) Newport Avenue, Costa Mesa, California, September 2nd, 1954. City of Costa Mesa: Councilman - Mayor C.M.Nelson " C.W.TeWinkle It Bruce Martin " Bert Smith " A. L. Pinkley City Attorney Don Dungan City Manager Geo.W.Coffey COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT: • Director - President Director Director Director Director Attorney Engineer Secretary COUNTY OF ORANGE: Supervisor County Counsel - C.W.TeWinkle C.• M. Nelson Wm. E. Lord H. Paul Norman Arthur H. Meyers Leroy P. Anderson Robert Bulot F B. Owen . Heinz Kaiser Joel Ogle President TeWinkle of Sanitary District presiding called meeting to order at 8:45 p.m. City Attorney Dungan read in completeness a "draft" of proposed Agreement between the City and District and County and the matter was open for discussion or comment. County Counsel Ogle in commenting on the proposed Agreement indicated his views to the effect that the County was not necessarily a party to such agreement. o: • • City Attorney Dungan stated that they did not want to leave the County "out" in case it wanted to be "in ", to which Mr.Ogle replied "Well, we don't want to be ' in' . How- ever, we (the County) will'co- operate 100% in whatever you gentlemen want to do, but don't see where the Joint.Exercise of Power Act ties the County, in. Dungan - we would from our standpoint be glad to leave you out. Ogle - Satisfied with whatever you.- the City does. Attorney Leroy Anderson expressed the opinion that a contract in present form would vest full powers in the City so far as the District is concerned and result in "killing" any pending bond proposals and preventing such,future pro -- r' posals by,the District. Further discussion and a poll of the Directors of the Sanitary District resul�ed in the following tentative con- elusions and action: Favorable expression by each member District Board on adoption of thel'proposalo Exclusion of County as a a to contract. • Refferral by both City and 'y governing bodies to their attorneys of the matter of preparing contract and report back Septemlx r 16th. 11