Agenda Packets - Recycling - 2011-04-25 COSTA MESA SANI'FARYDISIJUCT
RECYCLING COMN41'171,"E`E,,�
AGENDA
onday,A mtil 2 , ` X141 - 10:30 ,A.:m.
Costa esa Saanitaty District
6128 W o, 19,1, Staeet
(Dir °t.ttmtt Fitzpatrick and President oten)
. .11 Ditectors are webt:orne.
I. CY2011 Recychng Cont uutix' ee G'm»uls
Review CY 201 1. Goals
11. Waste Diversion Repo — March 2011
0 t"date on liow CIISD is meeting AB 939 goals
Ill. Recycffiig Retort--1h. arch 2011
W Special Pti.cing/Green Waste C Bs_-Ovil Report
IV. 1" n inwincr En:f6rcement Officer's Rep,ort
0 Review C'.t: O enforcement activities for tr2sh cans,gt tf t:i and scavenging
V. Scavenging Report
R,6vquv scavenging actinides ueporred to CzPoIItD
Update on the lockable containers—Oral Report
vi. Qdy Public Outreoch Cat1u°ndor
Review upcoming community events
IL Per Cap,ita Disposal Rate
16 Review and discuss report on the States new disposal reporting method
Vill]. Graffiti Abatavauteao 11rci,gnt,aru For Trash Cans
0, Retiiew and discuss CR&R's graffiti abatement program
I.X. Articles of interest
Public Works Online--Cities debut zero-waste izitiatives
San Gabriel Valley't'ribuu.e L.A. '(kni uty g-arbage will be riding the rad
ICI
A-CI 1'I'I I S
Norte
X,1. Thais is the time to receive any comments from members of the public.
Next'6ufeetirug Date— May 23,2011
Datet,l;. April 21,2411
C'let oN�theDistn't
Item No. I.
CY 201 0
Recycling Committee Goals
1, Encourage Non-Profit Origanization,s and Schools 'to impllemznt I cyclinig Projects
and/or Programs
IL Monitor advancements and technology in the ohid waste industry
M. Promote recycling, at community events.
1V EncOUTGg,e Zero Waste pructices amang Residents and Schools
'V. A dvocatie stpstainable Practices toensure pirecilouls resouirces are saved
Vr.r. Implement a Community Awareness Program emphasizing District pro grarns and
,special events
Item No. II.
CR Transfer
To: Joan Revak
From: CR Transfer Inc.
Jurisdiction: Costa Mesa Sanitary District(9)
MonthNear: Mar-11
Recycling Report
Recycle Tons
Commodity Percentage Recycled
Newspaper 9.61% 315.14
Cardboard 7.38% 241.99
Mixed Paper 12.53% 410.82
Glass 4.17% 136.82
PET 0.95% 30.98
HDPE 0.84% 27.41
Aluminum Cans 0.27% 8.94
Metal 0.68% 22.32
Tin 1.82% 59.57
Greenwaste 10.10% 331.17
Wood 3.01% 98.72
Mixed Plastics 2.77% 90.83
Totals 54.14% 1774.72
County&
Newport Bch Total
Total Tonnage 3277.77 235.331 3513.10
Rec c[ed Tonnage 1774.72 122.29 1897.01
Landfill Tonnage 1503.05 113.04 1616.09
CR Transfer
To: Joan Revak
From: CR Transfer Inc.
Jurisdiction: Costa Mesa Sanitary District Santa Ana Heights (11)
MonthNear: Mar-11
Recycling Report
Recycle Tons
Commodity Percentage Rec cled
Newspaper 3.91% 9.21
Cardboard 5.58% 13.12
Mixed Paper 9.08% 21.37
Glass 5.41% 12.72
PET 0.82% 1.92
HDPE 1.21% 2.84
Aluminum Cans 0.33% 0.78
Tin 2.12% 4.99
Greenwaste 14.02% 33.00
Wood 5.03% 11.84
Mixed Plastics 4.46% 10.50
Totals 51.97°/a 122.29
Total Tonnage 235.33
Recycled Tonnage 122.29
Landfill Tonnage 113.04
/
o
Uj
/o
ii%
�f
i"t pr
11 j a/
/
'Al
/ % „D I X.
�0 m � `,,
rim //, 111111 '��j
i% dM
�j f IIVV
;T
f f J G/ i
v�o / / u r /
E/
/ii D �/�
9 �,�yf/%r
III v ,
pro J p°I
� �aw;�Offi
UJ
B ;Y'
11 f :
Y. k
v /
a h s
r,
l ' � l
IS
fry
TP tl�
MEN
% o/i
/l
RE
Z%%/ ` {/ /j, ally:
IC:
r R ' �
lim
i
r
% ,
�O��rhA-,�
At
Ifs %/ ap ra
,%
Item No. IV.
..... COST - ES.A-
S
ART(DISTWiCT,
-Memorandum
To: Scott Carroll, General Manager
From: Isidro Gallardo, Ordinance Enforcement Officer
Date: April 18, 2019
Subject: Ordinance Enforcement Report
This report summarizes major points for three ordinance enforcement topics covering
Scavenging, Graffiti, and Trash Container Enforcement.
Scavenging: In the month March, there were no calls to the District HQ to report
scavenging activity. However, there were scavenging incidents observed directly by
the OEO to report.
Areas and times were scavenging was observed by the OEO:
DATE TIME ADDRESSES.
i ..
03/07/2011 9:30am 200-300 Block of Avocado St, 500-700 Block of Joann
St
03/08/2011 7:40am 700 Block of W. 18 St, 700 Block of Shalimar St
03/11/2019 8:45am 3000 Block of Fillmore Way
03/14/2011 7:15am 750 Block of Center St, 1900 Block of Federal Ave
03/15/2011 9:15am 1600-1650 Block of Fullerton Ave
03/21/2011 8:35am 400-500 Block of Bernard St
In the above incidents, the OEO made contact with the offender, took as much
personal information from them as possible (took pictures if able), and gave them a
verbal warning to stop scavenging. Attached are pictures of scavengers observed in
the community.
Graffiti: OEO continues to work with Frank Campos (CR&R) to target areas that need
attention regarding graffiti removal from trash containers. The following addresses
where submitted to Mr. Campos on March 28, 2011: 2000 Blocks of Palace Avenue,
Wallace Avenue, Sterling Avenue, and the 700 Block of W. 20th Street. The area has
Protecting our community's health and the environment by providing solid waste and sewer collection services.
www.crosdca.go v
Ordinance Enforcement Report
April 18, 2011
Page 2 of 3
approximately 35-40 trash containers with graffiti on them. Mr. Campos will notify the
OEO when the trash containers have been serviced by CR&R.
Trash Container Enforcement: In the month of March, there were no calls to the
District HQ to report residents who either store there trash containers in public view or
leave their trash containers out on the street curb well after the trash has been picked
up.
However, increased surveillance was placed on Santa Ana Avenue (between Monte
Vista Avenue and Mesa Drive) and neighboring streets to address several residents
who leave their trash containers out on the street curb well after trash pick-up day.
A summary of the courtesy notice process for the District OEO is provided in the
following chart and demonstrates the effectiveness of a 1sf Notice":
M rCh 'i-37 0'I 1 15t
507
Cou esy
`N+o ce l, tter°
South of Wilson St. 13 1 0
Wilson St. to Adams Ave. 15 5 0
Adams Ave. to Sunflower Ave. 1 7 1 0 1 0
In addition, the General Manager gave me a list of street addresses that are storing
trash cans in public view, which is attached hereto. The list was provided by a resident
in the community. On April 8, 2011 and April 15, 2011, the OEO visited several of the
street addresses on the list and observed twenty locations where trash cans were in
public view. These locations are below:
Royal Palm Dr.: 2944 Ponderosa St.: 1598 & 1609
Myrtlewood St.: 1626 Andros St.: 2908 & 2929
Redwood: Ave.: 2917, 2924, 2964, & 2984 Oahu PL: 1658 & 1654
Sandalwood St.: 1608, 1629, & 1625 Palau PI.: 1617
Primrose St.: 1616
Minorca Dr.: 1633, 1639, & 1640
The residents at the addresses above received a warning notice that was placed on
the lid of their trash cans. OEO will revisit the area on April 22, 2011 ensure
compliance and to also increase surveillance in neighboring streets and the OEO will
report his findings at today's Recycling Committee meetings.
Other: On March 16, 2011, the OEO contacted the Chief Code Enforcement Officer
for the City of Costa Mesa (CM), Willa Bouwens-Killen, to inquire about a ride-along
with a CM Code Enforcement Officer (CEO). Ms. Bouwens-Killen, very
accommodating, paired the District OEO with CM CEO Tim Sun for a ride-along on
March 17, 2011, CEO Tim Sun was very cooperative and shared a wealth knowledge
and expertise about CM and his job duties; knowledge and expertise that proved
Board of Directors
April 18, 2011
Page 3 of 3
beneficial to the District OEO. Mr. Sun shared some tips on how to approach different
complaints or situations out on the field with a safety first mentality; for example, when
making contact with a resident or a scavenger out on the street. He also took the
District OEO on a drive through some of the areas of the city were scavenging is more
common than other areas.
Item No. V.
March 2011 Scavenging CFS
Calls For Service or On Viewed with arrest or citation issued:
Location CAD# -DR;0- RD I Dispo I Date I M9:31:1
439 FAIR DR LPD110327019947 "*11-3516 13 RTFAR 03/27/11
RD 13= 1
3150 HARBOR BLVD *NIA 11-203258 1 20 1 Cl 03/05/11 10:00
RD 20 = 1
W PAULARINO AV&GARFIELD AV LPD110325019491 11-204597 1 21 1 Cl 03/25/11 9:36:10
RD21 = 1
3089 BRISTOL ST N1A 11-203114 1 22 1 Cl 03/01/11 5:27
RD 22 = 1
Total = 4
"Officer initiated call
-Original CFS was reference savenging however the subject had a warrant and was arrested
Calls For Service with no arresticitation:
Location CAD# DR# RD I Dispo JJ Date Time
1850 WHITTIER AVE LPD110317017613 11 1 1 UTL It 03/17/111" 8:09:01
RD 01 = 1
685 W 18TH ST LPD110306015205 1 2 1 GOA 03/06/11 9:28:46
RD02 = 1
1900 WHITTIER AV LPD110314016981 1 8 1 GOA 03/14/11 7:44:50
1989 CONTINENTAL AV LPD110314017018 1 8 1 PAWC 103/14/11110:01:47
RD08= 2
HAMILTON ST&HARBOR BLVD I LPD110321018623 9 1 UTL 03/21/11 10:04:58
RD 09= 1
371 HAMILTON ST LPD110328020168 11 1 GOA 03/28/11 10:17:13
371 HAMILTON ST LPD1 103280202101 1 11 1 GOA 103/28/11113:32:54
RD11 = 2
241 TULANE RD LPD110323019052 1 13 1 UTL 03/23/11 7:24:07
RD13 = 1
1555 E MESA VERDE DR LPD110316017409 1 15 1 PAWC 03/16/11 9:33:55
RD15 = 1
3008 FILLMORE WY LPD110309015851 21 1 GOA 03/09/11 13:23:54
3008 FILLMORE WY LPD110323019134 21 GOA 03/23/11 14:49:08
3008 FILLMORE WY LPD110309015802 21 PAWC 03/09/11 6:53:31
3008 FILLMORE WY LPD110323019037 21 PAWC 03/23/11 4:46:56
3008 FILLMORE WY LPD110323019050 21 PAWC 03/23/11 7:22:08
3008 FILLMORE WY LPD110329020336 21 UTL 03/29/11 7:23:06
RD21 = 6
743 SCHENLEY BAY LPD110307015550 1 22 1 GOA 03/07/11 22:22:22
840 W BAKER ST LPD110302014201 1 22 1 GOA 103/02111112:13:43
RD22 = 2
BROOKLINE LN&VANGUARD WY I LPD110302014158 35 1 UTL 03/02/11 8:57:13
RD35 = 1
Total = 18
Dispo Translation:
CI- Citaiton Issued
UTL- Unable To Locate
GOA- Gone On Arrival
PAWC- Party Advised,Will Comply
Locations are apartment or condo complexes: RTFAR- Report To Follow Arrest
1555 E MESA VERDE DR PINEBROOK VILLAGE
1850 WHITTIER AVE CAMDEN APARTMENTS
439 FAIR DR MED VILLAGE APTS
840 W BAKER ST WOODLAND VILLAGE APTS
743 SCHENLEY BAY Condo Complex
Scavenging CFS March 2011
-P ,�.u�� 1yy
Off
�u � Ni
rrr p
xu� n�
.�
aen„aru,��mr�"a tiuu >t 1 .�119111/�,,rrp,r�y mm�i�+l�l�irrr��x 99� rm i� r� W ��11 w �1 ifir ;
Rr.
19j tl,„„ �� �,.�—!�! ^'� �Y Y �,��aJ + ,.✓""rt9lY h�� +��((IIV� '.P.
3I
x �( �
ho\\ (Y II' I
9roti
4
�.un. ...
O � °
. j r"RiXU� a�dV
NUg ,, kJflu,m `" Jvx� p
...t.,, ._ ....r.� �4�„�U,..�ti g� � �'� ��r vur>,lr�ri irrr«arexs�ertr:,,, Auiee nw➢t'��NV�! �.. � v�'
7 Legend:
Y���� Scavenging CFS 03-11
'I N. �.
��""� LOCATION:
1555 E MESA VERDE DR
�rgrmsrm�swr cBra r�
i � r
�J iriri�nl)�„ ! ��� �""� � 1850 WHITTIERAV
1900 WHITTIERAV
"Ev,i,� � x rlp�mxrm,N�; rrrrim�oi nri mur im iw^irry uau�rrr �a m�
11), IIWAIM1v01 �tq� r�xx x mrwr i rr,,,
1989 CONTINENTAL AV
% 241 TULANE RD
3008 FILLMORE WY
3089 BRISTOL ST
� runwaumr�ai��
... � ,
�w 1 ' 3'150 HARBOR BLVD
371 HAMILTON St
. . . � o
�I 4� ti„ ;t t 439 FAIR DR
L685 rrix„� ms 685 W 18TH ST
r�,
743 SCHENLEY BAY
840 IN BAKER ST
BROOKLINE LN&VANGUARD WY
HAMILTON ST&HARBOR BLVD
W PAULARINOAV&GAREIELD AV
rY,,I yr„ RIQ outline
NO,AX'H
a
d
o°s
a
o`
ooh
�a
rL oo.o
a
0(2•
a
N o0c 1
0
N °z
H
00.
N L..
.Q p.
� T
00.
art
0
N 00,
uy b'
LO o1%)
00.N �
�b
oos
T �
T � 00,
V
b
OO•
oDC
�b
00
'b
002
a0 ti CD l!) ct c7 N r Q 00.
r
W O r
O - r
O O O
N- N N
r,
LO
aQ
o�
�a
p co 94�
co
c�
L T�
L
� n
T�
V
r
(1)
"' ��a6
l
N -
r L
y
ccs
LO O LO o
N 04 �- r
� - � - -- - - - � - - . .
7
ƒ 2 � ® \
EV
2 § f
@ E
C14 c $ \ / 7 /
E
CL
= g
0
I � E �
c / \ / d %
� (
M t ±\ t �
1a
/ /% ƒ 5
REgCO
w / & \ / / 2U-
r / - d- -- -�- . - --- � - - - -- � � -
.
N ' ® cz
. $
L
ƒ
X044
\% \c
< � 0t= o
c / } \ c) C(D
�_ �. . . � . . . .. : _�. . .. . . . ... . . . .. .
>1
7 �
2
¥ �
. a = c
LO C14
} [ \
CO
� &±
} ( * 2 / \Lo ƒ k .
: 2 � ƒ
� § �
� \ 7 3
AA
co
C) ti
f9 r 04
(D
a)
2:
o6 E2
0
L) 0
C) a) 0
to 0 Of C) C14
cc
CD
CD
10
>1
co U')
C)
C)
E cu
E C> -C
0 In >,-o),
C) c S)
100
O 0) U)
0 T 0
E od 0
<0 Ir- O a)
N ir- co
Ep
:;7, 0
cc
_!n _0
:3 E o IL
a) 0- C)
0 w CD
co 2 LO C14 U- C14
VA
1,,n
cn
L
LL
N .-J
f
OD LO
U
r r N
(C
LL
co p I T N
C Cl v^".
CD 0
g Ck
-lz LL „Po
3 (D LL 4"uyy,
F- a) ro of a a
p
N 67UHU � Co M �
OCN
CD
C u
� 3: IMF
LD N M
N J
NtiP
M
rn
Qt
I
U �
i m M.Mi
wok
CO Q tY N a7ik
1 LL
A �
y
I LL S4
2
—i t
CD
LL N
EZ
Si
IM
q
E
CL
M, CIO CL
CL
r=
ML 0
JZ- 1 9 w =I'm b"
V)
0 V) 0
12% E
Co 7u E", 0 0
N 25 2 In C)
u- C)
C: I
CL
CD"S
c" ICU
0
L C6 m LO C\1 y CD 0
c6'
z'=
Q 0 IX IW
I p �b FF
01 0 0 00 1 .0
N I'0 0
E s CD CL=k Q-
c'),
Ei
C' o-
0 0
>1 0 = 0 'r
C)- U)
-�e IT
r= E -25
Ira (y) 0 0 0 0
J -j
C2
E IE
La, LL.
C14 CD
Lr) rj-j IN J
CD
C>
j5
0
CZ
CD cn ............
0- IV LL, U
0 8 -
_0 co
[if EE (1) �0 L0
s C) 0 2 0 0 J
co
C)
ca-
o
0 J-
CL U) M M
E -?5 U" kill
CD O Q
C14 CO 0
E �9 P n A
CL 0
[ O an
Q C j r?
CL
E je Y I Lea EP
ce) C,�3 C7 irk (•
Co U J _J� ! r C) N N
I
(D
w U5
CD
a U) ��. � C CL T dam n'u u
.0 L + 0 S w^
O y, N O tl Lr (0 rnre
LS") U � .�� i t C) s u = r m N ➢
E 'I:S
R "d
W b7 N ..�''
L i G Q r ,IC w: :". "" E
x,la,
D GO LO
f
N - ry C "CIT
a--r F ro 5 C), 85
O mt
yeaj a
r u o o l� N r1 On � r
cq 0 "-ti r U c5l ., r N Cr)
JC
d
F—
OD
81 4 i s CU IM C+') Cl' Q
N 0) _j (h
IC�u w N 0
C4i, s co
.,
�
U
Ln aj N N
r co r N CL' N
i
m CL
Y'3
en m
C CL
CL
E 4�
E
f�
(5, U! i N N
Item No. VII.
COSTA 9YESA S.A.AqTART(D1STRICT
. . . iii pe
Memorandum
To: Recycling Committee
From: Scott Carroll, General Manager1-r "
Date: April 25, 2011
Subject: Per Capita Disposal Rate
Summary
As per direction of Chairman Fitzpatrick, below is an overview of the State's new
disposal reporting method.
Staff Recommendation
That the Recycling Committee receives and files this report
Analysis
In 1989, the State Legislature passed a historic legislation, commonly known as the
California Integrated Waste Management Act (AB 939); requiring local jurisdictions to
divert 50% of their 1990 base-year refuse generation by the year 2000. Jurisdictions
must continue to divert 50% of their refuse in proceeding years of 2000 or face
possible fines of $10,000 a day. To calculate a jurisdiction's diversion rate, the State
used a complicated method that used population, employment and inflation-adjusted
taxable sales to estimate waste generation tons for each measurement year. It was
time consuming and a lengthy process to complete and diversion rates could not be
finalized for several years.
In 2007, the State Legislature passed SIB 1016 that simplified calculating compliance
measurements for AB 939. SIB 1016 accomplishes this by changing to a disposal-
based indicator: the per capita disposal rate, which uses only two factors: a
jurisdiction's population and its disposal as reported by disposal facilities. It creates a
clearer picture of where a jurisdiction stands in their waste reduction efforts, but most
importantly, SIB 1016 makes it easier to see where improvements are needed, and
frees up resources to address those areas.
Trotecting our community's heaftFi and the environment by providing soi'idwaste andsewer collection services,
zarrrrrv.crosdca.gov
Recycling Committee
April 25, 2011
Page 2 of 3
The overall mandate has not changed. What has changed is how each jurisdiction's
progress is measured to reach the 50 percent goal for diverting waste from landfills.
This measurement. is no longer determinative of compliance. An important point to
remember is that if a jurisdiction was at 50 percent under the old system, it is at 50
percent under the new system.
In order for the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) and
jurisdictions to more properly focus on successful program implementation, SB 1016
shifts from the historical emphasis on using calculated generation and estimated
diversion to using annual disposal as a factor when evaluating jurisdictions' program
implementation. Overall benefits of the new approach include:
• Focuses on diversion program implementation
• Increases simplicity and timeliness of goal measurement
• Allows for city, county or regional agency growth
• Saves money and time by eliminating complex calculations
• Increases CIWMB staff field presence
• Adjusts CalRecycle review schedule for cities, counties, and regional agencies.
Costa Mesa has met its diversion goal and is implementing programs in the
CalRecycle 2005-06 Biennial Review, which are now on a four-year CalRecycle
review cycle (over 350 jurisdictions).
In order to shift to this new system, jurisdictions must have a measurement that
translates AB 939's diversion goal into disposal-based language. This is the "50
percent equivalent per capita disposal target" -- the amount of disposal that is
approximately equivalent to a jurisdiction's current 50 percent diversion requirement.
CalRecycle has calculated this target for each jurisdiction. Under the new
measurement system, to meet the 50 percent target, a jurisdiction needs to annually
dispose of an amount equal to or less than its 50 percent equivalent per capita
disposal target.
The new per capita disposal rate approach is not determinative of a jurisdiction's
compliance. CalRecycle will use each jurisdiction's annual per capita disposal as an
indicator in evaluating program implementation. CalRecycle's evaluation will be
focused on how jurisdictions are implementing programs that they chose. The review
of each jurisdiction's compliance will still be on a case-by-case basis. Cities, counties,
and regional agencies will not and cannot be compared to others or to a statewide
average. Each jurisdiction's 50 percent equivalent per capita disposal target is unique
because the target is based upon a jurisdiction's unique base-year generation.
CalRecycle's goal is not only to assist local jurisdictions in the development and
implementation of waste reduction programs, but also to provide assistance when
those programs are not working as they should. If a jurisdiction is not meeting its 50
percent equivalent per capita disposal target, CalRecycle staff will work to help
Recycling Committee
April 25, 2011
Page 3of3
determine why that may be and work with the jurisdiction to make any necessary
program modifications.
The change in measurement does change how a jurisdiction will look at the numbers;
however, the intent remains the same — waste reduction. Under the old system, if a
jurisdiction diverted 50 percent or MORE of its waste, it had met its mandate and was
moving in the right direction. Now, under SB 1016, if a jurisdiction's annual disposal
rate is at or BELOW its 50 percent equivalent per capita disposal target that is a good
thing and is an indicator of program performance. In short, the lower the annual
disposal rate, the less waste we are generating, and thus the better we are doing.
In Costa Mesa, the per capita disposal target is 8.5 Pounds per Day (PPD).
According to the State's website, Costa Mesa is well exceeding the target.
2007 — 6.8 pounds per person per day
2008 — 6.2 pounds per person per day
2009 — 5.1 pounds per person per day
Strategic Element & Goal
This item supports achieving Strategic Element No. 2.0, Solid Waste and Goal No.
2.5, Encouraging zero waste.
Legal Review
Not applicable
Financial Review
Not applicable
Public Notice Process
Copies of this report are on file and will be included with the entire agenda packet for
the April 25, 2011 Recycling Committee regular meeting at District Headquarters and
on the District's website.
Alternative Actions
1. Refer the matter back to staff for more information.
Item VIII.
C E-11SA
,, OSV ,M SA�WVRTOISTRICT'
. . an indipetidetit�,,�pecia(Distyict
Memorandum
To: Recycling Committee
From: Scott Carroll, General Managr �A
Date: April 25, 2011
Subject: Graffiti Abatement Program for Trash Cans
Summary
Staff has been working with CR&R to abate graffiti on trash cans and improve the
appearance of neighborhoods. Some residents have taken upon themselves to spray
paint their home address on the automated cans so that no one else can mistakenly or
intentionally take away the cans. As you can see in the attached pictures, these cans
are unsightly and contribute blight in neighborhoods.
Staff Recommendation
That the Recycling Committee receives and files this report
Analysis
CR&R and the District OEO have teamed up together to eliminate this type of blight.
The program is simple. The OEO will report spray painted trash cans to CR&R that
include the quantity of trash cans along with their street addresses. CR&R will then
stencil the address number on the lid of the trash cans and replace them with the
blighted cans. As seen in the attached pictures the stencil trash containers can be
easily identified by residents while at the same time improves the appearances of
neighborhoods.
Strategic Element & Goal
Not applicable
Legal Review
Not applicable
Troteciing our comrnunity s geafth and the environment by providing solidwaste andsewer co(Cectio77 services.
i, -a,w.crosdca.gov
Recycling Committee
April 25, 2011
Page 2 of 5
Financial Review
There is no cost to the District for this program. All costs are borne by CR&R.
Public Notice Process
Copies of this report are on file and will be included with the entire agenda packet for
the April 25, 2011 Recycling Committee regular meeting at District Headquarters and
on the District's website.
Alternative Actions
1 . Refer the matter back to staff for more information.
Recycling Committee
April 25, 2011
Page 3 of 5
l »
V IIII. y Y
I
I
I �s�
Recycling Committee
April 25, 2011
Page 4 of 5
f f/ff
fff.,
0000000000i i iV1�� � i
i
� Yoh N lar��rutiu��vo�N«�W�
911(
rmll
fff/
min %f i
' ff
Y '
�n I
6
�g
lw �(
r r
Recycling Committee
April 25, 2011
Page 5 of 5
J� l
I /
d,
r,
J;
��� lll,lill
w
lei
t
i
IMAM ° 'iur�Illl�ligff 9b�wr IrfJ/J�Ir''l�r 1 r ,.
i///�,,�//��,✓arrr r `�/� rr�Y �l%�i r1�miNn� ^>�a�w���f������������1 �� s � „rr,.
r a
lr� lrr n
f '�"�� )jl �' �mNy�/y f Ir�ifuuff�I,r
rllri°ri �uv/irllioD�' rrr G��IY� ,.ioU�
RN pl w f
h
Page 1 of 2
Pictures of Scavenging Activities in the Month of April
f11111YY1�1yll�)illl/1111 J1%//%/%i/ z
IN
1
l
i
1 .
/
r
/
1
/
i
�ra«�
t
lire
f
l
/
r
Page 2 of 2
F�
h
m
Ilflyf
i
y /,/, e i,,: ,,, / �i/,:.•, ..o,,,, /i. ';,.,� ,,,,, � i i�/ iii.: // /�//ii%//%/i//i j/�/io.!//
/ iii/ /✓, ��/ . ., �, �,r r�
/������� ��� ///,. /„/ �i2.://ri ,,, ,,, // %,,,,i ,� %,✓/lilt�/cr „% �ii i
��� ,,,,�� /„ / iii � � �.iiii/,,,ii �� ���.;✓/„/„ %i / ��/�i,
r I ��' pp IIIIII,
i 1
gg'%iii %iii;
Page 1 of 2
Trash cans stored in public view
Sunday March 27th 2011 4:00 PM
Street Address
Redwood Ave. 1582
2915
2921
2924
2964
2984
Samar P]. 1650
Andros St. 2929
2964
Bimini PI. 2956
2964
2968
2969
2969
Baker St. 1590
1618
1625
1629
1637
Myrtlewood St. 1582
1626
Jacaranda St. 2977
2921
Primrose St. 1604
1616
Chestnut Ave. 2909
2920
Page 2 of 2
Royal Pala Dr. 3016
Corsica PI. 1527
1574
1585
1589
1652
Sandalwood St. Yes
Gibraltar Ave. 3077
3078
3094
3102
3142
3157
3165
3170
3189
Minorca Dr. 1633
1641
1645
1649
Samar PI. 1650
Public Works Online: Home Page Page 1 of 2
Item No. IX.
Print Page
Infine
................ . .......__ __................. ..... ... ...
Chicago i i icipal pioneers
tackling waste by controffing unwanted it and phione
books
Source: Catalog Choice
Publication date: 2011-03-28
BERKELEY, CALIF.(March 8,2011)—More than 100 billion pieces of unsolicited mail are received by Americans each
year—and municipalities foot the bill for waste collection and disposal. Today, the communities of Chicago, along with those
of Tompkins County(Ithaca), N.Y.; Marion County(Salem), Ore.; Kansas City, Mo.—Kan.; and Berkeley, Calif.,will debut a
zero-waste initiative that doubles as an innovative austerity program.The initiative is a Mail Preference Service designed by
Catalog Choice to provide consumers greater control over the marketing materials that enter their mailboxes and, in turn,
help cities shed millions of pounds of waste and thousands in costs.
"From coast to coast, these leading cities are taking strides toward a zero-waste mission—and setting a positive precedent
for consumer choice,"said Chuck Teller, Executive Director, Catalog Choice,the leading non-profit service for mail
efficiency and privacy control. 'They are empowering their constituents to stop unwanted mail and phone books at the
source while cutting costs for their city."
The Numbers
Direct mail advertising creates more than 10 billion pounds of solid waste each year. The annual cost to collect&
dispose of advertising mail&phone books is at least$1 billion annually. 62%of advertising mail and phone books is
not recycled.
To support the city programs, Catalog Choice hosts a localized site for each locale on www.cataloachoice.ora,where
citizens sign up to control the amount and scope of unsolicited mail they receive—eliminating unnecessary waste. The cities
will receive detailed reporting on local participation by zip code, solid waste diversion and environmental benefits.With the
annual collection and landfill cost of these mailings and phone books estimated at up to$10 per household,the cost
savings for cities will be significant.
Chicago Department of Environment Commissioner Suzanne Malec-McKenna said, "We've identified waste reduction as a
crucial strategy to meet the goals of our Chicago Climate Action Plan. The Mail Preference Service with Catalog Choice will
cut paper waste at the source, and offers an ease of use that we know Chicago citizens and businesses will appreciate."
Catalog Choice connects 1.3 million consumers with 4,000 companies to fine-tune mailing lists. "This is a win-win service
that enables both companies and communities to be more efficient and cut waste on all ends."added Teller.
The Mail Preference Service is supported by the city governments or their partners. The sponsoring partner for Kansas City
is Keep America Beautiful. For Ithaca,the sponsor is The Park Foundation. For Berkeley,the sponsor is the Kendeda Fund.
Advertisement Advertisement
http://www.pwmag.com/industry-news-print.asp?sectionID=772&articleID=l 531955 4/8/2011
Format Dynamics :: DelI Viewer Page 1 of 3
IMEMEM
Special Report end of 2012 but not needed until Nov. 1, 2013,
L.A., County garbage it when the Puente Hills Landfill closes.
be rid'Ung the rails, but, The waste-by-rail system will entail garbage
trucks taking their trash to a material recycling
how many haulers, will facility on Workman
buy a ticket? Mill Road. The remaining trash will be trucked
across the street to a 17-acre yard and then put
on a train. From there it will go about 200 miles
By Mike Sprague,Staff Writer to the Mesquite Regional Landfill.
Posted, 041100111 0,8:02,44 PM PD r The amount of trash coming to the Puente Hills
Landfill is already down by 50 percent because of
the recession, Revilla said.
v III
As a result, there is enough capacity in Southern
California to take trash, he said.
"With the way the economy has gone, (the
ity it
system)isn't required as much as even it was five
years ago.,,
o
Gary Clifford, chief operating officer for Athens
Services that serves 30 cities In the Greater San
Gabriel Valley area, said the waste-by-rail
Contractors work on the underpass road that system is needed.
connects the Puente Hills Materials Recovery Facility
(MRF)and the Intermodal Facility for the Waste-by-Rail Although Clifford called the Sanitation Districts
System for the Sanitation Districts of LA County on
Workman Mill Road in Whittier on Thursday April 7, a good partner and is likely to be part of a long-
2011.The waste-by-rail operation is expected to be
completed in 2012.(SGVN/Staff Photo by Keith
Durflinger)
of
Work on a massive waste-by-rail project in
Industry is about halfway done, but the question
remains just how many trash haulers will use the
program to send their waste to the desert.
It's a question officials at Sanitation Districts of
Los Angeles, which is building the $450 million
project, will have to mull over when setting
rates, said Mark Revilla, supervising engineer for
the Solid Waste Management Department of the
Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County.
The project is expected to be completed by the // / �' �,g�, ��� ,�tnay^�� >
Print Powered By vd p ! Dy n a rtI c",S
http://www.sgvtribune.com/fdcp?unique=1302548105930 4/11/2011
Format Dynamics :: Dell Viewer Page 2 of 3
term solution, he wouldn't say that his company "We're confident the Sanitation Districts will
will feed its trash into the system. figure out ways to control the cost," he said. "You
have to go back to the issue of why we are doing
"It's a little early to see how the model will look," this. It's the people generating the trash."
he said. "(But) our main job is to avoid using
landfills by reusing, recycling and removing as Revilla said it's possible that in the early going
many good things out of the trash as we can," he not all of the capacity of the system will be used.
said.
While two trains each carrying 4,000 tons of
Already one city, Claremont, is taking trash to trash can go out every day, maybe only one train
Brea instead of the Puente Hills Landfill because a day or a couple of trains a week will go out to
of its rising fees. Mesquite, he said.
And the cost to run waste-by-rail is$80 per ton "(But) if somebody comes in with trash, they'll be
in contrast to the $30 per ton charged for trash able to use our facility," Revilla said. "If the
coming into the Puente Hills Landfill. economy starts picking up, we will need this
more than we need it now."
Revilla said the Sanitation Districts won't charge
that much in order to remain competitive with In addition to the 8,000 daily tons of trash that
other landfills. can be taken from the Industry train yard,
another 12,000 tons can be taken from other
"We can't charge$80 per ton and expect locations to the Mesquite landfill.
someone to come in," he said.
That landfill has a capacity of 800 million tons
That's why the districts began saving money- it and has a projected life of about 100 years.
has about$200 million -allowing the system to
be subsidized and rates to be raised gradually, As a result of the construction project, Workman
he said. Mill Road has been cut to one lane each and
raised about six feet for the tunnel underneath
The actual rates remain uncertain and won't be the road from the material recycling facility to
set for awhile, he said. the train yard.
Still, the waste-by-rail system is needed and is
required by the last permit allowing the Puente / � ` I RECTV has
Hills landfill to remain open until 2013, Revilla
said. irore. of wha t ai
"If we didn't meet certain dates, the amount of YJ want wiva61I !,
tonnage we can take in the landfill would be
reduced," he said. o
ro � �r
Nicholas Conway, executive director of the San �r �
Gabriel Valley Council of Governments, said he ��� � a � o � today ' �
believes the waste-by-rail s stem is necessary.
y
"We recognize things like rail are important and
necessary," Conway said.
Print Powered By E°ry Y� i I
http://www.sgvtribune.com/fdcp?unique=1302548105930 4/11/2011
Format Dynamics :: Dell Viewer Page 3 of 3
While the tunnel under the road is nearly
complete, work to go underneath the Union
Pacific Railroad has yet to start.
The train yard, a former Montgomery Ward
shipping center, 2500 and 2520 Pellissier Place,
was purchased for$40 million. Cost of the
construction is about$100 million.
562-695-0955, ext. 3022
Send flowers, � � 1
'Isar ;my occasion �M
Boliqpets
froin 99
n
� .
r4 -!slh
u
Offer ONLY availabie ae
� or call 1.$77_$04.1133
Print Powered By ''tj,�
http://www.sgvtribune.coi-n/fdcp?unique=1302548105930 4/11/2011