Loading...
Agenda Packets - Recycling - 2011-04-25 COSTA MESA SANI'FARYDISIJUCT RECYCLING COMN41'171,"E`E,,� AGENDA onday,A mtil 2 , ` X141 - 10:30 ,A.:m. Costa esa Saanitaty District 6128 W o, 19,1, Staeet (Dir °t.ttmtt Fitzpatrick and President oten) . .11 Ditectors are webt:orne. I. CY2011 Recychng Cont uutix' ee G'm»uls Review CY 201 1. Goals 11. Waste Diversion Repo — March 2011 0 t"date on liow CIISD is meeting AB 939 goals Ill. Recycffiig Retort--1h. arch 2011 W Special Pti.cing/Green Waste C Bs_-Ovil Report IV. 1" n inwincr En:f6rcement Officer's Rep,ort 0 Review C'.t: O enforcement activities for tr2sh cans,gt tf t:i and scavenging V. Scavenging Report R,6vquv scavenging actinides ueporred to CzPoIItD Update on the lockable containers—Oral Report vi. Qdy Public Outreoch Cat1u°ndor Review upcoming community events IL Per Cap,ita Disposal Rate 16 Review and discuss report on the States new disposal reporting method Vill]. Graffiti Abatavauteao 11rci,gnt,aru For Trash Cans 0, Retiiew and discuss CR&R's graffiti abatement program I.X. Articles of interest Public Works Online--Cities debut zero-waste izitiatives San Gabriel Valley't'ribuu.e L.A. '(kni uty g-arbage will be riding the rad ICI A-CI 1'I'I I S Norte X,1. Thais is the time to receive any comments from members of the public. Next'6ufeetirug Date— May 23,2011 Datet,l;. April 21,2411 C'let oN�theDistn't Item No. I. CY 201 0 Recycling Committee Goals 1, Encourage Non-Profit Origanization,s and Schools 'to impllemznt I cyclinig Projects and/or Programs IL Monitor advancements and technology in the ohid waste industry M. Promote recycling, at community events. 1V EncOUTGg,e Zero Waste pructices amang Residents and Schools 'V. A dvocatie stpstainable Practices toensure pirecilouls resouirces are saved Vr.r. Implement a Community Awareness Program emphasizing District pro grarns and ,special events Item No. II. CR Transfer To: Joan Revak From: CR Transfer Inc. Jurisdiction: Costa Mesa Sanitary District(9) MonthNear: Mar-11 Recycling Report Recycle Tons Commodity Percentage Recycled Newspaper 9.61% 315.14 Cardboard 7.38% 241.99 Mixed Paper 12.53% 410.82 Glass 4.17% 136.82 PET 0.95% 30.98 HDPE 0.84% 27.41 Aluminum Cans 0.27% 8.94 Metal 0.68% 22.32 Tin 1.82% 59.57 Greenwaste 10.10% 331.17 Wood 3.01% 98.72 Mixed Plastics 2.77% 90.83 Totals 54.14% 1774.72 County& Newport Bch Total Total Tonnage 3277.77 235.331 3513.10 Rec c[ed Tonnage 1774.72 122.29 1897.01 Landfill Tonnage 1503.05 113.04 1616.09 CR Transfer To: Joan Revak From: CR Transfer Inc. Jurisdiction: Costa Mesa Sanitary District Santa Ana Heights (11) MonthNear: Mar-11 Recycling Report Recycle Tons Commodity Percentage Rec cled Newspaper 3.91% 9.21 Cardboard 5.58% 13.12 Mixed Paper 9.08% 21.37 Glass 5.41% 12.72 PET 0.82% 1.92 HDPE 1.21% 2.84 Aluminum Cans 0.33% 0.78 Tin 2.12% 4.99 Greenwaste 14.02% 33.00 Wood 5.03% 11.84 Mixed Plastics 4.46% 10.50 Totals 51.97°/a 122.29 Total Tonnage 235.33 Recycled Tonnage 122.29 Landfill Tonnage 113.04 / o Uj /o ii% �f i"t pr 11 j a/ / 'Al / % „D I X. �0 m � `,, rim //, 111111 '��j i% dM �j f IIVV ;T f f J G/ i v�o / / u r / E/ /ii D �/� 9 �,�yf/%r III v , pro J p°I � �aw;�Offi UJ B ;Y' 11 f : Y. k v / a h s r, l ' � l IS fry TP tl� MEN % o/i /l RE Z%%/ ` {/ /j, ally: IC: r R ' � lim i r % , �O��rhA-,� At Ifs %/ ap ra ,% Item No. IV. ..... COST - ES.A- S ART(DISTWiCT, -Memorandum To: Scott Carroll, General Manager From: Isidro Gallardo, Ordinance Enforcement Officer Date: April 18, 2019 Subject: Ordinance Enforcement Report This report summarizes major points for three ordinance enforcement topics covering Scavenging, Graffiti, and Trash Container Enforcement. Scavenging: In the month March, there were no calls to the District HQ to report scavenging activity. However, there were scavenging incidents observed directly by the OEO to report. Areas and times were scavenging was observed by the OEO: DATE TIME ADDRESSES. i .. 03/07/2011 9:30am 200-300 Block of Avocado St, 500-700 Block of Joann St 03/08/2011 7:40am 700 Block of W. 18 St, 700 Block of Shalimar St 03/11/2019 8:45am 3000 Block of Fillmore Way 03/14/2011 7:15am 750 Block of Center St, 1900 Block of Federal Ave 03/15/2011 9:15am 1600-1650 Block of Fullerton Ave 03/21/2011 8:35am 400-500 Block of Bernard St In the above incidents, the OEO made contact with the offender, took as much personal information from them as possible (took pictures if able), and gave them a verbal warning to stop scavenging. Attached are pictures of scavengers observed in the community. Graffiti: OEO continues to work with Frank Campos (CR&R) to target areas that need attention regarding graffiti removal from trash containers. The following addresses where submitted to Mr. Campos on March 28, 2011: 2000 Blocks of Palace Avenue, Wallace Avenue, Sterling Avenue, and the 700 Block of W. 20th Street. The area has Protecting our community's health and the environment by providing solid waste and sewer collection services. www.crosdca.go v Ordinance Enforcement Report April 18, 2011 Page 2 of 3 approximately 35-40 trash containers with graffiti on them. Mr. Campos will notify the OEO when the trash containers have been serviced by CR&R. Trash Container Enforcement: In the month of March, there were no calls to the District HQ to report residents who either store there trash containers in public view or leave their trash containers out on the street curb well after the trash has been picked up. However, increased surveillance was placed on Santa Ana Avenue (between Monte Vista Avenue and Mesa Drive) and neighboring streets to address several residents who leave their trash containers out on the street curb well after trash pick-up day. A summary of the courtesy notice process for the District OEO is provided in the following chart and demonstrates the effectiveness of a 1sf Notice": M rCh 'i-37 0'I 1 15t 507 Cou esy `N+o ce l, tter° South of Wilson St. 13 1 0 Wilson St. to Adams Ave. 15 5 0 Adams Ave. to Sunflower Ave. 1 7 1 0 1 0 In addition, the General Manager gave me a list of street addresses that are storing trash cans in public view, which is attached hereto. The list was provided by a resident in the community. On April 8, 2011 and April 15, 2011, the OEO visited several of the street addresses on the list and observed twenty locations where trash cans were in public view. These locations are below: Royal Palm Dr.: 2944 Ponderosa St.: 1598 & 1609 Myrtlewood St.: 1626 Andros St.: 2908 & 2929 Redwood: Ave.: 2917, 2924, 2964, & 2984 Oahu PL: 1658 & 1654 Sandalwood St.: 1608, 1629, & 1625 Palau PI.: 1617 Primrose St.: 1616 Minorca Dr.: 1633, 1639, & 1640 The residents at the addresses above received a warning notice that was placed on the lid of their trash cans. OEO will revisit the area on April 22, 2011 ensure compliance and to also increase surveillance in neighboring streets and the OEO will report his findings at today's Recycling Committee meetings. Other: On March 16, 2011, the OEO contacted the Chief Code Enforcement Officer for the City of Costa Mesa (CM), Willa Bouwens-Killen, to inquire about a ride-along with a CM Code Enforcement Officer (CEO). Ms. Bouwens-Killen, very accommodating, paired the District OEO with CM CEO Tim Sun for a ride-along on March 17, 2011, CEO Tim Sun was very cooperative and shared a wealth knowledge and expertise about CM and his job duties; knowledge and expertise that proved Board of Directors April 18, 2011 Page 3 of 3 beneficial to the District OEO. Mr. Sun shared some tips on how to approach different complaints or situations out on the field with a safety first mentality; for example, when making contact with a resident or a scavenger out on the street. He also took the District OEO on a drive through some of the areas of the city were scavenging is more common than other areas. Item No. V. March 2011 Scavenging CFS Calls For Service or On Viewed with arrest or citation issued: Location CAD# -DR;0- RD I Dispo I Date I M9:31:1 439 FAIR DR LPD110327019947 "*11-3516 13 RTFAR 03/27/11 RD 13= 1 3150 HARBOR BLVD *NIA 11-203258 1 20 1 Cl 03/05/11 10:00 RD 20 = 1 W PAULARINO AV&GARFIELD AV LPD110325019491 11-204597 1 21 1 Cl 03/25/11 9:36:10 RD21 = 1 3089 BRISTOL ST N1A 11-203114 1 22 1 Cl 03/01/11 5:27 RD 22 = 1 Total = 4 "Officer initiated call -Original CFS was reference savenging however the subject had a warrant and was arrested Calls For Service with no arresticitation: Location CAD# DR# RD I Dispo JJ Date Time 1850 WHITTIER AVE LPD110317017613 11 1 1 UTL It 03/17/111" 8:09:01 RD 01 = 1 685 W 18TH ST LPD110306015205 1 2 1 GOA 03/06/11 9:28:46 RD02 = 1 1900 WHITTIER AV LPD110314016981 1 8 1 GOA 03/14/11 7:44:50 1989 CONTINENTAL AV LPD110314017018 1 8 1 PAWC 103/14/11110:01:47 RD08= 2 HAMILTON ST&HARBOR BLVD I LPD110321018623 9 1 UTL 03/21/11 10:04:58 RD 09= 1 371 HAMILTON ST LPD110328020168 11 1 GOA 03/28/11 10:17:13 371 HAMILTON ST LPD1 103280202101 1 11 1 GOA 103/28/11113:32:54 RD11 = 2 241 TULANE RD LPD110323019052 1 13 1 UTL 03/23/11 7:24:07 RD13 = 1 1555 E MESA VERDE DR LPD110316017409 1 15 1 PAWC 03/16/11 9:33:55 RD15 = 1 3008 FILLMORE WY LPD110309015851 21 1 GOA 03/09/11 13:23:54 3008 FILLMORE WY LPD110323019134 21 GOA 03/23/11 14:49:08 3008 FILLMORE WY LPD110309015802 21 PAWC 03/09/11 6:53:31 3008 FILLMORE WY LPD110323019037 21 PAWC 03/23/11 4:46:56 3008 FILLMORE WY LPD110323019050 21 PAWC 03/23/11 7:22:08 3008 FILLMORE WY LPD110329020336 21 UTL 03/29/11 7:23:06 RD21 = 6 743 SCHENLEY BAY LPD110307015550 1 22 1 GOA 03/07/11 22:22:22 840 W BAKER ST LPD110302014201 1 22 1 GOA 103/02111112:13:43 RD22 = 2 BROOKLINE LN&VANGUARD WY I LPD110302014158 35 1 UTL 03/02/11 8:57:13 RD35 = 1 Total = 18 Dispo Translation: CI- Citaiton Issued UTL- Unable To Locate GOA- Gone On Arrival PAWC- Party Advised,Will Comply Locations are apartment or condo complexes: RTFAR- Report To Follow Arrest 1555 E MESA VERDE DR PINEBROOK VILLAGE 1850 WHITTIER AVE CAMDEN APARTMENTS 439 FAIR DR MED VILLAGE APTS 840 W BAKER ST WOODLAND VILLAGE APTS 743 SCHENLEY BAY Condo Complex Scavenging CFS March 2011 -P ,�.u�� 1yy Off �u � Ni rrr p xu� n� .� aen„aru,��mr�"a tiuu >t 1 .�119111/�,,rrp,r�y mm�i�+l�l�irrr��x 99� rm i� r� W ��11 w �1 ifir ; Rr. 19j tl,„„ �� �,.�—!�! ^'� �Y Y �,��aJ + ,.✓""rt9lY h�� +��((IIV� '.P. 3I x �( � ho\\ (Y II' I 9roti 4 �.un. ... O � ° . j r"RiXU� a�dV NUg ,, kJflu,m `" Jvx� p ...t.,, ._ ....r.� �4�„�U,..�ti g� � �'� ��r vur>,lr�ri irrr«arexs�ertr:,,, Auiee nw➢t'��NV�! �.. � v�' 7 Legend: Y���� Scavenging CFS 03-11 'I N. �. ��""� LOCATION: 1555 E MESA VERDE DR �rgrmsrm�swr cBra r� i � r �J iriri�nl)�„ ! ��� �""� � 1850 WHITTIERAV 1900 WHITTIERAV "Ev,i,� � x rlp�mxrm,N�; rrrrim�oi nri mur im iw^irry uau�rrr �a m� 11), IIWAIM1v01 �tq� r�xx x mrwr i rr,,, 1989 CONTINENTAL AV % 241 TULANE RD 3008 FILLMORE WY 3089 BRISTOL ST � runwaumr�ai�� ... � , �w 1 ' 3'150 HARBOR BLVD 371 HAMILTON St . . . � o �I 4� ti„ ;t t 439 FAIR DR L685 rrix„� ms 685 W 18TH ST r�, 743 SCHENLEY BAY 840 IN BAKER ST BROOKLINE LN&VANGUARD WY HAMILTON ST&HARBOR BLVD W PAULARINOAV&GAREIELD AV rY,,I yr„ RIQ outline NO,AX'H a d o°s a o` ooh �a rL oo.o a 0(2• a N o0c 1 0 N °z H 00. N L.. .Q p. � T 00. art 0 N 00, uy b' LO o1%) 00.N � �b oos T � T � 00, V b OO• oDC �b 00 'b 002 a0 ti CD l!) ct c7 N r Q 00. r W O r O - r O O O N- N N r, LO aQ o� �a p co 94� co c� L T� L � n T� V r (1) "' ��a6 l N - r L y ccs LO O LO o N 04 �- r � - � - -- - - - � - - . . 7 ƒ 2 � ® \ EV 2 § f @ E C14 c $ \ / 7 / E CL = g 0 I � E � c / \ / d % � ( M t ±\ t � 1a / /% ƒ 5 REgCO w / & \ / / 2U- r / - d- -- -�- . - --- � - - - -- � � - . N ' ® cz . $ L ƒ X044 \% \c < � 0t= o c / } \ c) C(D �_ �. . . � . . . .. : _�. . .. . . . ... . . . .. . >1 7 � 2 ¥ � . a = c LO C14 } [ \ CO � &± } ( * 2 / \Lo ƒ k . : 2 � ƒ � § � � \ 7 3 AA co C) ti f9 r 04 (D a) 2: o6 E2 0 L) 0 C) a) 0 to 0 Of C) C14 cc CD CD 10 >1 co U') C) C) E cu E C> -C 0 In >,-o), C) c S) 100 O 0) U) 0 T 0 E od 0 <0 Ir- O a) N ir- co Ep :;7, 0 cc _!n _0 :3 E o IL a) 0- C) 0 w CD co 2 LO C14 U- C14 VA 1,,n cn L LL N .-J f OD LO U r r N (C LL co p I T N C Cl v^". CD 0 g Ck -lz LL „Po 3 (D LL 4"uyy, F- a) ro of a a p N 67UHU � Co M � OCN CD C u � 3: IMF LD N M N J NtiP M rn Qt I U � i m M.Mi wok CO Q tY N a7ik 1 LL A � y I LL S4 2 —i t CD LL N EZ Si IM q E CL M, CIO CL CL r= ML 0 JZ- 1 9 w =I'm b" V) 0 V) 0 12% E Co 7u E", 0 0 N 25 2 In C) u- C) C: I CL CD"S c" ICU 0 L C6 m LO C\1 y CD 0 c6' z'= Q 0 IX IW I p �b FF 01 0 0 00 1 .0 N I'0 0 E s CD CL=k Q- c'), Ei C' o- 0 0 >1 0 = 0 'r C)- U) -�e IT r= E -25 Ira (y) 0 0 0 0 J -j C2 E IE La, LL. C14 CD Lr) rj-j IN J CD C> j5 0 CZ CD cn ............ 0- IV LL, U 0 8 - _0 co [if EE (1) �0 L0 s C) 0 2 0 0 J co C) ca- o 0 J- CL U) M M E -?5 U" kill CD O Q C14 CO 0 E �9 P n A CL 0 [ O an Q C j r? CL E je Y I Lea EP ce) C,�3 C7 irk (• Co U J _J� ! r C) N N I (D w U5 CD a U) ��. � C CL T dam n'u u .0 L + 0 S w^ O y, N O tl Lr (0 rnre LS") U � .�� i t C) s u = r m N ➢ E 'I:S R "d W b7 N ..�'' L i G Q r ,IC w: :". "" E x,la, D GO LO f N - ry C "CIT a--r F ro 5 C), 85 O mt yeaj a r u o o l� N r1 On � r cq 0 "-ti r U c5l ., r N Cr) JC d F— OD 81 4 i s CU IM C+') Cl' Q N 0) _j (h IC�u w N 0 C4i, s co ., � U Ln aj N N r co r N CL' N i m CL Y'3 en m C CL CL E 4� E f� (5, U! i N N Item No. VII. COSTA 9YESA S.A.AqTART(D1STRICT . . . iii pe Memorandum To: Recycling Committee From: Scott Carroll, General Manager1-r " Date: April 25, 2011 Subject: Per Capita Disposal Rate Summary As per direction of Chairman Fitzpatrick, below is an overview of the State's new disposal reporting method. Staff Recommendation That the Recycling Committee receives and files this report Analysis In 1989, the State Legislature passed a historic legislation, commonly known as the California Integrated Waste Management Act (AB 939); requiring local jurisdictions to divert 50% of their 1990 base-year refuse generation by the year 2000. Jurisdictions must continue to divert 50% of their refuse in proceeding years of 2000 or face possible fines of $10,000 a day. To calculate a jurisdiction's diversion rate, the State used a complicated method that used population, employment and inflation-adjusted taxable sales to estimate waste generation tons for each measurement year. It was time consuming and a lengthy process to complete and diversion rates could not be finalized for several years. In 2007, the State Legislature passed SIB 1016 that simplified calculating compliance measurements for AB 939. SIB 1016 accomplishes this by changing to a disposal- based indicator: the per capita disposal rate, which uses only two factors: a jurisdiction's population and its disposal as reported by disposal facilities. It creates a clearer picture of where a jurisdiction stands in their waste reduction efforts, but most importantly, SIB 1016 makes it easier to see where improvements are needed, and frees up resources to address those areas. Trotecting our community's heaftFi and the environment by providing soi'idwaste andsewer collection services, zarrrrrv.crosdca.gov Recycling Committee April 25, 2011 Page 2 of 3 The overall mandate has not changed. What has changed is how each jurisdiction's progress is measured to reach the 50 percent goal for diverting waste from landfills. This measurement. is no longer determinative of compliance. An important point to remember is that if a jurisdiction was at 50 percent under the old system, it is at 50 percent under the new system. In order for the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) and jurisdictions to more properly focus on successful program implementation, SB 1016 shifts from the historical emphasis on using calculated generation and estimated diversion to using annual disposal as a factor when evaluating jurisdictions' program implementation. Overall benefits of the new approach include: • Focuses on diversion program implementation • Increases simplicity and timeliness of goal measurement • Allows for city, county or regional agency growth • Saves money and time by eliminating complex calculations • Increases CIWMB staff field presence • Adjusts CalRecycle review schedule for cities, counties, and regional agencies. Costa Mesa has met its diversion goal and is implementing programs in the CalRecycle 2005-06 Biennial Review, which are now on a four-year CalRecycle review cycle (over 350 jurisdictions). In order to shift to this new system, jurisdictions must have a measurement that translates AB 939's diversion goal into disposal-based language. This is the "50 percent equivalent per capita disposal target" -- the amount of disposal that is approximately equivalent to a jurisdiction's current 50 percent diversion requirement. CalRecycle has calculated this target for each jurisdiction. Under the new measurement system, to meet the 50 percent target, a jurisdiction needs to annually dispose of an amount equal to or less than its 50 percent equivalent per capita disposal target. The new per capita disposal rate approach is not determinative of a jurisdiction's compliance. CalRecycle will use each jurisdiction's annual per capita disposal as an indicator in evaluating program implementation. CalRecycle's evaluation will be focused on how jurisdictions are implementing programs that they chose. The review of each jurisdiction's compliance will still be on a case-by-case basis. Cities, counties, and regional agencies will not and cannot be compared to others or to a statewide average. Each jurisdiction's 50 percent equivalent per capita disposal target is unique because the target is based upon a jurisdiction's unique base-year generation. CalRecycle's goal is not only to assist local jurisdictions in the development and implementation of waste reduction programs, but also to provide assistance when those programs are not working as they should. If a jurisdiction is not meeting its 50 percent equivalent per capita disposal target, CalRecycle staff will work to help Recycling Committee April 25, 2011 Page 3of3 determine why that may be and work with the jurisdiction to make any necessary program modifications. The change in measurement does change how a jurisdiction will look at the numbers; however, the intent remains the same — waste reduction. Under the old system, if a jurisdiction diverted 50 percent or MORE of its waste, it had met its mandate and was moving in the right direction. Now, under SB 1016, if a jurisdiction's annual disposal rate is at or BELOW its 50 percent equivalent per capita disposal target that is a good thing and is an indicator of program performance. In short, the lower the annual disposal rate, the less waste we are generating, and thus the better we are doing. In Costa Mesa, the per capita disposal target is 8.5 Pounds per Day (PPD). According to the State's website, Costa Mesa is well exceeding the target. 2007 — 6.8 pounds per person per day 2008 — 6.2 pounds per person per day 2009 — 5.1 pounds per person per day Strategic Element & Goal This item supports achieving Strategic Element No. 2.0, Solid Waste and Goal No. 2.5, Encouraging zero waste. Legal Review Not applicable Financial Review Not applicable Public Notice Process Copies of this report are on file and will be included with the entire agenda packet for the April 25, 2011 Recycling Committee regular meeting at District Headquarters and on the District's website. Alternative Actions 1. Refer the matter back to staff for more information. Item VIII. C E-11SA ,, OSV ,M SA�WVRTOISTRICT' . . an indipetidetit�,,�pecia(Distyict Memorandum To: Recycling Committee From: Scott Carroll, General Managr �A Date: April 25, 2011 Subject: Graffiti Abatement Program for Trash Cans Summary Staff has been working with CR&R to abate graffiti on trash cans and improve the appearance of neighborhoods. Some residents have taken upon themselves to spray paint their home address on the automated cans so that no one else can mistakenly or intentionally take away the cans. As you can see in the attached pictures, these cans are unsightly and contribute blight in neighborhoods. Staff Recommendation That the Recycling Committee receives and files this report Analysis CR&R and the District OEO have teamed up together to eliminate this type of blight. The program is simple. The OEO will report spray painted trash cans to CR&R that include the quantity of trash cans along with their street addresses. CR&R will then stencil the address number on the lid of the trash cans and replace them with the blighted cans. As seen in the attached pictures the stencil trash containers can be easily identified by residents while at the same time improves the appearances of neighborhoods. Strategic Element & Goal Not applicable Legal Review Not applicable Troteciing our comrnunity s geafth and the environment by providing solidwaste andsewer co(Cectio77 services. i, -a,w.crosdca.gov Recycling Committee April 25, 2011 Page 2 of 5 Financial Review There is no cost to the District for this program. All costs are borne by CR&R. Public Notice Process Copies of this report are on file and will be included with the entire agenda packet for the April 25, 2011 Recycling Committee regular meeting at District Headquarters and on the District's website. Alternative Actions 1 . Refer the matter back to staff for more information. Recycling Committee April 25, 2011 Page 3 of 5 l » V IIII. y Y I I I �s� Recycling Committee April 25, 2011 Page 4 of 5 f f/ff fff., 0000000000i i iV1�� � i i � Yoh N lar��rutiu��vo�N«�W� 911( rmll fff/ min %f i ' ff Y ' �n I 6 �g lw �( r r Recycling Committee April 25, 2011 Page 5 of 5 J� l I / d, r, J; ��� lll,lill w lei t i IMAM ° 'iur�Illl�ligff 9b�wr IrfJ/J�Ir''l�r 1 r ,. i///�,,�//��,✓arrr r `�/� rr�Y �l%�i r1�miNn� ^>�a�w���f������������1 �� s � „rr,. r a lr� lrr n f '�"�� )jl �' �mNy�/y f Ir�ifuuff�I,r rllri°ri �uv/irllioD�' rrr G��IY� ,.ioU� RN pl w f h Page 1 of 2 Pictures of Scavenging Activities in the Month of April f11111YY1�1yll�)illl/1111 J1%//%/%i/ z IN 1 l i 1 . / r / 1 / i �ra«� t lire f l / r Page 2 of 2 F� h m Ilflyf i y /,/, e i,,: ,,, / �i/,:.•, ..o,,,, /i. ';,.,� ,,,,, � i i�/ iii.: // /�//ii%//%/i//i j/�/io.!// / iii/ /✓, ��/ . ., �, �,r r� /������� ��� ///,. /„/ �i2.://ri ,,, ,,, // %,,,,i ,� %,✓/lilt�/cr „% �ii i ��� ,,,,�� /„ / iii � � �.iiii/,,,ii �� ���.;✓/„/„ %i / ��/�i, r I ��' pp IIIIII, i 1 gg'%iii %iii; Page 1 of 2 Trash cans stored in public view Sunday March 27th 2011 4:00 PM Street Address Redwood Ave. 1582 2915 2921 2924 2964 2984 Samar P]. 1650 Andros St. 2929 2964 Bimini PI. 2956 2964 2968 2969 2969 Baker St. 1590 1618 1625 1629 1637 Myrtlewood St. 1582 1626 Jacaranda St. 2977 2921 Primrose St. 1604 1616 Chestnut Ave. 2909 2920 Page 2 of 2 Royal Pala Dr. 3016 Corsica PI. 1527 1574 1585 1589 1652 Sandalwood St. Yes Gibraltar Ave. 3077 3078 3094 3102 3142 3157 3165 3170 3189 Minorca Dr. 1633 1641 1645 1649 Samar PI. 1650 Public Works Online: Home Page Page 1 of 2 Item No. IX. Print Page Infine ................ . .......__ __................. ..... ... ... Chicago i i icipal pioneers tackling waste by controffing unwanted it and phione books Source: Catalog Choice Publication date: 2011-03-28 BERKELEY, CALIF.(March 8,2011)—More than 100 billion pieces of unsolicited mail are received by Americans each year—and municipalities foot the bill for waste collection and disposal. Today, the communities of Chicago, along with those of Tompkins County(Ithaca), N.Y.; Marion County(Salem), Ore.; Kansas City, Mo.—Kan.; and Berkeley, Calif.,will debut a zero-waste initiative that doubles as an innovative austerity program.The initiative is a Mail Preference Service designed by Catalog Choice to provide consumers greater control over the marketing materials that enter their mailboxes and, in turn, help cities shed millions of pounds of waste and thousands in costs. "From coast to coast, these leading cities are taking strides toward a zero-waste mission—and setting a positive precedent for consumer choice,"said Chuck Teller, Executive Director, Catalog Choice,the leading non-profit service for mail efficiency and privacy control. 'They are empowering their constituents to stop unwanted mail and phone books at the source while cutting costs for their city." The Numbers Direct mail advertising creates more than 10 billion pounds of solid waste each year. The annual cost to collect& dispose of advertising mail&phone books is at least$1 billion annually. 62%of advertising mail and phone books is not recycled. To support the city programs, Catalog Choice hosts a localized site for each locale on www.cataloachoice.ora,where citizens sign up to control the amount and scope of unsolicited mail they receive—eliminating unnecessary waste. The cities will receive detailed reporting on local participation by zip code, solid waste diversion and environmental benefits.With the annual collection and landfill cost of these mailings and phone books estimated at up to$10 per household,the cost savings for cities will be significant. Chicago Department of Environment Commissioner Suzanne Malec-McKenna said, "We've identified waste reduction as a crucial strategy to meet the goals of our Chicago Climate Action Plan. The Mail Preference Service with Catalog Choice will cut paper waste at the source, and offers an ease of use that we know Chicago citizens and businesses will appreciate." Catalog Choice connects 1.3 million consumers with 4,000 companies to fine-tune mailing lists. "This is a win-win service that enables both companies and communities to be more efficient and cut waste on all ends."added Teller. The Mail Preference Service is supported by the city governments or their partners. The sponsoring partner for Kansas City is Keep America Beautiful. For Ithaca,the sponsor is The Park Foundation. For Berkeley,the sponsor is the Kendeda Fund. Advertisement Advertisement http://www.pwmag.com/industry-news-print.asp?sectionID=772&articleID=l 531955 4/8/2011 Format Dynamics :: DelI Viewer Page 1 of 3 IMEMEM Special Report end of 2012 but not needed until Nov. 1, 2013, L.A., County garbage it when the Puente Hills Landfill closes. be rid'Ung the rails, but, The waste-by-rail system will entail garbage trucks taking their trash to a material recycling how many haulers, will facility on Workman buy a ticket? Mill Road. The remaining trash will be trucked across the street to a 17-acre yard and then put on a train. From there it will go about 200 miles By Mike Sprague,Staff Writer to the Mesquite Regional Landfill. Posted, 041100111 0,8:02,44 PM PD r The amount of trash coming to the Puente Hills Landfill is already down by 50 percent because of the recession, Revilla said. v III As a result, there is enough capacity in Southern California to take trash, he said. "With the way the economy has gone, (the ity it system)isn't required as much as even it was five years ago.,, o Gary Clifford, chief operating officer for Athens Services that serves 30 cities In the Greater San Gabriel Valley area, said the waste-by-rail Contractors work on the underpass road that system is needed. connects the Puente Hills Materials Recovery Facility (MRF)and the Intermodal Facility for the Waste-by-Rail Although Clifford called the Sanitation Districts System for the Sanitation Districts of LA County on Workman Mill Road in Whittier on Thursday April 7, a good partner and is likely to be part of a long- 2011.The waste-by-rail operation is expected to be completed in 2012.(SGVN/Staff Photo by Keith Durflinger) of Work on a massive waste-by-rail project in Industry is about halfway done, but the question remains just how many trash haulers will use the program to send their waste to the desert. It's a question officials at Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles, which is building the $450 million project, will have to mull over when setting rates, said Mark Revilla, supervising engineer for the Solid Waste Management Department of the Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County. The project is expected to be completed by the // / �' �,g�, ��� ,�tnay^�� > Print Powered By vd p ! Dy n a rtI c",S http://www.sgvtribune.com/fdcp?unique=1302548105930 4/11/2011 Format Dynamics :: Dell Viewer Page 2 of 3 term solution, he wouldn't say that his company "We're confident the Sanitation Districts will will feed its trash into the system. figure out ways to control the cost," he said. "You have to go back to the issue of why we are doing "It's a little early to see how the model will look," this. It's the people generating the trash." he said. "(But) our main job is to avoid using landfills by reusing, recycling and removing as Revilla said it's possible that in the early going many good things out of the trash as we can," he not all of the capacity of the system will be used. said. While two trains each carrying 4,000 tons of Already one city, Claremont, is taking trash to trash can go out every day, maybe only one train Brea instead of the Puente Hills Landfill because a day or a couple of trains a week will go out to of its rising fees. Mesquite, he said. And the cost to run waste-by-rail is$80 per ton "(But) if somebody comes in with trash, they'll be in contrast to the $30 per ton charged for trash able to use our facility," Revilla said. "If the coming into the Puente Hills Landfill. economy starts picking up, we will need this more than we need it now." Revilla said the Sanitation Districts won't charge that much in order to remain competitive with In addition to the 8,000 daily tons of trash that other landfills. can be taken from the Industry train yard, another 12,000 tons can be taken from other "We can't charge$80 per ton and expect locations to the Mesquite landfill. someone to come in," he said. That landfill has a capacity of 800 million tons That's why the districts began saving money- it and has a projected life of about 100 years. has about$200 million -allowing the system to be subsidized and rates to be raised gradually, As a result of the construction project, Workman he said. Mill Road has been cut to one lane each and raised about six feet for the tunnel underneath The actual rates remain uncertain and won't be the road from the material recycling facility to set for awhile, he said. the train yard. Still, the waste-by-rail system is needed and is required by the last permit allowing the Puente / � ` I RECTV has Hills landfill to remain open until 2013, Revilla said. irore. of wha t ai "If we didn't meet certain dates, the amount of YJ want wiva61I !, tonnage we can take in the landfill would be reduced," he said. o ro � �r Nicholas Conway, executive director of the San �r � Gabriel Valley Council of Governments, said he ��� � a � o � today ' � believes the waste-by-rail s stem is necessary. y "We recognize things like rail are important and necessary," Conway said. Print Powered By E°ry Y� i I http://www.sgvtribune.com/fdcp?unique=1302548105930 4/11/2011 Format Dynamics :: Dell Viewer Page 3 of 3 While the tunnel under the road is nearly complete, work to go underneath the Union Pacific Railroad has yet to start. The train yard, a former Montgomery Ward shipping center, 2500 and 2520 Pellissier Place, was purchased for$40 million. Cost of the construction is about$100 million. 562-695-0955, ext. 3022 Send flowers, � � 1 'Isar ;my occasion �M Boliqpets froin 99 n � . r4 -!slh u Offer ONLY availabie ae � or call 1.$77_$04.1133 Print Powered By ''tj,� http://www.sgvtribune.coi-n/fdcp?unique=1302548105930 4/11/2011