Loading...
Agenda Packets - Board - 1998-10-XXProperty, Plant & Equip: 0.00 0.00 8,210.91 682,642.04 0.00 14,240.16 Property Rights 4,025.00 0.00 0.00 4,025.00 4,025.00 0.00 Buildings and Structures 241,647.07 0.00 0.00 241,647.07 COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT 0.00 Subsurface Lines 18,783,763.97 0.00 BALANCE SHEET 18,783,763.97 18,783,763.97 11,501.49 Other Equipment 198,681.51 AS OF OCTOBER 31, 1998 198,681.51 198,681.51 1,148,266.56 Construction in Progress SEWER FACILITIES 10,828.00 510,977.43 558,644.96 GENERAL CONSTRUCTION REVOLVING ACTUAL TOTALS ACCOUNT NAME FUND FUND FUND 1998 -99 1997 -98 Current Assets: (8,513,718.91) (8,513,718.91) Cash and Investments $4,458,660.09 160,787.37 1,673,614.20 6,293,061.66 8,030,350.93 Accounts Receivable 1,397.00 0.00 0.00 1,397.00 15,165.72 Taxes Receivable 19,595.96 0.00 0.00 19,595.96 33,388.48 Interest Receivable 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 67,589.37 Trash Assessments Receivable 134,690.64 0.00 0.00 134,690.64 206,317.68 Sewer Assessments Receivable 44,886.20 0.00 0.00 44,886.20 72,787.09 Due From Other Governments 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Prepaid items 27,086.70 0.00 0.00 27,086.70 Total Current Assets 4,686,316.59 160,787.37 1,673,614.20 6,520,716.16 8,425,599.27 Property, Plant & Equip: 0.00 0.00 8,210.91 682,642.04 0.00 14,240.16 Property Rights 4,025.00 0.00 0.00 4,025.00 4,025.00 0.00 Buildings and Structures 241,647.07 0.00 0.00 241,647.07 241,647.07 0.00 Subsurface Lines 18,783,763.97 0.00 0.00 18,783,763.97 18,783,763.97 11,501.49 Other Equipment 198,681.51 0.00 0.00 198,681.51 198,681.51 1,148,266.56 Construction in Progress 500,149.43 0.00 10,828.00 510,977.43 558,644.96 18,550,376.31 Total Prop., Plant, & Equip. 19,728,266.98 0.00 10,628.00 19,739,094.98 19,786,762.51. Depreciation (8,513,718.91) 0.00 0.00 (8,513,718.91) (8,513,718.91) Net Property, Plant & Equip 11,214,548.07 0.00 10,828.00 11,225,376.07 11,273,043.60 Total Assets $15,900,864.66 160,787.37 1,684,442.20 17,746,094.23 19,698,642.87 Liab. and District Equity Current Liabilities: Accounts Payable CMSD Development Deposits Due to City of Costa Mesa Deferred Revenue Total Current Liabilities District Equity: Contributed Capital $8,210.91 0.00 0.00 8,210.91 682,642.04 0.00 14,240.16 58,058.01 0.00 72,298.17 72,298.17 533,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 187,836.41 1,774,329.89 199,616.16 0.00 0.00 199,616.16 205,489.94 11,305,028.59 Current Earnings (907,107.42) 496.02 11,501.49 (895,109.91) 321,319.18 222,067.23 58,058.01 0.00 280,125.24 1,148,266.56 13,933,677.66 Total District Equity 15,678,797.43 102,729.36 1,684,442.20 17,465,968.99 18,550,376.31 4,616,698.65 0.00 0.00 4,616,698.65 4,616,698.65 19,698,642.87 Res for Trash Assessment Rfnd 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Res for Trash Assessment Rfnd 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 533,000.00 Reserved for Capital Outlay 2,240,329.89 0.00 481,000.00 2,721,329.89 1,774,329.89 Unreserved 9,728,876.31 102,233.34 1,191,940.71 11,023,050.36 11,305,028.59 Current Earnings (907,107.42) 496.02 11,501.49 (895,109.91) 321,319.18 Total Retained Earnings 11,062,098.78 102,729.36 1,684,442.20 12,849,270.34 13,933,677.66 Total District Equity 15,678,797.43 102,729.36 1,684,442.20 17,465,968.99 18,550,376.31 Total Liab. & Dist. Equity $15,900,864.66 160,787.37 1,684,442.20 17,746,094.23 19,698,642.87 Account Name Operating Revenues: Trash Charges Sewer Charges Permits & Inspection Fees Connection Fees Other Charges for Services Other Reimbursements Special Charges Total Operating Revenues Operating Expenses: Solid Waste Disposal: Trash Hauler Contractual Services - General Contract Code Enforcement Liquid Waste Disposal: Sewer Repairs and Maintenance Contractual Services - Liquid Dump Charges: Recycling and Disposal General & Administration Directors Fees General Liability Public Information Special Program Costs Manager /Engineer General Legal Costs Professional Organizations Travel & Meetings Depreciation Total Operating Expenses Operating Income (Loss) Nonoperating Revenue (Expenses; Investment Earnings Taxes Annexation Fees Gain (Loss) /Disposal of Assets Nonoperating Income - Other Gain (Loss) on Investments Nonoperating Expenses - Other Professional Services - Other Capital Replacement Reserve Total Nonoperating Rev (Exp) NET INCOME I COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENSES AS OF OCTOBER 31, 1998 484,143.58 1,223.76 3,295.31 13,298.71 26,284.60 386,870.81 4,500.00 9,028.90 349.00 5,749.49 40,785.00 10,812.50 1,400.00 490.06 0.00 988,231.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 a • FACILITIES 4,500.00 SEWER GENERAL 0.00 CONSTRUCTION FUND 5,749.49 FUND $10,504.38 FUND 0.00 5,068.62 1,400.00 0.00 4,290.00 0.00 0.00 2,730.46 10,504.38 0.00 17.30 0.00 0.00 2,426.53 5,068.62 0.00 9,075.53 10,000.00 0.00 34,112.82 4,290.00 0.00 484,143.58 1,223.76 3,295.31 13,298.71 26,284.60 386,870.81 4,500.00 9,028.90 349.00 5,749.49 40,785.00 10,812.50 1,400.00 490.06 0.00 988,231.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 a • FACILITIES 4,500.00 0.00 9,028.90 0.00 349.00 REVOLVING 5,749.49 ACTUAL TOTALS 40,785.00 FUND 10,812.50 1998 -99 1,400.00 1997 -98 490.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,504.38 2,930,893.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,068.62 0.00 1,512,178.36 10,000.00 0.00 4,290.00 10,000.00 17,573.00 6,217.50 0.00 8,947.96 0.00 49,464.41 1,741.79 0.00 (19.24) 17.30 10,680.92 (19.24) 0.00 2,426.53 0.00 15,224.43 0.00 0.00 (10,886.40) 9,075.53 0.00 6,960.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,217.50 40,330.32 4,542,974.41 0.00 0.00 484,143.58 1,882,778.87 0.00 1,223.76 157,313.12 0.00 3,295.31 8,838.37 0.00 13,298.71 55,137.87 0.00 26,284.60 716,648.51 0.00 386,870.81 1,257,618.86 0.00 4,500.00 0.00 9,028.90 0.00 349.00 0.00 5,749.49 0.00 40,785.00 0.00 10,812.50 0.00 1,400.00 0.00 490.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 988,231.72 (954,118.90) 0.00 6,217.50 (947,901.40) 18,800.00 38,103.96 2,494.33 1,552.83 141,230.00 27,164.00 3,667.00 1,016.55 416,877.42 4,729,241.69 (186,267.28) 15,334.83 496.02 5,283.99 21,114.84 405,137.56 25,265.63 0.00 0.00 25,265.63 118,623.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,235.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,000.00 0.00 0.00 10,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,741.79 (19.24) 0.00 0.00 (19.24) (10,265.44) (3,569.74) 0.00 0.00 (3,569.74) (10,886.40) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 47,011.48 496.02 5,283.99 52,791.49 507,586.46 ($907,107.42) 496.02 11,501.49 (895,109.91) 321,319.18 2. 3. COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENSES BUDGET AND ACTUAL GENERAL FUND FOR THE FOUR MONTHS ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1998 VARIANCE: FAVORABLE Through October ACCOUNT NAME BUDGET ACTUALS (UNFAVORABLE) 1997 -98 ACUTALS 1997 -98 ACUTALS Operating Revenues: Trash Assessments $3,511,522.00 $10,504.38 3,501,017.62 26,493.87 2,930,893.29 Sewer Assessments 1,493,898.00 $5,068.62 1,488,829.38 15,975.86 1,512,178.36 Permits & Inspection Fees 3,000.00 $4,290.00 (1,290.00) 8,693.00 17,573.00 Connection Fees 5,412.00 $2,730.46 2,681.54 2,794.43 22,199.91 Other Charges for Services 1,000.00 $17.30 982.70 14,997.00 10,680.92 Other Reimbursements 15,000.00 $2,426.53 12,573.47 973.41 15,224.43 Special Assessments 6,000.00 $9,075.53 (3,075.53) 2,472.00 6,960.00 Total Operating Revenues 5,035,832.00 34,112.82 5,001,719.18 72,399.57 4,515,709.91 Operating Expenses: Solid Waste Disposal: Trash Hauler 1,918,000.00 $484,143.58 1,433,856.42 476,063.72 1,882,778.87 Contractual Services - General 172,827.00 $1,223.76 171,603.24 0.00 157,313.12 Contract Code Enforcement 20,000.00 $3,295.31 16,704.69 0.00 8,838.37 Liquid Waste Disposal: Sewer Repairs and Maintenance 30,000.00 $13,298.71 16,701.29 0.00 55,137.87 Contractual Services - Liquid 787,323.00 $26,284.60 761,038.40 0.00 716,648.51 Dump Charges: Recycling and Disposal 1,447,000.00 $386,870.81 1,060,129.19 211,935.08 1,257,618.86 General & Administration Directors Fees 20,000.00 $4,500.00 15,500.00 4,000.00 18,800.00 General Liability 36,960.00 $9,028.90 27,931.10 9,525.99 38,103.96 Public Information 35,750.00 $349.00 35,401.00 1,065.08 2,494.33 Operating Costs 45,700.00 $5,749.49 39,950.51 1,466.75 1,552.83 Manager /Engineer 168,200.00 $40,785.00 127,415.00 33,750.00 141,230.00 General Legal Costs 35,000.00 $10,812.50 24,187.50 7,701.50 27,164.00 Professional Organizations 3,700.00 $1,400.00 2,300.00 1,400.00 3,667.00 Travel & Meetings 1,000.00 $490.06 509.94 401.26 1,016.55 Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 416,877.42 Total Operating Expenses - 4,721,460.00 988,231.72 3,733,228.28 747,309.38 4,729,241.69 314,372.00 (954,118.90) 1,.268,490.90 (674,909.81) (213,531.78) Nonoperating Revenue (Expenses) Investment Earnings 300,000.00 $15,334.83 284,665.17 89,210.89 321,873.95 Taxes 99,700.00 $25,265.63 74,434.37 4,967.24 118,623.95 Annexation Fees 0.00 $0.00 0.00 0.00 3,235.00 Gain (Loss) /Disposal of Assets 0.00 $0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Nonoperating Income - Other 0.00 $10,000.00 (10,000.00) 0.00 1,741.79 Gain (Loss) on Investments 0.00 $0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Nonope rating Expenses - Other (5,000.00) ($19.24) (4,980.76) 0.00 (10,265.44) Professional Services - Other (10,000.00) ($3,569.74) (6,430.26) (786.25) (10,886.40) Capital Replacement Reserve (12,072.00) 0.00 (12,072.00) 0.00 0.00 Total Nonoperating Rev (Exp) 372,628.00 47,011.46 325,616.52 93,391.88 424,322.85 NET INCOME $687,000.00 ($907,107.42) 1,594,107.42 (561,517.93) 210,791.07 3. PRIOR YEARS 1 #128- Mesa /Birch Swr Relgn 6,527.00 452.00 0.00 71,973.00 6,075.00 COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT #129 - Bristol St. Pump Stn. 0.00 0.00 0.00 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS 19,172.00 #135- Reconst.FrcMn E1denII 130,201.18 155.00 FOR THE FOUR MONTHS ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1998 130,046.18 $141,346.88 #147- Update Early Wrn Sys 100,000.00 19,000.00 0.00 PRIOR YEARS' 81,000.00 ACCOUNT NAME BUDGET ENCUMBRANCES ACTUALS EXPENDITURES BALANCE CURRENT YEAR 2,714.00 504,286.00 #150 - Update Pump Stn Alrm 94,702.05 #149 - Sinking Fd /Swr Replm $200,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 200,000.00 #156 -Major Emerg Swr Rrcon 150,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 150,000.00 #159- Televising Swr Lines 17,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17,000.00 4161 - Constr Water Svc,li Stns 70,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 70,000.00 #162 -Pilot Prog,Use of Enzymes 60,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60,000.00 #163- Upgrade Emerg Response Sys 140,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 140,000.00 #164 -MiSC Swr Work /Manhole Adj. 50,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50,000.00 Current Year Sub -Total 687,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 687,000.00 PRIOR YEARS #128 - Mesa /Birch Swr Relgn #128- Mesa /Birch Swr Relgn 6,527.00 452.00 0.00 71,973.00 6,075.00 260,000.00 #129 - Bristol St. Pump Stn. 0.00 0.00 0.00 89,474.85 0.00 19,172.00 #135- Reconst.FrcMn E1denII 130,201.18 155.00 0.00 189,798.82 130,046.18 $141,346.88 #147- Update Early Wrn Sys 100,000.00 19,000.00 0.00 0.00 81,000.00 #149- Sinking Fd /Swr Replm 504,286.00 0.00 0.00 2,714.00 504,286.00 #150 - Update Pump Stn Alrm 94,702.05 18,524.61 76,177.44 155,297.95 0.00 #151 - Reconst. Var Swr Lns 150,000.00 20,579.64 0.00 0.00 129,420.36 #152- Televising Swr Lines 17,000.00 8,118.00 882.00 0.00 8,000.00 #153 -Swr Lat Root Study 15,000.00 14,055.00 945.00 0.00 0.00 #154 -Reimb Swr Work -Other 3,649.10 0.00 3,649.10 43,275.90 0.00 #155 -Swr Master Plan 18,000.00 0.00 0.00 6,110.44 18,000.00 #156 -Major Emerg Swr Reconstr. 450,000.00 8,562.98 7,369.94 0.00 434,067.08 #157- Televising Swr Lines 17,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17,000.00 #158 -Reimb Swr Work -Other 46,964.56 (12,369.50) 41,495.40 0.00 17,838.66 Total Operating Expenses 1,553,329.89 77,077.73 130,518.88 558,644.96 1,345,733.28 TOTAL CAP.REPLACEMENT RSRV 2,240,329.89 77,077.73 130,518.88 558,644.96 2,032,733.28 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT RESERVE CURRENT YEAR PRIOR YEARS #128 - Mesa /Birch Swr Relgn 221,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 221,000.00 #160 - Fairview Park Sewer 260,000.00 19,172.00 10,828.00 0.00 230,000.00 TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENT RSRV 481,000.00 19,172.00 10,828.00 0.00 451,000.00 GRAND TOTAL $2,721,329.89 $96,249.73 $141,346.88 $558,644.96 $2,483,733.28 4. i To: Lois Thomp3oo From CR Tmanefer Inc. Costa Mesa Sanitary District Santa Ana Heights (38041) OCTOBER 1998 Recycling Report Pmjeetions Facility Waste Recovery Recycled Commodity Stream % Rate % % Tonnage Newspaper Cardboard Mixed Paper Glace Pet HDPE Aluminum Tin/mew Yerdwaste Other (Ceacretc/Asphatt/Wood) °Total Tonnage Recycled Tonnage Landfilled Tonnage 13.90 20.18% 2.81 4.7S S.30 23.28% 1.23 2.09 18.40 22.68% 4.17 7,06 6.00 0,00% 0.00 0.00 0.20 16.92% 0.03 0.06 2.00 0,80"/0 0.02 0.03 0.40 14.00% 0.06 0.09 1.80 17.88% 0.32 0.54 17.10 87.64% 14.99 25.36 34.90 39.29% 13.71 23.20 100.00 37.34 63.19 169.24 63.19 106.05. To: Lois Thompson From: CR Transfer Inc. Costa Mesa Sanitary District (38001) OCTOBER 1998 Recycling Report Projections Facility Waste Recovery Recycled Commodity Stream. % Rate % % Tonnage Newspaper 13.90 20.18% 2.81 72.67 Cardboard 5.30 23.28% 1.23 31.96 Mixed paper 18.40 22.68% 4.17 108.11; Glass 6.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 Pet 0.20 16.92% 0.03 0.88 HDFE 2100 0.80% 0.02 0.41 Aluminum 0.40 14.00% 0.06 1.45 Tin/Metal 1.80 17.88% 0.32 8.34 Yerdwaste 17.10 87.64% 14.99 388.24 Other Tcncrete/Asphalt"Wood) 34,90 39.29% 13.71 355,27 100.00 37.34 969.32 COUNTY TOTAL Total Tannage 2,590.58 169.24 2,759.82 Recycled Tonnage 967.32 63.19 1,030.51 Land$lled Tonnage 1,623,26 106.05 1,729.31 I Ri,l y�r 0 TOTAL 12,104.18 11,276.24 827.94 Recycled Tonnage 1165.03 937.30 1093.06 1030.51 4,225.90 City 1,083.66 874.72 1,011.39 967.32 3,937.09 County 81.37 62.58 81.67 63.19 288.81 Landfilled Tonnage 2,147.87 1,989.82 2,011.28 WASTE DIVERSION REPORT 7,878.28 City 1,997.85 1,856.98 FY- 1998 -99 1,623.26 JUL AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN Total Tonnage 3,312.90 2,927.12 3,104.34 2,759.82 City 3,081.51 2,731.70 2,872.45 2,590.58 County 231.39 .195.42 231.89.. 169.24 TOTAL 12,104.18 11,276.24 827.94 Recycled Tonnage 1165.03 937.30 1093.06 1030.51 4,225.90 City 1,083.66 874.72 1,011.39 967.32 3,937.09 County 81.37 62.58 81.67 63.19 288.81 Landfilled Tonnage 2,147.87 1,989.82 2,011.28 1,729.31 7,878.28 City 1,997.85 1,856.98 1,861.06 1,623.26 7,339.15 County 150.02 132.84 150.22 106.05 539.13 Recycled % 35.17 32.02 35.21 37.34 34.91 Waste Diversion FY 98 -99fjr 11/9/98 Total Tonnage City County Recycled Tonnage City County 896.32 800.92 965.65 945.73 1052.65 1047.36 1165.03 937.30 1093.06 1030.51 840.19 748.77 906.45 871.90 982.82 978.99 1,083.66 874.72 1,011.39 967.32 56.13 52.15 59.2 73.83 69.83 68.37 81.37 62.58 81.67 63.19 TOTAL 29,779.76 27,775.86 2,003.90 9,934.53 9,266.21 668.32 Landfilled Tonnage 2,008.71 1,798.52 2,045.58 WASTE DIVERSION REPORT 2,062.82 1,950.29 2,147.87 1,989.82 2,011.28 1,729.31 19,845.23 City 1998 1,681.42 1,920.17 1,937.02 1,925.99 JAN FEB MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 2,905.03 2,599.44 3,011.23 3,046.76 3,115.47 2,997.65 3,312.90 2,927.12 3,104.34 2,759.82 2,723.12 2,430.19 2,826.62 2,808.92 2,908.81 2,801.96 3,081.51 2,731.70 2,872.45 2,590.58 181.91 169.25 184.61 237.84 206.66 195.69 231.39 195.42 231.89 169.24 896.32 800.92 965.65 945.73 1052.65 1047.36 1165.03 937.30 1093.06 1030.51 840.19 748.77 906.45 871.90 982.82 978.99 1,083.66 874.72 1,011.39 967.32 56.13 52.15 59.2 73.83 69.83 68.37 81.37 62.58 81.67 63.19 TOTAL 29,779.76 27,775.86 2,003.90 9,934.53 9,266.21 668.32 Landfilled Tonnage 2,008.71 1,798.52 2,045.58 2,101.03 2,062.82 1,950.29 2,147.87 1,989.82 2,011.28 1,729.31 19,845.23 City 1,882.93 1,681.42 1,920.17 1,937.02 1,925.99 1,822.97 1,997.85 1,856.98 1,861.06 1,623.26 18,509.65 County 125.78 117.10 125.41 164.01 136.83 127.32 150.02 132.84 150.22 106.05 1,335.58 Recycled % Waste Diversion 1998/jr 11/9/98 30.85 30.81 32.07 31.04 33.79 34.94 35.17 32.02 35.21 37.34 33.36 Santa Ana River Flood Aotection Agency RECEIVED Don Martinson, Executive Director © C T 1 4 1998 COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT October 13, 1998 Costa Mesa Sanitary District Board of Directors P.O. Box 1200 Costa Mesa, CA 92628 -1200 Subject: Resolutions of Support for State and Federal Funding Dear Sirs: Several months ago, you passed resolutions of support for the state and federal funding of the Santa Ana River Mainstem Project. We believe your actions made a significant contribution to a partially successful funding program for the project for this year. At the state level, Orange County will receive about $20 million of state subvention funds. Also, a tentative commitment has been made for additional funding over the next four years. At the. federal level, Congress approved an appropriation of $44 million for the project. Although these funds are not sufficient to carry out all that was planned for the current construction scheduling, it will enable the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to keep working on the Seven Oaks Dam, which is a very important element of the total project. Unfortunately, it may not be possible to start any construction work at Prado Dam, and some work in the Lower Santa Ana River may be delayed. All elements of the entire Santa Ana River Mainstem Project are needed to provide the necessary flood protection to prevent damages in Orange County in the range of $15 billion. We will need to increase our efforts in 1999 to insure that funds are forthcoming to get the total job done. We look forward to your continued cooperation in working with our state and federal elected officials. We are available to answer any questions you or your staff may have about the progress of the construction of the project. Please feel free to call. Thanks again for your support. Sincerely, Donald Martinson Executive Director DJM:deb:810090835 P.O. Box 4048; Santa Ana, CA 92702 -4048 -- 300 N. Flower, Room 720; Santa Ana CA Phone (714) 834 -5142 — Fax (714) 8344572 COSTA MESA Costa Mesa Recycles A October 20, 1998 Board of Directors Costa Mesa Sanitary District 77 Fair Drive Costa Mesa, CA 92626 RE: Grease Interceptor Regulations Dear Board of Directors: • DISTRICT The Costa Mesa Sanitary District has no ordinances nor policies requiring grease traps or interceptors for restaurants. According to the statutes under which the District operates, the District does have the authority to adopt an ordinance requiring all new restaurants to install interceptors. DIRECTORS James Ferryman Arthur Perry Arlene Schafer Dan Worthington Nate Reade The District's boundaries include land in Costa Mesa and portions of Newport Beach and unincorporated Orange County. The City of Newport Beach does require interceptors for new or expanded restaurants while neither the City of Costa Mesa nor the County of Orange have any such regulation. Currently, both the City of Costa Mesa and the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) are studying the situation. There is no question that the number one cause of sewer backups and line problems in the District is grease from restaurants. The District averages probably one stoppage per month due to restaurant grease. Sometimes there is no damage, other times the problem becomes major, as is evidenced by a recent $25,000 settlement with a commercial establishment. Either way, the District's spill response team must make every effort to keep spills from entering the storm drain system, otherwise the Newport Bay and Pacific Ocean become contaminated and the District is subject to fines. The grease in the sewer system also causes the District to clean certain areas weekly as compared to normal line cleaning which is once per year. The District would incur a cost savings associated with grease trap requirements. It does appear that most of the proposed larger or chain restaurants have interceptors installed regardless of local regulations. This has certainly benefited the District. Were it not, for this trend, the District would probably have been forced to implement interceptor requirements in the past since stoppages would occur on a high frequency basis. FAX (714) 432 -1436 P.O. BOX 1200, COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92628 -1200 9 77 FAIR DRIVE • (714) 754 -5043 • • Board of Directors October 20, 1998 page 2 The sensitive area in requiring grease interceptors is the effect on small new restaurants. For instance, small restaurants frequently open in existing commercial strip centers where there are no interceptors. The property owner or new tenant would then be responsible for this cost which for a small restaurant owner is substantial. Additionally, not all small restaurants generate significant amounts of grease. Over the years District Staff has monitored the effect of restaurants on the sewer system. Field crews who are responsible for sewer line cleaning can certainly attest to the benefits of a grease interceptor ordinance. SDRMA would also look favorably upon such a regulation since it is a prudent risk management policy. It is probably the appropriate time for the Board of Directors to consider taking a formal position on grease interceptor regulations. The Board may want to do further investigation including considering the position taken by OCSD or the City of Costa Mesa. If OCSD were to adopt such a regulation it would make it mandatory throughout their service area which includes all of the Costa Mesa Sanitary District. Sincerely, _, qW, Robin B. Hamers Manager/District Engineer 0 • . A" RC 0 S TA ME S A S no,)r'��, D I ST R I CT Costa Mesa Recycles 0 October 19, 1998 DIRECTORS James Ferryman Arthur Perry Arlene Schafer Dan Worthington Nate Reale Mr. B111 Nunes Chief Plumbing/Mechanical Inspector City of Costa Mesa 77 Fair Drive Costa Mesa, CA i 92626 RE: Grease Interceptor Regulations Dear Bill: Thank you for your letter of October 12 1998 regarding the District's position on requirements for grease interceptors. The subject is currently being discussed at a Staff level and it is anticipated that the Board of Directors will take a formal position at their November 12, 1998 regular meeting. Alter subject meeting, I will respond to your letter. In the interim, please call me at (949) 631 -1731 if you have any questions Sincerely, /// I Robin B. Hamers Manager /District Engineer cc. Staff. FAX (714) 432 -1436 P.O. BOX 1200, COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92628 -1200 77 FAIR DRIVE • (714) 754 -5043 October 12, 1998 CITY OF COSTA MESA CALIFORNIA 92628 -1200 P.O. BOX 1200 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Mr. Robin Hamers Costa Mesa Sanitary District P. O. Box 1200 Costa Mesa, CA 92628 -1200 RE: GREASE TRAPANTERCEPTOR Dear Mr. Hamers: r 0 C T 1 2 1998 I am inquiring about the Costa Mesa Sanitary District's regulations or policies regarding cooking grease in the sewer system. There is a particular concern regarding grease trap /interceptors for small eateries or establishments, which seem to be on a tight budget and do not generate appreciable grease to justify this substantial expense. Does the Costa Mesa Sanitary District have a problem with grease in our sewers system? Could you please respond with your views on this issue. It will assist us with our requirement(s) in the Building Division. The plumbing code leaves the decision to the Building Official. Your response to this issue would be appreciated. If you have any questions, you may reach me at 754 -5629, between 7 -7:30 am or 4 -5 pm. Sincerely, BILL NUKES Chief Plumbing/Mechanical Inspector /bjk 77 FAIR DRIVE Building Division (714) 754 -5273 Code Enforcement (714) 754 -5623 Planning Division (714) 754 -5245 FAX (714) 754 -4856 TDD (714) 754 -5244 ST1 %TE OF L-ALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT F TRANSPORTATION ENCkOACkMENT PERMI -W Permit No. TR -0120 (NEW 9/91) 11298-NI In compliance with (check one): X Your application of SEPTEMBER 25, 1998 Utility Notice No. of Agreement No. R/W Contract No. of of TO: [COSTA�MESA SANITARY DISTRICT 234 E. 17TH STREET SUITE 205 COSTA MESA, CA 92627 12 -ORA- VAR -VAR OCTOBER 13, 1998 $ EXEMPT 1$ $ NA Bond Company Bond Nwnber (1) 1 Bond Number (2) THIS PERMIT EXPIRES OCTOBER 30, 2000. ATTN: ROBIN B. HAMERS PHONE: 949/631 -1731 , PERMITTEE and subject to the following, PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED to: Perform routine maintenance and make emergency repairs to the District's existing sewer facilities located within the State right -of -way, all in accordance with current Caltrans Standard Specification and Standard Plans, Section 600 (Utilities) of the Encroachment Permits Manual, and the attached Provisions. Permittee shall contact State Permit Inspector DON PERUZZI at 949/724 -2152 between 7:00 AM and 9:00 AM a minimum of two working days prior to the start of work on each occasion. Failure to comply with this requirement will result in suspension of this permit. The following attachments are also included as pail of this permit. (Check applicable): X Yes No General Provisions _ Yes _ No Utility Maintenance Provisions X Yes _ No Special Provisions Yes _ No A Cal -OSHA permit required prior to beginning work; In addition to fee the permittee will be billed actual costs for: Yes X No Review _ Yes X No Inspection X Yes Field Work # I (If any Caltrans effort expended) Yes _ No The information in the environmental documentation has been reviewed and considered prior to approval of this permit. This permit is void unless the work is completed before OCTOBER 30, 2000. This permit is to be strictly construed and no other work other than specifically mentioned is hereby authorized. No project work shall be commenced until all other necessary permits and environmental clearances have been obtained. Distribution: APPROVED: DON PERUZZI - PERMIT INSPECTOR cc:(without attachments) Orange Maintenance (2 copies) Mike McManus, D Saied Hashenti, District Permit Engineer o FATE C.`.` CALiFORNiA . DEPART IVI ' ' Oi= TRAivSPORTATiON Page 1 STANDARD ENCROACINT PERMIT APPLICATION PART A TR -0100 (REV. 8/97) FOR CALTRANS USE Permission is requested to encroach on the State Highway Right of PERMIT NO. r- /�/ U , c6 _ v 7 G /2V Way as follows: (Complete all items: NA if not applicable.) Application is not complete until all required attachments are included: DIST /CO /RTE/PM Z 1. COUNTY 2. ROUTE 3. POSTMILE SIMPLEX STAMP Orange Various ❑ MAILBOX EXTENTIONS, HOOKUPS 4. ADDRESS OR STREET NAME 5. CITY Various Costa Mesa /Newport Beach 980736 from OF RIGHT OF WAY 6. CROSS STREET (Distance and direction site) 7. PORTION Various 8. WORK TO BE PERFORMED BY 9. EST. START DATE 10. EST. COMPLETION DATE OF�s IM/P�'EX STAMP ® OWN FORCES ❑ CONTRACTOR DATE fir' /S /Yp 12 67N 11. MAX. DEPTH 2 AVG. DEPTH 13. AVG. WIDTH 14. LENGTH 15. SURFACE TYPE EST. COST IN STATE RAN EXCAVATION 116. 17. TYPE Routine 18. DIAMETER 19. VOLTAGE / PSIG 20. PRODUCT PIPES Sewer Maint. & Repair FULLY DESCMEE `"'AO1 `"MTHIN grATF RfW (Pdc!iflonal sr».. on rpuersP tide if neede ft Attach complete plans (minimum 5 sets folded 21.6 centimeter X 28 centimenter (8.5' X 11')) specs, calcs, maps, etc., if applicable. Requested is a two -year maintenance permit to perform miscellaneous routine repair and maintenance work on sanitary sewer lines and manholes located within State right -of -way. See attached copy of previous two -year permit. YOUR OWN REFERENCE NO. Has any other Caltrans Department reviewed your.plans? 7 YES 7X NO 22. Is any work being done on applicant's property? ❑ YES © NO (It 'YES," briefly describe in section x21, and attach site and grading plans.) 23. Is a city, county, or other agency involved in the environmental approval? ❑ YES (Check documentation type and attach approved copy) ❑ CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT ❑ N.D. ❑ EIR ® NO (Check the category below in section 23a, which describes the project) 23 a. ❑ FLAGS, SIGNS, BANNERS, ❑ CONSTRUCTION / MODIFICATION OF ❑ CON .° (RUCTION, RECONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE, OR DECORATIONS, PARADES AND SIGNALS OR ANY OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL RESURFACING OF A DRIVEWAY OR ROAD APPROACH CELEBRATIONS SYSTEMS AND DEVICES, INCLUDING El DITCH PAVING ADDITION OF NEW ELEMENTS. El ADDITION OR REPLACEMENT OF ROADWAY DEVICES OR MARKINGS (GLARE SCREEN, BARRIER, LIGHTING, STRIPING, ❑ FENCE FX] PUBLIC UTILITY MODIFICATIONS. MARKERS, ETC.) ❑ MOVIE, TV FILMING ❑ MAILBOX EXTENTIONS, HOOKUPS ❑ SIDEWALKS/ GUTTERS ❑ EROSION CONTROL ❑ REPAIR! kAAILITFNANCF ng: FX!STING HIGHWAYS ❑ SURVEY ❑ NONE OF THE ABOVE (if project cannot be described in above categories, request application Part B from the Permit Office.) 23 b. Does this project cause a substantial change in the significance of a historical resource? (If 'YES,' request application Part 'B" from ❑ YES ZX NO the Permit Office) 23 c. Is this project on an existing highway or street where the activity involves removal of a scenic resource including a stand of trees, a rock outcroppng or a historic building? ❑ YES © NO (if 'YES," request application Part "B' from the Permit Office) The undersigned agrees and understands that a permit can be denied or a bond required for non - payment of prior or present permit fees, that the work will be done in accordance with Caltrans rules and regulations subject to inspection and approval, and that permit fees may still be due when an application is withdrawn or denied, and that a denial may be appealed in accordance with California Streets and Highways Code, Section 671.5. 24. ORGANIZATION OR APPLICANT NAME (Print or Type) 25. BUSINESS PHONE Costa Mesa Sanitary District 949/631 -1731 26. ARCHITECT, ENGINEER OR PROJECT MANAGER NAME (Print or Type) 27. BUSINESS PHONE Robin B. Hamers 949/631 -1731 28. BUSINESS ADDRESS (include City and Zip Code) 234f. 17th Street, Suite 205, Costa Mesa, CA 92627 29. AUTH R D SIGNATURE 30. PRINT OR TYPE NAME 31.TITLE 32. DATE (� ",� Robin B. Hamers IManager/DiRt- PnQ; APr a /�5 /aQ Page STANDARD ENCROACHMENT PERMIT APP1,1CATION TR -0100 (REV. 8/97) 21. Description of work (continued) FEE CALCULATION - FOR CALTRANS USE ❑ EXEMPT ❑ PROJECT EA — — — — — — ❑ CASH/CHECK ❑ CREDIT CARD ❑ DEFERRED BILLING (Utlity) ❑ AS ❑ AX ❑ SET FEE (2) CALCULATED BY (1) 2. FEE / DEPOSIT DAT E FEE / DEPOSIT 1. FEE / DEPOSIT DATE REVIEW $ 1. HOURS @ $�— • $ 2 —HOURS @ $ —r • 2. FEE t DEPOSIT DATE TOTAL FEE DEPOSIT 1. FEE / DEPOSIT DATE INSPECTION $ 1. HOURS @ $�— • $ —�� $ 2 HOURS @ $--- FIELD WORK $ _HOURS @ $�— • $ $ CASH DEPOSIT IN $ LIEU OF BOND $ TOTAL COLLECTED $ $ $ CASHIER'S INITIALS District Office staff do not have authori to modify this rate. AMOUNT • The current hourly rate is set annually by Headquarters Accounting. DATE PERFORMANCE BOND AMOUNT DATE PAYMENT BOND AMOUNT LIABILITY INSURANCE REQUIRED? ❑ YES ❑ NO $ FM 91 1403 N STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT TRANSPORTATION ENCROACHMENT PERMIT GENERAL PROVISIONS TR -0045 (REV. 8/98) 1. AUTHORITY: The Department's authority to issue encroachment Permits is provided under, Div. 1, Chpt. 3, Art. 1, Sect. 660 to 734 of the Streets and Highways Code. 2. REVOCATION: Encroachment permits are revocable on five days notice unless otherwise stated on the permit and except as provided by law for public corporations, franchise holders, and utilities. These General Provisions and the Encroachment Permit Utility Provisions are subject to modification or abrogation at any time. Permittees' joint use agreements, franchise rights, reserved rights or any other agreements for operating purposes in State highway right of way are exceptions to this revocation. 3. DENIAL FOR NONPAYMENT OF FEES: Failure to pay permit fees when due can result in rejection of future applications and denial of permits. 4. ASSIGNMENT: No party other than the permittee or permittee's authorized agent is allowed to work under this permit. Specifications fritfic control systems. These General Provisions are not intended to impose upon the Permittee, by thud parties, any duty or standard of care, greater than or different from, as required by law. 15. MINIMUM INTERFERENCE WITH TRAFFIC: Permittee shall plan and conduct work so as to create the least possible inconvenience to the traveling public; traffic shall not be unreasonably delayed. On conventional highways, permittee shall place properly attired tlagger(s) to stop or warn the traveling public in compliance with the Manual of Traffic Controls and Instructions to Flaggers Pamphlet. 16. STORAGE OF EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS: Equipment and material storage in State right of way shall comply with Standard Specifications, Standard Plans, and Special Provisions.- Whenever the Permittee places an obstacle within 3.63 m (12) feet of the traveled way, the permittee shall place temporary railing (Type K). 17. CARE OF DRAINAGE: Permittee shall provide alternate drainage for any work interfering with an existing drainage facility in compliance with the Standard Specifications, Standard Plans and/or as directed by the Department's representative. 5. ACCEPTANCE OF PROVISIONS: Permittee understands and 18. agrees to accept these General Provisions and all attachments to this permit, for any work to be performed under this permit. 6. BEGINNING OF WORK: When traffic is not impacted (see Number 35), the permittee shall notify the Department's representative, two (2) days before the intent to start permitted work.- Permittee shall notify the Department's Representative if the work is to be interrupted for a period of five (5) days or more, unless otherwise agreed upon. All work shall be performed on weekdays. during regular work hours, excluding holidays. unless otherwise specified in this permit. 7. STANDARDS OF CONSTRUCTION: All work performed within highway right of way shall conform to recognized construction standards and current Department Standard Specifications, Department Standard Plans High and Low Risk Facility Specifications, and Utility Special Provisions. Where reference is made to "Contractor and Engineer," these are amended to be read as "Permittee and Department representative." 8. PLAN CHANGES: Changes to plans, specifications, and permit provisions are not allowed without prior approval from the State representative. RESTORATION AND REPAIRS IN RIGHT OF WAY: Permittee is responsible for restoration and repair of State highway right of way resulting from permitted work (State Streets and Highways Code, Sections 670 et. seq.). 19, RIGHT OF WAY CLEAN UP: Upon completion of work, Permittee-shall-remove and dispose of all scraps,— brush, timber, . materials, etc. off the right of way. The aesthetics of the highway shall be as it was before work started. rr 20. COST OF WORK: Unless stated in the permit, or a separate written agreement, the permittee shall bear all costs incurred for work within the State right of way and waives all claims for indemnification or contribution from the State. 21. ACTUAL COST BILLING: When specified in the permit, the Department will bill the permittee actual costs at the currently set hourly rate for encroachment permits. 22 AS -BUILT PLANS: When required, permittee shall submit one (1) set of as -built plans in compliance with Department's requirements. Plans shall be submitted within thirty (30) days after completion and approval of work. 9. INSPECTION AND APPROVAL: All work is subject to monitoring and inspection. Upon completion of work, permittee shall request a final inspection for acceptance and approval by the Department, The local agency permittee shall not give final construction approval to its contractor until final acceptance and approval by the Department is obtained. 23, 10. PERMIT AT WORKSITE: Permittee shall keep the permit package or a copy thereof. at the work site and show it upon request to any Department representative or law enforcement officer. If the permit package is not kept and made available at the work site. the work shall be suspended. 11. CONFLICTING ENCROACHMENTS: Permittee shall yield st-.t of work to ongoing, prior authorized, work adjacent to or within the 24. limits of the project site. When existing encroachments conflict with new work, the permittee shall bear all cost for rearrangements, (e.g., relocation, alteration, removal, etc.). 12. PERMITS FROM OTHER AGENCIES: This permit is invalidated if the permittee has not obtained all permits necessary and required by law, from the Public Utilities Conunission of the State of California (PUC), California Occupational Safety and Health Administration (Cal- OSHA), or any other public agency having jurisdiction. 13. PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLIST SAFETY: A cafe minimum passageway of 1.21 meter (4') shall be maintained through the work area at existing pedestrian or bicycle facilities . At no time shall pedestrians be diverted onto a portion of the street used for vehicular traffic. At locations where safe alternate paa,t_lcways cannot be provided, appropriate signs and barricades shall he installed at the limits of construction and in advance of the limits of construction at the nearest crosswalk or intersection to detour pedestrians to facilities across the street. 14. PUBLIC TRAFFIC CONTROL: As required by law. the permittee shall provide traffic control protection warning signs, lights, safety devices, etc., and take all other measures necessary for traveling 25. public's safety. Day and night time lane closures shall comply with the Manuals of Traffic Controls, Standard Plans, and Standard As -Built plans or accompanying correspondence shall not include disclaimer statements of any kind. Such statements shall constitute non - compliance with.,these provisions. Failure to provide complete and signed As -Built plans shall be cause for bond or deposit retention by the Department. PERMITS FOR RECORD PURPOSES ONLY: When work in the right of way is within an area under a Joint Use Agreement (JUA) or a Consent to Common Use Agreement (CCUA), a fee exempt permit is issued to the permittee for the purpose of providing a notice and record of work. The Permittee's prior rights shall be preserved without the intention of creating new or different rights or obligations. "Notice and Record Purposes Only" shall be stamped across the face of the permit. BONDING: The permittee shall file bond(s), in advance, in the amount set by the Department. Failure to maintain bond(s) in full force and effect will result in the Department stopping of all work and revoking permit(s). Bonds are not required of public corporations or privately owned utilities, unless permittee failed to comply with the provision and conditions under a prior permit. The surety company is responsible for any latent defects as provided in California Code of Civil Procedures. Section 337.15. Local agency permittee shall comply with requirements established as follows: In recognition that project construction work done on State property will not be directly funded and paid by State, for the purpose of protecting stop notice claimants and the interests of State relative to successful project completion, the local agency permittee agrees to require the construction contractor fumish both a payment and performance bond in the local agency's name with both bonds complying with the requirements set forth in Section 3 -1.02 of State's current Standard Specifications before performing any project construction work. The local agency permittee shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the State, its officers and employees from all project construction related claims by contractors and all stop notice or mechanic's lien claimants. The local agency also agrees to remedy, in a timely manner and to State's satisfaction, any latent defects occurring as a result of the project construction work. FUTURE MOVING OF INSTALLATIONS: Permittee understands and agrees to rearrange a permitted installation upon request by the Department, for State construction, reconstruction, or maintenance work on the highway. The permittee at his sole expense, unless under a prior agreement, 1UA, or a CCUA, shall comply with said request. 26. ARCHAEOLOGICAL/HISTORICAL: If any archaeological or historical resources are revealed in the work vicinity, the permittee shall immediately stop work, notify the Department's representative, retain a qualified archaeologist who shall evaluate the site, and make recommendations to the Department representative regarding the continuance of work. 27. PREVAILING WAGES: Work performed by or under a permit may require permittee's contractors and subcontractors to pay appropriate prevailing wages as set by the Department of Industrial Relations. Inquiries or requests for interpretations relative to 31 enforcement of prevailing wage requirements are directed to State of California Department of Industrial Relations, 525 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California 94102. 28. RESPONSIBU ITY FOR DAMAGE: The State of California and all officers and employees thereof, including but not limited to the Director of Transportation and the Deputy Director, shall not be answerable or accountable in any manner for injury to or death of any person, including but not limited to the permittee, persons employed by the permittee, persons acting in behalf of the permittee, or for damage to property from any cause. The permittee shall be responsible for any liability imposed by law and for injuries to or death of any person, including but not limited to the permittee, persons employed by the permittee, persons acting in behalf of the permiittee, or for damage to property arising out of work, or other activity permitted and done by the permittee under a permit, or arising out of the failure on the permittee's part to perform his obligations under any permit in respect to maintenance or any other obligations, or resulting from defects or obstructions. or from any cause whatsoever during the progress of the work. or other activity or at any subsequent time, work or other activity is being performed under the obligations provided by and contemplated by the permit. The permittee shall indemnify and save harmless the State of California, all officers, employees, and State's contractors, thereof, including but not limited to the Director of Transportation and the Deputy Director , from all claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought for or on account of injuries to or death of any person, including but not limited to the permittee, persons employed by the permittee, persons acting in behalf of the permittee and the public, or damage to property resulting from the performance of work or other activity under the permit, or arising out of the failure on the permittee's part to perform his obligations under any permit in respect to maintenance or any other obligations, or resulting from defects or obstructions, or from any cause whatsoever during the progress of the work, or other activity or at any subsequent time, work or other activity is being performed under the obligations provided by and contemplated by the permit, except as otherwise provided by statute. The duty of the permittee to indemnify and save harmless includes the duties to defend as set forth in Section 2778 of the Civil Code. The permittee waives any and all rights to any type of expressed or implied indemnity against the State, its officers, employees, and State contractors. It is the intent of the parties that the permittee will indemnify and hold harmless the State, its officers, employees. and State's contractors, from any and all claims, suits or actions as set firth above regardless of the existence or degree of fault or negligence, whether active or passive, primary or secondary, on the part of the State, the permittee, persons employed by the permittee. or acting on behalf of the permittee. For the purpose of this section, "State's contractors" shall include contractors and their subcontractors under contract to the State of Califomia performing work within the limits of this permit. 29. \O PRECEDENT ESTABLISHED: This permit is issued with the understanding that it does not establish a precedent. 30. FEDERAL CIVIL RIGHTS REQUIREMENTS FOR PUBLIC ACCOMMODATION: A. The permittee, for himself, his personal representative, successors in interest. and assigns as part of the c. nsideration hereof, does hereby covenant and agree that: I: No person on the grounds of race. color, or national origin shall be excluded from participation in, be denied the henetits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination in the use of ,aid facilities. 2. That in connection with the construction of an} improvements on ,aid lands and the furnishings of services thereon. no discrimination shall be practiced in the selection and retention of first -tier . ubcontractors in the selection of second -tier subcontractors. 3. That such discrimination shall not be practiced against the public in their access to and use of the facilities and services provided for • public accommodations (such as eating, sleeping, rest, recreation), and operation on, over, or under the space of the right of way. 4. That the permittee shall use the premises in compliance with all other requirements imposed pursuant to Title 15, Code of Federal Regulations, Commerce and Foreign Trade, Subtitle A. Office of the Secretary of Commerce, Part 8 (15 C.F.R. Pan 8) and as said Regulations may be amended. B. That in the event of breach of any of the above nondiscrimination covenants, the State shall have the right to terminate the permit and to re -enter and repossess said land and the land and the facilities thereon, and hold the same as if said permit had never been made or issued. MAINTENANCE OF HIGHWAYS: The permittee agrees, by acceptance of a permit, to properly maintain any encroachment. This assurance requires the permittee to provide inspection and repair any damage, at permittee's expense, to State facilities resulting from the encroachment. 32. SPECIAL EVENTS: In accordance with subdivision (a) of Streets and Highways Code Section 682.5, the Department of Transportation shall not be responsible for the conduct or operation of the permitted activity, and the applicant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the State and the city or county against any and all claims arising out of any activity for which the permit is issued. Perrnittee understands and agrees that it will comply with the obligations of Titles li and III of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 in the conduct of the event, and further agrees to indemnify and save harmless the State of California, all officers and employees thereof, including but not limited to the Director of Transportation, from any claims or liability arising out of or by virtue df said Act. 33. PRIVATE USE OF RIGHT OF WAY: Highway right of way shall not be used for private purposes without compensation to the State. The gifting of public property use and therefore public funds is prohibited under the California Constitution, Article 16. 34, FIELD WORK REIMBURSEMENT: Permittee shall reimburse State for field work performed on permittee's behalf to correct or remedy hazards or damaged facilities, or clear debris not attended to by the permittee. 35. Notification of Department and TMC: The permittee shall notify the Department's representative and the Traffic Management Center (TMC) at least 7 days before initiating a lane closure or conducting an activity that may cause a traffic impact. A confirmation notification should occur 3 days before closure or other potential traffic impacts. In emergency situations when the corrective work or the emergency itself may affect traffic, TMC and the Department's representative shall be notified as soon as possible. 36. Underground Service Alert (USA) Notification: Any excavation requires compliance with the provisions of Government Code Section 4216 et. seq., including , but not limited to notice to a regional notification center, such as Underground Service Alert (USA). The permittee shall provide notification at least 48 hours before performing any excavation work within the right of way. LOS ANGL COUNTY ! W rrnER_ • • • • • • •• • •� �.\ SAN BERNARDINO ♦♦• }• •� \ COUNTY `J FULLERTON • • \'� �•� • PLACENTIA•• • • • RIVERSIDE �-- lr♦ �•a•: • • • • • RIVERSIDE • • •a • • CNRO �. COUNTY do- •. • • `a• \ Luo ANAHEIM•• ¢4• 3 ��� \ •• o¢ • GARDEN • •ORANGE • .�. reoncra GROVE •- pw,._ '- SEAL BEACH Tacific TUSTIN ��?= SANAA W• aP ♦ 00r G Route Conventional Highways 01 Pacific Coast Highway 39 Beach and Whittier Blvd. "E" 55 Newport Blvd. 72 Whittier Blvd. 73 MacArthur Blvd. 74 Ortega Hwy. 90 Imperial Hwy. 133 Laguna Canyon Rd. 142 1 Carbon Canyon Rd. IRVINE • ♦� � _ _ COSTA ♦ �K� ♦#0 '9>. MESA ♦ • •9y ♦�ti \ 9 e�q9, NEWPORT •e'�. ■ ♦ �� °v / BEACH 9'a ♦ °� °oN / ♦ ♦� +r ♦♦ ♦ MISSION ■ ♦ •./ /. ♦. ■ ■ VIEJO ■ sae 4 /• LAGUNA ■ ■ ■ / EACH ■ e / ♦ oP��" * ■ ♦ ♦♦ ♦ • 41•♦ I RIVERSIDE ♦ ■ j COUNTY Ocean O DANA #1 0 �NT ♦ SAN JUAN ♦ ♦ CAPISTRANO ♦ I SAN DIEGO DISTRICT 12 •'• ♦ COUNTY PERMIT INSPECTOR TERRITORIES District -Office - (714) 724 -2260 2501 Pullman St., Santa Ana, 92705 Field Office 2501 Pullman St., Santa Ana, 92705 Field Suoervisor Ashcraft, Bob Permit Inspectors Area • • • • • Shaken, Hossein Peruzzi, Don s u m m o n Schaper, Bob Permits Inspector - Electrical Curl, Robert In Emergencies, please call the Caltrans Communications Center (714) 724 -2607. Phone No. 724 -2266 724 -2787 724 -2152 724 -2567 724 -2844 12/97 ♦ SAN CLEMENTE jr* t 1 0 ] 4 6 Sett M Otte ORANGE COUNTY CITY MANAGERS' ASSOCIATION TO: ORANGE COUNTY CITY MANAGERS FROM: JIM ARMSTRONG, PRESIDENT, OCCMA CITY MANAGER, FULLERTON DATE: OCTOBER 8, 1998 SUBJECT: IWMD ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT — 1997 -98 Attached for your information is the review completed by Laith Ezzet of Hilton Farnkopf & Hobson, LLC, of the Integrated Waste Management Department's Annual Financial Report for Fiscal Year 1997 -98. I think you'll find in reviewing the report that the Integrated Waste Management Department is ahead of the financial projections that were made when we entered into the agreement with the County in 1997. However, as Laith points out, we do need to continue to closely watch the performance of the County system, should a downturn in the economy occur. If you have any questions about the report, feel free to contact Laith directly, or any member of the Solid Waste Working Group. JLA:dja Attachment Copy to: Jan Mittermeier, County CEO Vicki Wilson, IWMD • • REVIEW OF THE INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT'S ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1997/98 October 5, 1998 Prepared by: Hilton Farnkopf & Hobson, LLC 3990 Westerly Place, Suite 195 Newport Beach, California 92660 -2311 Phone: 714/251 -8628 Facsimile: 714/251 -9741 This document is printed on recycled paper and copied on both sides to reduce waste. HF H HILTON FARNKOPF & HOBSON, LLC 0 HILTON FARNKOPF & HOBSON, LLC ail it Advisory Services to Municipal Management 3990 Westerly Place, Suite 195 Fremont Newport Beach, California 92660-23 11 Newport Beach Telephone: 949/251-8628 Sacramento Fax: 949/251 -9741 October 5, 1998 Mr. Jim Armstrong City Manager City of Fullerton 303 West Commonwealth Fullerton, CA 92832 Review of the Integrated Waste Management Department's Annual Financial Report for Fiscal Year 1997/98 Dear Mr. Armstrong: Hilton Farnkopf & Hobson, LLC (HF &H) has completed its review of the Annual Financial Report for Fiscal Year 1997/98 (Annual Report) prepared; by the Orange County Integrated Waste Management Department (IWMD). The, enclosed report describes the background, objectives, scope of work, approach, limnitations, and findings from our review. Study Objectives The objectives of the study were to: Review changes in key economic and since the 10 -year Disposal Agreements negotiated in 1997; and, . of maintaining the $22.00 per ton gate fee during the on information contained in the Department's first Evaluate the reasonableness remainder of the term base d Annual Financial Report. tonnage assumptions that have occurred between the cities and the County were Summary of Findings i Our findings, which are described in the enclosed report, are summarized below. 1. Increases in County waste have offset reductions in import waste. Over the 9- year projection period ending in 2006, cumulative total revenues are projected to be approximately $103 million higher in the 1998 Annual Report compared to the 1997 Original Pro Forma. recycled 0 paper dft =E`er HILTON FARNKOPF & HOBSON, LLC Mr. Jim Armstrong October 5, 1998 Page 2 2. Total cumulative operating and capital expenditures over the 9 -year projection period ending in 2006 are projected to be $40 million higher in the 1998 Annual Report compared to the 1997 Original Pro Forma. 3. Projected amounts to be sent "upstream" to the General Fund are projected to decrease by $13 million over the nine -year period ending 2006 compared to the 1997 Original Pro Forma. 4. Although the 1998 Annual Report projects increased total system tonnage compared to the 1997 Original Pro Forma, the Annual Report projects a reduced accrued closure and postclosure liability. 5. Based on the 1998 Annual Report assumptions, IWMD's total cash, compared to anticipated liabilities, is projected to improve by nearly $82 million by 2006, compared to the projections in the 1997 Original Pro Forma. 6. While the $22 per ton gate fee could be maintained for an additional six years through 2012, IWMD would utilize a significant portion of its excess reserves and its cash balance would decline. However, its total cash balance would still exceed the target amount based on projected accrued liabilities. 7. The Annual Financial Report could be enhanced by adding projected closure and postclosure liabilities, projected reserve fund balances, and projected target cash balances. Conclusion The ability of IWMD to continue to operate at a gate fee of $22 per ton for in- County waste depends on continued receipt of waste volumes that meet or exceed the original projections. The system currently appears to be financially sound based on the projections prepared by IWMD. Of course, the dramatic increase in waste quantities received also points to the inherent volatility of eneration and disposal activities. If a similarly dramatic downturn in waste volumes were to occur and continue for a period of a few years, the financial position of IWMD could deteriorate quickly. Notwithstanding this possibility, the first year of the waste disposal agreements appears to have been a financial success for the System. recydeC `J Paper HILTON FARNKOPF & HOBSON, LLC Mr. Jim Armstrong October 5, 1998 Page 3 We are pleased to have had this opportunity to assist the City Managers Working Group on Solid Waste with this review. We would like to thank IWMD Director Vicki Wilson and her staff for the excellent cooperation and support during the study process. If there are any questions about this report, please call me at 949/251- 8902. Very truly yours, Laith Ezzet, CMC Vice President recycled % paper TO: Costa Mesa Sanitary District Board of Directors, Rob Hamers, Manager /District Engineer FROM: Ron Shef, Ordinance Enforcement Officer DATE: October 25, 1998 SUBJECT: ORDINANCE ENFORCEMENT SUMMARY REPORT This report includes the five (5) week period beginning September 21, 1998 and ending October 25, 1998. Ordinance enforcement in the five collection areas was continued while also maintaining scavenger patrol in all areas. Exempt status verification is winding down -with more than eighty percent of addresses having been checked. Week No. 1 ending September 27, 1998: This week's monitoring resulted in twenty -seven (27) flyers being left as courtesy reminders to encourage compliance. Week No. 2 ending October 4, 1998: During this week twenty (20) flyers were left at residences. Two complaints were investigated and verified with Staff. Week No. 3 ending October 11, 1998: Monitoring this week resulted in twenty -three (23) flyers being left at residences. An inquiry from the Wallace Ave. Improvement Group was received. District letters were sent to property owners that had been given courtesy notices on several occasions for non - compliance. The area is continually being monitored by the Enforcement Officer. Week No. 4 ending October 18, 1998: This week was used to update the exempt status list. Three hundred forty (340) addresses were checked and verified. These addresses comprised more than fifteen hundred (1500) residences. Week No. 5 ending October 25, 1998: This final week of the period resulted in thirty -five (35) courtesy flyers being left for residents. During this week one scavenger was stopped in his vehicle for collecting newspaper bundles while he was delivering the Register Breeze to resi- dences. He was warned after documenting his license and drivers information. �cJK PE2i oD ST/)r2.� 9 /21 /yg END /0/2.5'/98 Date Street Index Address Street Name Code Enforcement Report Description of Violation Ortinn 9 2z q8 2 270 -2857 6o, t I/srA D .644 s /•0 sre,5x-T- /�.�,e /.'-r67Z- rr 7Q // ¢ �cv 17 �onJi. /.v ✓ /ErJ rr b/o q 23 98 6Z,/ o /(0 94- /9A //u T s Ar �✓�4 /BEGS. , /! Cc�AsrE FyoZ rr 58�D /(022 /E(A Sus s ��E' EXcE'5S 6A &S cavfAn-_t> 4/0 272 9 D2AeE A Go.� , —. �� ✓i�nJ ���v �,;vK �� YE- n 4-930 e4 3 lt�AG> r� S A-cyM 7-72s a-, 0213 EGS. T;96 rr 3/2o 883 dteTE --:;�- S C0"7- /"L) ✓ /�-� >`iti� G� y ,r Co 050 %,7 it 'r -r it 10 -47 Pr7- C4..),2f3 11 ' 4.720 275 � Cv.�T, :N Vim rr 9 2¢198 376,-O 2564- 69b"rm rr 1970 2-2-0 AVAI-0,0 S o %J #r 2750 2-046 ch(AaLE �. COA) .. It q 2039 rr ,r ,r rr 111 /99l`1997 1/4e1 5 Oo.vTn� r,�IZ4 A)K /(020 752 GtJ. 20 ri+ S. G'v•� J- r� ✓iE-�,) " 7�96 2010 ( At1-AGE A -r C""26 It 8 202-6 /r C�A-)T: /rJ VItt -11d r► 4. E Code Enforcement Report Date Street Index Address Street Name Description of Violation Action 912+170 4go 2078 A aiJi. ,•.) ViEr • 1 r r 2082 — 2086 S, rr r r 2 / o ¢ eO- )-rlA) b&gwDC,4, —rD Piga? ? f���D O t�rc 7Z0 6;A= r' it /N liiEAO 929 9� 2440 6-770 I SSG /'H2os �' G'v.�T. • •v ✓ICJFP� -t� ,r 6,9OO 286 2 s"TIi'(.lrjgoLr /2 . r �, �► /830 298/ 47,)D2OS s' �C3AG A� c✓2(3 �r .r rr 29%4 rr iAJ 1/1 EZJ rr A'!"c✓Ie-6 /%v ✓ /E11i �� 20 i 96' CUMGGAt�i IGlX- �.oc.J �O 40,95E St4 AL-LEY �PACETD DY.JNE72./4DNSE7) 57�}F ID 2 9I' � 5"9v 2vl I C/i14NGE A" /'"ov,2 l�a-FS ,4T- cv2.a - T�}p>cn ��i� �zyE� 20'=`" S 1�W'T' ink ✓1 e7J �1 „ — OVEJ2.�JEIG+rT- Ai- 7, rr / S/ o 3 3 / & �i,. CCWT ^7-- Ct,-'26 < < AT-( AS A,01> r,v VIE-k) •, 330 r' Cow- i �J i/i EtiJ n 1 r r 304-- 2 /�c- E 9 Code Enforcement Report nata Strpat lnriex Address Street Name Description of Violation Action 3/� 0 11 ('590 60C C, s 4,77- C0 2 3 i,J ✓ice q- ., tr X930 3034- q 2050 1594 /I /F ,r , ►t 5�90 /� 4S �A�A� /� �, ►► 1X30 2 ArJD2os „ ► l ►t 2790 2925 (:srvv,- �r R►�D X2(3 �► , 390 2957 PC, Y", P.", l� Co,.� T .,� ✓i�v r, ► 2 �37 H t' 29 2q r ri �r P <s 2E/1�cyuE�y rl rr 2737 tr ►► 272 , ,� ,. 1011 9f 6370 / 9 9 osEM R vcfF �a-� cv/z,3 vim/ � s. 7-v 2 >r % 3/� 0 11 r Code Enforcement Report Date Street Index Address Street Name Description of Violation Action 4�,/ CJ -306 9-LE S. COUCH o.-) PA2. <51DE 00--: D,e✓ AY /l (0 /078 SHi-VA Dot �. OA G- A-i �►,J2(� ��l� ��yG� /0 8 if &oho 4-3? 0VA)7 ,4T CvlL6 loll 9f 74-20 2 2-5 1�2G- ii✓i�4 GOA)z- /A) V1 E14) ,c 5'90 Z74-04- E)eA")c,.- A. ,r Ill.) S%lze,-T /G.EcrS (J.C[JEf2yC ,� 2�zo 303 Cow P e-VA)—. /A) ✓IEI'L) 311 /r •, 4480 l!3zq 4,4 ,� 2312 // •/ •, •� / &6-0 267 2 ,-5 S G'o,�r. ,�+ C a ..0 0 E/, < < �, ii 2 3L 8 /� SiX Co,�T. � e✓� 6 /, n �Goc� 2/2 S'n►1 s/� A. SiX /3A� s /w� Cv2,6SAKE7-0 !s/Do�S Nay -ion 4�,/ CJ Code Enforcement Report Date Street Index Address Street Name Description of Violation Action 101/9 q F G Goo 2 13 SAS rABEL A �4�CE�es �- �✓✓2L3 �C �= T Pi�JK l GS. 11 �� /O 2 9 i /U—,---SA D OAG •ter cv26 PIA) ,< /52YC-72 1 2 ° 920 3093 /�A �Ei 2A /.3AG5 A7' C�24 ►► �► 307& N ✓i�c,� ii It 3/(00 3047 all my It It if 3029 /i '° „ ►► 4-(040 3168 Z1M,5-21uc L Go,JT. /A) ✓� EyJ ► 4-700 /29'4- � i► /278 NO /305 G-rDt jo ab S " ► � ► 7.63o 3 /03 li E?,) L- ►� ('4/0 3c�� 12oyc� L ,� 7r3o 3050 Gt%2r L !3q6- ATcv24 � 11 3 Q4 ri- /l ► �� 3ck5% 5�s 9 October 29, 1998 t TTEN COMMTJNICAT� ONS TY OF COSTA MESA CALIFORNIA 92628 -1200 FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICES Tel -Phil enterprises Barbara Gomez, Acting Operations Manager P.O. Box 11929 Costa Mesa, CA 92627 Dear- Ms. Gomez: P.O. BOX 1200 RECEIVED 0 0 T 2 9 1998 1STA MfG6 _j, Y f}jU o I am sorry to report that the America Recycles Day event scheduled for Sunday, November 15, 1998 at the Orange County Marketplace has been cancelled. Due to other commitments by the Orange County Recycling Coordinators group, and difficulties in procuring the needed recycled items for display, we decided to forego the event this year. Hopefully, with more advanced planning, we will be able to organize an event at the Orange County Marketplace for next year's America Recycles Day. I would like to thank you for your assistance, and I apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused. I look forward to working with Tel -Phil Enterprises on next year's event. Sincerely, Donna Theriault Management Analyst c: (Iliam J. Morris, Director of Public Services Lois Thompson, Assistant Manager, Costa Mesa Sanitary District Rick Pickering, Deputy General Manager, Orange County Fair and Exposition Center 77 FAIR DRIVE PHONE (714) 754 -5343 FAX (714) 754-5= TM. (714) 754 -5244