Minutes - Board - 2020-02-11COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT
MINUTES OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS STUDY SESSION
FEBRUARY 11, 2020
Members present
Arlene Schafer, Art Perry, Bob Ooten, Jim Ferryman, Mike Scheafer
Members absent
None.
Staff present
Scott Carroll (General Manager), Kaitlin Tran (Finance Manager), Gina Terraneo
(Management Analyst II & Acting District Clerk), Nabila Guzman (Management Analyst
1), Ed Roberts (Code Enforcement Officer), Angela Colunga (Office Specialist)
Others present
Jim Mosher (District resident), Judith Gielow (Citizens Advisory Committee Member),
Blair Welch (Tripepi Smith)
Meeting called to order at 9:30 A.M.
A. OPENING ITEMS
Procedural: 1. Roll Call - (If absences occur, consider whether to deem those absences
excused based on facts presented for the absence — such determination shall be the
permission required by law.)
President Ferryman called the meeting to order at 9:30 A.M.
Management Analyst II and Acting District Clerk, Gina Terraneo, noted that
President Ferryman, Vice President Ooten, Secretary Schafer, Director Scheafer,
and Director Perry were present at this time.
B. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Procedural: 1. Public Comments
President Ferryman opened public comments. Seeing no one wishing to speak at
this time, he closed public comments.
COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT PAGE 2
MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS STUDY SESSION
HELD FEBRUARY 111 2020
C. ITEMS OF STUDY
Action, Receive and File: 1. January 2020 Code Enforcement Officer Report
Recommendation: That the Board of Directors receive and file this report.
Code Enforcement Officer, Ed Roberts, presented report details. He noted that he
conducted 5 scavenging investigations during the month of January.
Director Perry asked if the scavengers approached on Peppertree Lane were
recurring violators.
Mr. Roberts affirmed that both scavengers were recurring violators. He noted that
issuing administrative citations is not likely to have an impact, since the majority of
scavengers he encounters are indigent and/or homeless.
Director Perry asked if Mr. Roberts notifies homeless individuals about Costa
Mesa's bridge shelter.
Mr. Roberts confirmed that he shares information about all the resources made
available to homeless individuals by the City of Costa Mesa.
Secretary Schafer asked if the recent windy weather impacted trash collection and
the amount of trash carts left in the street.
Mr. Roberts commented that lightweight carts can sometimes blow over,
but shared that there were no notable incidents. He reported that he issued 107
notices for trash carts left in public view, which include several instances on 19th
Street and Placentia Avenue. He commented that residents in this area use their
trash carts to reserve parking spots, and he noted that there is a high rate of
turnover in this neighborhood.
There was no further discussion and the report was received.
General Manager, Scott Carroll, noted that CR&R did not provide their January
billing in time for the regular Organics and Solid Waste Diversion reports to be
included in today's agenda. He added that they will be presented to the Board at
the March Study Session.
Action: 2. Reclassifying The Part -Time Accounting Clerk Position to Full-time Status
Recommendation: That the Board of Directors direct staff to bring this item back to the
February 24, 2020 regular Board of Directors meeting to consider approving reclassifying
the part-time Accounting Clerk position to full-time status.
Finance Manager, Kaitlin Tran, provided report details. She noted that the Finance
department formerly consisted of 3 full-time positions (Finance Manager, Senior
Accountant, and Administrative Assistant II), but now has 2 full-time positions
(Finance Manager and Accountant) and 1 vacant part-time Accounting Clerk
COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT PAGE 3
MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS STUDY SESSION
HELD FEBRUARY 11, 2020
position. She explained that, as a result, the department has struggled to keep up
with accounts receivable, cash receipts, and general support tasks. Ms. Tran noted
that there are sufficient funds available in the Solid Waste and Wastewater Funds
to cover a full-time Accounting Clerk for the remainder of fiscal year 2019-2020 if
the position is filled in May, and an additional $45,500 would be needed to cover
the position's fully burdened cost in fiscal year 2020-2021. She noted that funds
could be transferred from part-time salaries, anti -scavenging, and tuition
reimbursement. Lastly, she requested that the Board direct staff to bring this item
to the February Board Meeting to consider approving reclassifying the part-time
Accounting Clerk to full-time status.
Director Perry asked if the Accounting Clerk position would be a new position.
Mr. Carroll clarified that staff is requesting to change the Accounting Clerk position
from part-time to full-time.
Director Scheafer commented that the Board approved a similar position change
for the Maintenance Assistant position.
Discussion followed regarding the evolution of the Accounting Clerk position and
the growth of the agency.
Director Scheafer inquired about the position's required qualifications. He asked if
the District has any incentives for becoming a Certified Public Accountant (CPA).
Mr. Carroll noted that the District does not require the position to be a CPA;
however, the District encourages its staff to pursue professional development
through its tuition reimbursement program.
Vice President Ooten asked if the current Administrative Assistant supports the
finance department.
Mr. Carroll noted that the current Administrative Assistant supports the
Administrative Services Manager with Human Resources related tasks.
Director Perry recommended increasing the qualifications needed for the
Accounting Clerk position.
Mr. Carroll noted that the position has traditionally been entry level.
Motion: To direct staff to bring this item back to the February 24, 2020 regular
Board of Directors meeting to consider approving reclassifying the part-time
Accounting Clerk position to full-time status.
Motion by Art Perry, second by Arlene Schafer.
Final Resolution: Motion Carries 5-0
Aye: Arlene Schafer, Art Perry, Bob Ooten, Jim Ferryman, Mike Scheafer
COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT PAGE 4
MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS STUDY SESSION
HELD FEBRUARY 111 2020
Fhere was no further discussion.
Action, Receive and File: 3. Update — Communications Support and Strategy RFP
Recommendation: That the Board of Directors discuss this item and direct staff to bring
this item back to the Solid Waste Ad Hoc Committee for a recommendation to the Board.
Management Analyst I, Nabila Guzman, presented report details. She noted that
the District released a request for proposal (RFP) for communications support and
strategy and received 5 proposals. She explained that the top 3 rated proposals
were interviewed by the Solid Waste Ad Hoc Committee, and the Committee
requested that the firms each provide an updated 12-month cost proposal for a
more focused scope of service. Ms. Guzman provided an overview of the updated
scope of services and noted that the staff report contains the updated cost
proposals. She recommended that the Board direct staff to bring the item back to
the Solid Waste Ad Hoc Committee to review the updated cost proposals and then
make a recommendation to the Board.
Director Scheafer commented that he is surprised by the costs listed in the
updated proposals. He noted that the proposal from JPW Communications
increased significantly, while the proposal from CV Strategies remained low.
Ms. Guzman commented that she is satisfied with the proposals, since they reflect
the true cost of the services for a 12-month period. She noted that JPW
Communications' original proposal only reflected the cost of a communications
plan and a $25,000 allotment of funding for the implementation of select services.
She also noted that CV Strategies did not include the costs of travel time and
mileage in their proposal, while JPW Communications did include these costs.
Discussion followed regarding the updated proposal costs.
Director Scheafer discussed the interview process that the Solid Waste Ad Hoc
Committee conducted. He commended all three public relations firms on their
presentations and noted that the Committee selected JPW Communications as
their top choice after the interviews. He added that the updated proposals may
impact the Committee's choice, since the total costs have changed.
Vice President Ooten indicated agreement that all three firms presented well. He
commented that he considered the project managers when evaluating the
presentations. He noted that CV Strategies and JPW Communications included
their project managers in their presentations, while Tripepi Smith's presentation
was led by the firm's President.
Ms. Guzman noted that Tripepi Smith had their project manager present during
their presentation.
Vice President Ooten noted that their project manager did not get a chance to
speak, although the presentation time was limited. He commented that Tripepi
COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT PAGE 5
MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS STUDY SESSION
HELD FEBRUARY 11; 2020
Smith seemed to understand the proposal and the focus of the project better than
the other firms. He added that their cost was the highest at the time of the
interviews but is no longer the highest given the updated proposals. He
commented that he is comfortable with any of the firms, but he requested staffs
input regarding which firm can best meet the District's needs. He noted that CV
Strategies did not provide a description to explain their updated costs.
Director Perry suggested inviting the Solid Waste Ad Hoc Committee to discuss
the three firms at the next Study Session.
Director Scheafer commented that he was initially reluctant to pursue hiring a
public relations firm, but he is now more inclined to support the selection of a public
relations firm. He noted that he is concerned about a potential consolidation effort.
Mr. Carroll reiterated the staff recommendation and noted that today's discussion
was intended for the Solid Waste Ad Hoc Committee Members to share their input
about the interviews with the rest of the Board.
President Ferryman commented that if these firms are all able to provide the same
services at the same level of quality, the District should pursue the firm with the
lowest cost.
Mr. Carroll noted that the Board can also direct staff to proceed with drafting a
contract with one of the firms if they are ready to do so.
Secretary Schafer expressed interest in getting a recommendation from the Solid
Waste Ad Hoc Committee and requested additional explanation of the interview
process.
Director Scheafer explained that the scope of work includes enhancements to the
District's public outreach efforts. He noted that the majority of the public is not
aware of what the District does, and that staff may not be capable of conducting
the level of public outreach that is needed. He reiterated that he would be
comfortable hiring any of the three firms based on their demonstrated abilities.
President Ferryman asked how this firm would interact with the District's existing
public relations consultant.
Director Scheafer explained that the current consultant, Faubel Public Affairs,
would work with the new firm.
Mr. Carroll explained that Faubel Public Affairs has different objectives and a
different scope of work.
President Ferryman commented that there may be some overlap between the two
firms.
COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT PAGE 6
MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS STUDY SESSION
HELD FEBRUARY 111 2020
Discussion followed regarding next steps.
Ms. Guzman suggested that the Solid Waste Ad Hoc Committee meet again to
determine which firm they will recommend to the Board, and then the
recommendation will be brought to the Board with a proposed contract.
Vice President Ooten indicated agreement that the Solid Waste Ad Hoc Committee
should meet again. He commented that it is important to ensure that the selected
firm understands the scope of services, and he requested to hear more input from
staff at the Committee meeting.
District resident, Jim Mosher, commented that the change in proposal costs is odd
and has changed the ranking of the firms dramatically. He indicated concern
regarding the discussion of the firms and the motivations behind the outreach
efforts. He noted that he was under the impression that the firm would focus on
meeting state mandated recycling goals rather than District branding and
prevention of consolidation efforts. Mr. Mosher pointed out that the Financial
Review portion of the staff report states that the costs would be equally divided
between the Solid Waste Fund and the Wastewater Fund. He commented that as
a wastewater -only customer, he does not believe this is a fair apportionment given
the scope of service's focus on solid waste programs.
Director Perry indicated agreement with the notion that the selected firm should
assist with increasing waste diversion efforts.
Director Scheafer noted that all three firms presented ideas about how to increase
waste diversion efforts. He added that consolidation prevention will not be a main
objective for the selected firm, but that increasing public awareness may help
prevent these efforts.
Vice President Ooten commented that the Solid Waste Ad Hoc Committee should
review the scope of services.
Ms. Guzman noted that the scope of services was revised to make it more concise
and focused. She explained each of the scope of services' awareness campaigns:
mixed waste carts, Organics Recycling Program, Sewer Inspection Rebate
Program, and special solid waste programs.
Vice President Ooten indicated support for the proposed campaigns, but he
commented that the initial focus was to increase waste diversion.
Director Perry suggested that the Solid Waste Ad Hoc Committee remain in place
after making a recommendation for the public relations firm in order to come up
with ideas to help the District increase its waste diversion efforts.
The Board of Directors directed staff to bring this item back to the Solid Waste Ad
Hoc Committee to discuss the revised proposals, funding apportionment, and
COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT PAGE 7
MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS STUDY SESSION
HELD FEBRUARY 111 2020
District staffs recommendation. The Board then asked that the Committee make
a recommendation to the Board of Directors for consideration.
There was no further discussion.
Action, Receive and File: 4. Refund of Wastewater and Solid Waste Assessment —
APN 422-102-09 Bernard Street
Recommendation: That the Board of Directors provide direction to staff on a refund for
APN 422-102-09.
Ms. Guzman provided report details. She stated that the District resident is
requesting a refund for overcharges on their wastewater and solid waste
assessment fee but has not specified the amount of years for the refund. She noted
that the homeowner's single-family home located within the District was
misclassified as a multi -family home by the City of Costa Mesa. Ms. Guzman
added that the District only has records on the property for the last 15 years.
The Board discussed the previous reimbursement given to a District resident for
overcharges on their wastewater and solid waste assessment fee.
Mr. Carroll noted that the previous reimbursement was granted due to the District
being at fault and incorrectly classifying the resident's property as a multi -family
property. He clarified that the property of the current case was misclassified by the
City of Costa Mesa.
Ms. Guzman stated that the District bases its charges on property records
collected by the City of Costa Mesa since the City used to be responsible for
sanitation. She noted that when the homeowner inquired about a refund, she
contacted the City's Planning Department which still has the property listed as a
multi -family property.
Director Perry requested a legal review from District Counsel.
Mr. Carroll noted that District staff will consult with District Counsel. He stated that
the justification for the previous case is not the same for the current case. He added
that the District can legally issue a refund for the last six months according to State
law.
Director Scheafer requested District staff to draft a resolution or policy on this topic.
He commented that there is some personal responsibility placed on the
homeowner for checking their property tax bill. He recommended consulting
District Counsel and drafting a policy that matches State laws.
Vice President Ooten inquired if staff has conducted a study to find out how many
other District properties are misclassified.
COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT PAGE 8
MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS STUDY SESSION
HELD FEBRUARY 111 2020
Ms. Guzman stated that for the past three years District staff and CR&R have been
working on reconciliation of District properties that receive trash and sewer
services. She noted that staff is currently in the process of verifying all properties
located within the District's service area. She acknowledged that it is rare to find a
misclassified property. She added that the District has found a few properties with
District trash carts, but no account set up for service.
President Ferryman discussed past property classification efforts by the District.
Director Perry commented that about 15 years ago the District received about five
to ten refund requests at every Board meeting. He stated that the District's current
property records are very accurate.
Mr. Mosher discussed a homeowner's responsibility for checking their property tax
bill for sanitation charges. He noted that most homeowners are presumably not
aware of whether their sanitation charge is correct or incorrect. He referenced the
District's Operations Code's policy regarding refunds and noted that if the District
grants a refund that it is not legally required to issue, then it can be considered a
gift of public funds. He suggested that the legal analysis should also address the
reverse of this issue. He recommended that the District drafts a policy stating the
legal requirements for collecting payments from a property that has been
misclassified as a single-family property but is a multi -family property.
Discussion followed regarding next steps.
Director Perry recommended that staff review the District's refund policy and
update if needed.
The Board of Directors directed staff to bring this item back to the Board and
present a six-month refund for the wastewater overcharges and a one-year refund
for solid waste overcharges.
Director Scheafer noted that if the District resident would like a larger refund, then
she should approach the City of Costa Mesa.
There was no further discussion.
Action: 5. Quarterly Legislative Update — Quarter 1
Recommendation: That the Board of Directors receive and file this Quarterly Legislative
Update.
Ms. Terraneo provided report details. She discussed AB 1672, which would enact
requirements for wipes to be clearly labeled to show that they are not flushable
and to prohibit companies from making false representations about their flushing
ability. She noted that most flushable wipes do not break down in water and cause
dangerous obstructions in wastewater systems. She commented that staff, the
California Special Districts Association, and the California Association of
COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT PAGE 9
MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS STUDY SESSION
HELD FEBRUARY 11, 2020
Sanitation Agencies recommend supporting AB 1672. She discussed AB 161,
which prohibits stores from printing receipts unless a customer requests a copy.
She discussed AB 291, which establishes a local emergency preparedness and
hazard mitigation fund for local governments. She discussed AB 992, which seeks
to clarify the Brown Act regarding the use of social media by Board members. She
stated that it would specifically allow members of legislative bodies to safely
participate in social media discussions with constituents if the majority of members
do not respond directly or discuss agency business. She discussed AB 15097
which seeks to place greater responsibility on manufactures of lithium -ion
batteries.
Director Perry inquired about AB 1509.
Ms. Terraneo stated that the bill would require manufactures to provide a list to Cal
Recycle of all lithium -ion batteries that they produce so that Cal Recycle can
ensure that the batteries are being properly disposed.
Director Perry asked if the Orange Coast College (OCC) Recycling Center collects
lithium -ion batteries.
Ms. Terraneo noted that the OCC Recycling Center accepts household batteries
but no lithium -ion batteries. She discussed AB 1567, which sets a requirement for
all relevant agencies to be involved in the coordination of State goals related to
organic waste diversion, climate change, and air quality. She noted that the goal
is to receive input from all agencies in order to reduce the chance of conflicting
regulations. She discussed AB 1840, which requires Cal Recycle to create a plan
to increase beverage container recycling efforts and to ensure that people have
access to recycling centers.
Director Scheafer inquired if there is any discussion regarding beverage container
recycling centers closing. He asked if the State is trying to create more centers or
increase awareness of current centers.
Ms. Terraneo stated that the bill is focused on creating more beverage container
recycling centers.
Director Scheafer noted that AB 1840 does not delineate whether these new
centers will be public or privately operated.
Ms. Terraneo discussed SB 424, which seeks to reduce the amount of waste
produced from cigarette butts and single -use electronic cigarettes.
Director Scheafer inquired about SB 424 and discussed the current efforts to clean
up cigarette butts by the Surfrider Foundation. He noted that the bill aims at
prohibiting people from buying cigarettes and cigars.
COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT PAGE 10
MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS STUDY SESSION
HELD FEBRUARY 11, 2020
Ms. Terraneo discussed SB 667, which requires Cal Recycle to conduct a needs
assessment to determine how the State's organic waste goal of 75% diversion is
going to be achieved and includes reviewing technological and infrastructure
needs on a local and state level.
Director Perry asked if there are stores in Costa Mesa that accept lithium -ion
batteries.
Mr. Carroll stated that Home Depot collects lithium -ion batteries.
Director Perry recommended researching the stores that accept such batteries and
including them in an article for the next newsletter.
Vice President Ooten discussed the bills that focus on organic recycling and the
State's goal of 75% diversion. He commented that most municipalities are
struggling to reach the state's diversion goal. He expressed his support for the 75%
diversion goal but noted that the State does not seem to know how it will reach
that goal.
Director Perry inquired when the State will begin fining municipalities.
Ms. Guzman stated that SB 1383 does not go into effect until 2022 and that Cal
Recycle has not yet adopted the final regulations for SB 1383. She noted that there
will be a delay in the fining process.
Vice President Ooten asked if the District's diversion rate will decrease due to
green waste no longer being accepted as Alternative Daily Cover (ADC).
Ms. Guzman stated that green waste is still considered recycling according to
CR&R. She shared that the County's landfills have land set aside for composting.
She noted that if CR&R cannot take the green waste to their facilities, then they
can take it to the County's landfills at an additional cost.
Director Perry asked about the percentage of green waste that is considered ADC.
He also asked who the District is currently working with at CR&R.
Ms. Guzman stated that about 3,000 tons of green waste is currently being counted
as recycling credit but could potentially be counted as landfill waste by the State's
new regulations, and thus reduce the District's diversion rate. She noted that the
District is working with Sustainability Supervisor, Kristy Morehead.
There was no further discussion.
Action: 6. Robin B. Harriers & Associates, Inc. Update
Recommendation: That the Board of Directors receive and file this report.
COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT PAGE 11
MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS STUDY SESSION
HELD FEBRUARY 111 2020
Mr. Carroll provided report details. He mentioned that Michael Benesh of Robin B.
Hamers and Associates will be presenting his report on the District's Sewer Master
Plan to the Board of Directors at the next Study Session meeting scheduled for
March 10, 2020.
Vice President Ooten inquired if Environmental Engineering Consulting (EEC) has
performed the hydraulic analysis for the Sewer System Master Plan.
Mr. Carroll shared that EEC has completed their analysis.
President Ferryman discussed the memorial ceremony for Rob Hamers scheduled
for May 2020.
There was no further discussion.
D. CLOSING ITEMS
Procedural: 1. Oral Communications and Director Comments
Vice President Ooten recommended addressing Mr. Mosher's comment about
having a District policy for under -charging District residents.
Director Schafer shared the Independent Special Districts of Orange County's
Form 700 workshop with the Board of Directors.
There was no further discussion.
Procedural: 2. Adjournment
President Ferryman adjourned the meeting at 10:48 A.M.
q5ev�
JJes Ferryman
Pr ident