Minutes - CAC - 2018-06-06 SANIN,
Iwo
PoRATE_
COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT
MINUTES OF CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE SPECIAL MEETING
JUNE 6,2018
Members present
Albert Graham, Jr., Andrew Nielson, Elodie Katz, Jana Oak, Mike Carey, Mike Mcllroy,
Monte Fields, Phil Marsh, Shayne Smith, Tom Brenneman
Members absent
Sue Lester
Board of Directors present
Arlene Schafer, Art Perry, Bob Ooten, Jim Ferryman, Mike Scheafer
Staff present
Scott Carroll (General Manager), Alan Burns (District Counsel), Noelani
Middenway (District Clerk), Gina Terraneo (Management Analyst II)
Others present
Deborah Diep (Cal State Fullerton Center for Demographic Research), Jim
Mosher (resident)
Meeting called to order at 6:02 P.M.
A. Opening Items
1. Call to Order
Chairman Carey called the meeting to order at 6:02 P.M.
2. Roll Call - (If absences occur, consider whether to deem those absences excused
based on facts presented for the absence —such determination shall be the permission
required by law.)
District Clerk, Noelani Middenway, conducted roll call and noted that Albert
Graham, Jr., Andrew Nielson, Mike Carey, Mike Mcllroy, Phil Marsh, Shayne
Smith, and Tom Brenneman were present.
B. Public Comments
1. Public Comments - This time has been set aside for persons in the audience to make
comments on items within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Costa Mesa Sanitary
COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT PAGE 2
MINUTES OF THE CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE SPECIAL MEETING
HELD JUNE 6, 2018
District that are not listed on this agenda. Members of the public will have the
opportunity to address the Board of Directors and Citizens Advisory Committee about all
other items on this agenda at the time those items are considered. Under the provisions
of the Brown Act, the Board of Directors and Citizens Advisory Committee are
prohibited from taking action on oral requests but may refer the matter to staff or to a
subsequent meeting. The Board of Directors will respond after public comment has
been received. Please state your name. Each speaker will be limited to four (4)
continuous minutes.
Chairman Carey opened public comments. Seeing no one wishing to speak, he
closed public comments.
C. Public Hearing
Procedural: 1. Open Public Hearing
Chairman Carey opened the public hearing. He invited General Manager, Scott
Carroll, to provide an update to the Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC).
Mr. Carroll addressed comments and suggestions made by CAC Members. First,
he noted that the City of Costa Mesa's and Mesa Water District's voting district
maps were added to the District's FAQ webpage in response to CAC Member,
Sue Lester's suggestion. Then, Mr. Carroll noted that a map of the District's
pump stations was added to the District's website in response to CAC Member,
Tom Brenneman's suggestion. Lastly, he explained the purpose of the District's
pump stations.
Ms. Middenway noted that she did not call for CAC Member, Elodie Katz, during
the roll call and she verified that Ms. Katz was present.
Presentation: 2. Receive a Presentation from Demographer, Deborah Diep, Director
of Center for Demographic Research, on the Voting Rights Act and the District's
Existing Conditions, Receive Input Regarding Potential Transition to By-District
Elections, and Release of Public Participation Kit
Deborah Diep of the Cal State Fullerton Center for Demographic Research
provided a recap of the presentation given during the first Public Hearing
regarding the District's existing conditions, utilizing the 2010 Federal Decennial
Census and Citizens Voting Age Population (CVAP) data. She explained the
difference between census blocks, census block groups, partial block groups,
and census tracts.
CAC Member, Jana Oak, entered the meeting at 6:07 P.M.
Ms. Diep noted that the 1,269 census blocks in the District's service area were
consolidated into 80 census block groups in order to make the redistricting
process more manageable. She shared maps depicting the difference between
the Costa Mesa Sanitary District and Mesa Water District service areas. Ms. Diep
COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT PAGE 3
MINUTES OF THE CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE SPECIAL MEETING
HELD JUNE 6,2018
reiterated the goal of achieving a nearly equal target population within each
voting district and provided an overview of the recommended redistricting criteria.
She presented the District's demographic data, including service area maps
depicting concentrations of racial and ethnic groups. Additionally, Ms.
Diep shared a map depicting concentrations of owner-occupied households
within the District's service area. Lastly, she provided an overview of the District's
Public Participation Kit and explained how the public can provide input regarding
proposed voting districts. She reiterated that the deadline for submitting input is
Friday, June 8, 2018.
CAC Member, Monte Fields, entered the meeting at 6:23 P.M.
Ms. Diep provided an overview of the districting schedule, including upcoming
public hearing dates.
Procedural: 3. Receive Comments
Following her presentation, Ms. Diep invited questions and comments.
CAC Member, Andrew Nielson, asked for clarification regarding the target
population within each voting district.
Ms. Diep explained that it is required by law that each voting district is nearly
equal in population. She added that there may be slight variation in population
size, but the District should be able to provide reasonable explanations for any
deviation.
CAC Member, Elodie Katz, asked if there has been any litigation against
agencies regarding the process used to create voting districts.
Ms. Diep noted that she is not aware of any such litigation. She reiterated the
recommendation to make each voting district as close to the target population as
possible and noted that any deviation that is near or above 10% should have a
reasonable explanation.
Mr. Nielson asked that Ms. Diep further explain the concept of minority majority
districts.
Ms. Diep explained that creating a voting district with a protected class majority is
a way of addressing voter dilution.
District Counsel, Alan Burns, noted that within the context of the District's
anticipated litigation, the District would be analyzed based on its transition from
at-large to by-district voting, as well as the creation of voting districts with near-
equal populations.
Mr. Nielson verified that only 1 proposed voting district map has been submitted
to the District by the public.
COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT PAGE 4
MINUTES OF THE CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE SPECIAL MEETING
HELD JUNE 6,2018
CAC Member, Jana Oak, inquired about the possibility of splitting an area with a
protected class majority in an effort to create multiple minority majority districts
rather than a single minority majority district.
Ms. Diep noted that this is a possibility, but added that splitting the area may be
considered voter dilution if the protected class' population is not large enough to
constitute a majority of multiple districts.
Discussion followed regarding the use of CVAP data as supplemental information
in order to create a minority majority voting district.
Chairman Carey asked if the District is looking to receive an ideal or minimum
number of proposals from the public for the districting process.
Ms. Diep noted that there is no ideal or minimum number of proposals required.
Mr. Burns reminded the CAC that they are subject to the Brown Act and noted
that any collaborative efforts to provide input on the districting process must be
done during public meetings. However, he noted that individuals may submit
individual proposals.
Ms. Katz asked what would occur if nobody within a voting district ran for a Board
of Directors seat.
Mr. Burns responded that there is an appointment process for that situation.
There were no further questions, comments, or discussion from the CAC and the
presentation was received.
Procedural: 4. Close the Public Hearing
Chairman Carey closed the public hearing.
D. Closing Items
Procedural: 1. Oral Communications & Director Comments
Mr. Nielson asked if any CAC Members intended to submit proposals and asked
if a CAC member would have the opportunity to present their proposal at a future
public hearing.
Chairman Carey noted that CAC Member proposals would be treated the same
as public proposals.
Chairman Carey opened public comments.
Jim Mosher, a resident, provided comments. He noted that he was unable to find
a law that specifies the number of Board Members that the District can have and
COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT PAGE 5
MINUTES OF THE CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE SPECIAL MEETING
HELD JUNE 6,2018
commented that this information may be useful. Mr. Mosher commented that he
is unsure of whether or not redistricting would be a positive change for the
District and questioned whether there may be other options available to the
District. He shared that he reviewed some of the supplemental information on the
District's FAQ webpage, including the concept of cumulative voting. Additionally,
Mr. Mosher commented that it may be useful to know how much trash and sewer
revenue comes from each area within the District, as well as the number of
registered voters. He commented that he struggled with creating logical voting
districts and suggested that the District simplify the public input process by
allowing the public to use a computer program to generate voting district maps.
Lastly, Mr. Mosher asked what the consequences would be if the District did not
finalize its redistricting process by August 6th.
Seeing no one else from the public wishing to speak, Chairman Carey closed
public comments.
Mr. Burns responded to Mr. Mosher. He commented that the District is
encouraging the CAC to maintain a 5 seat Board of Directors and noted that it is
theoretically possible to utilize cumulative voting. However, he added that the
Orange County Registrar of Voters advised that they would not process
cumulative voting. Lastly, Mr. Burns commented that some agencies have made
the argument that they are making good faith efforts, but noted that this
strategy is usually met with litigation. He noted that this does not mean that the
District cannot make a good faith argument, but he commented that this has not
yet proven to be successful.
There were no further comments.
Procedural: 2. Adjourn
Chairman Carey adjourned the meeting at 6:52 P.M.
r4 4
Mike Carey
Citizens Advisory Committ-e Chair