2017_06_13_studyTuesday, June 13, 2017
Board of Directors Study Session
290 Paularino Avenue, Costa Mesa
9:30AM
A. OPENING ITEMS
Subject 1. Call to Order
Meeting Jun 13, 2017 Board of Directors Study Session
Access Public
Type Procedural
A. OPENING ITEMS
(If absences occur, consider whether to deem those absences excused based on facts presented for the absence – such
determination shall be the permission required by law.)
Subject 2. Roll Call
Meeting Jun 13, 2017 Board of Directors Study Session
Access Public
Type Procedural
A. OPENING ITEMS
This time has been set aside for persons in the audience to make comments on items within the subject matter
jurisdiction of the Costa Mesa Sanitary District that are not listed on this agenda. Members of the public will have the
opportunity to address the Board of Directors about all other items on this agenda at the time those items are considered.
Under the provisions of the Brown Act, the Board of Directors is prohibited from taking action on oral requests but may
refer the matter to staff or to a subsequent meeting. The Board of Directors will respond after public comment has been
received. Please state your name. Each speaker will be limited to four (4) continuous minutes.
Subject 3. Public Comments
Meeting Jun 13, 2017 Board of Directors Study Session
Access Public
Type Procedural
B. ITEMS OF STUDY
Summary
A total of 845.73 tons of organic waste were collected and recycled in May 2017.
Staff Recommendation
That the Board of Directors receive and file the report.
Analysis
Below is a graph depicting the total tonnage of organic waste collected during each month of FY 201516 and FY 2016
17.
Legal Review
Not applicable.
Environmental Review
Consideration of the Organics Tonnage Report is an administrative matter and not a disturbance of the environment
similar to grading or construction and not a project under CEQA or the District’s CEQA Guidelines.
Financial Review
Subject 1. Organics Tonnage Report
Meeting Jun 13, 2017 Board of Directors Study Session
Access Public
Type Receive and File
Financial Review
Not applicable.
Public Notice Process
Copies of this report are on file and will be included with the complete agenda packet for the June 13, 2017 Board of
Directors Study Session meeting at District Headquarters and posted on the District’s website.
B. ITEMS OF STUDY
File Attachments
May 2017 CEO report.doc (1,918 KB)
Subject 2. May 2017 Code Enforcement Officer report
Meeting Jun 13, 2017 Board of Directors Study Session
Access Public
Type
B. ITEMS OF STUDY
Summary
On September 16, 2011 CMSD received a seismic study on its wastewater pump stations to determine their vulnerability
in the event of a major earthquake. The Board of Directors directed staff to bring this item back for discussion at an
upcoming Board study session meeting. This item was first discussed by the Board on November 30, 2011 and again on
May 13, 2014.
Analysis
In 2011, a seismic study was performed on CMSD's wastewater pump stations to identify the stations vulnerabilities in
the event of a 6.0 magnitude or greater earthquake occurring within CMSD service area. The study identified
five priorities, which are described below.
Priority I secure the above ground electrical enclosures;
Priority II provide backup power;
Priority III provide flexibility to withstand earth movement;
Priority IV provide additional support for pumping stations in liquefaction zones; and
Priority V secure together concrete grade rings in pumping station manhole openings.
Priority I is complete. Approximately 13 out of the twenty pump stations have rust free stainless steel electrical
enclosures. All twenty pump stations are anchored down to prevent falling over during an earthquake.
Priority II is complete. All twenty pump stations have dedicated back up power. Eight stations have onsite back up
power while eleven stations have dedicated mobile generators or bypass pumps. The 21st Street Pump Station does not
need backup power because this station flows into Elden Pump Station.
Priority III is not complete because it is cost prohibitive. District Engineer Rob Hamers estimates it will cost approximately
$576,390 to provide flexibility at all 20 pump stations. However, when work on individual stations occurs and when the
opportunity presents itself, some of the flexibility provisions are added to the stations. These consist of adding flexible
liners to the incoming gravity lines to the stations plus expanding the diameter of the wall penetrations where pipes enter
and exit the wet wells and valve vaults.
Priorities IV and V are not complete but staff is looking further into these priorities to determine if they are cost prohibitive
or not.
Legal Review
Not applicable
Environmental Review
The addition of earthquake preventative measures at the pump stations is considered minor alterations and is
categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et.
seq.) under Section 15301 as a “Class 1” project as stated under 15301; “Class 1 consists of the operation, repair,
maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures,
facilities …”; pertaining to 15301(b) “Existing facilities of both investor and publiclyowned utilities used to
provide electric power, natural gas, sewerage, or other public utility services”.
Financial Review
To date, CMSD spent a total of $2,179,995 to complete Priorities I and II. The cost breakdown is as follows:
Project #193 Seismic Refurbish $ 89,440
Project #196 Pump Station Emergency Equipment 1,673,132
Project #315 19th St Pump Station Generator 152,327
Subject 3. Pump Station Seismic Study
Meeting Jun 13, 2017 Board of Directors Study Session
Access Public
Type Discussion
Goals 1.0 Sewer Infrastructure
1.7 Pump Station Maintenance & Standardization Program
5.0 Administrative Management
5.5 Refine emergency operations procedures and upgrade infrastructure
Project #316 Adams Pump Station Electrical Improvement for Portable Generator 27,327
Purchased Seven Portable Generators 237,769
$2,179,995
Public Notice Process
Copies of this report are on file and will be included with the complete agenda packet for the June 13, 2017 Board of
Directors Study Session meeting at District Headquarters and posted on the District’s website.
Alternative Actions
Direct staff to complete Priorities III, IV and V.
File Attachments
Pump Station Seismic Study.pdf (18,952 KB)
B. ITEMS OF STUDY
Summary
In 2012, the Costa Mesa Sanitary District (CMSD) entered into an agreement with the Discovery Science Center (DSC) for
program delivery of Eco Challenge, an interactive educational program. In 2015, the contract was renewed to make the
program available to four hundred thirtythree (433) 6th grade students in Costa Mesa as well as amending the program
to include CMSD's Organics Recycling Program. In order to continue the program it is necessary to renew the agreement
with DSC.
Staff Recommendation
Authorize the General Manager to enter into a new agreement with the Discovery Science Center for one (1) year with an
option to extend for an additional year.
Analysis
In 2012, the District entered into an agreement with the Discovery Science Center to educate CMSD residents and youth
about the importance of waste reduction and practical actions for achieving the goals of diverting 75% of waste from our
landfills. The Eco Challenge is an interactive exhibit that combines CMSD's mission to protecting our community's health
and the environment with Discovery Science Foundation's ability to merge learning with fun.
DSC in partnership with OC Waste & Recycling developed this comprehensive, interactive education program that focuses
on the message of "Reduce, Reuse, & Recycle." The purpose of this program is to teach children the importance of
identifying and properly disposing of Household Hazardous Waste and how to become an ecofriendly shopper.
Additionally, with the renewal of the agreement in 2015, CMSD staff began collaborating with DSC to amend their Eco
Challenge Program to reflect CMSD's Organics Recycling Program. When DSC visits local schools they now focus on
organics recycling including food scraps. The goal is for youth to influence their family members to separate and recycle
food waste, which benefits landfills and the environment.
The Eco Challenge Program is targeted to three specific audiences, 6th grade students, teachers and the general public.
The first element of this program includes a 50 minute inclassroom assembly and a take home assignment that requires
students to survey their parents about home recycling practices. The second element includes a 2hour field trip to the
Discovery Cube, located in Santa Ana with the same students who were exposed to the inclass assembly; this allows
students to interact with the Eco Challenge exhibit. The third element is a 2hour teachers’ professional development
program, designed to increase the understanding and delivery of the County’s recycling message to students, through the
inclusion of relevant activities throughout the teachers’ curriculum.
The Eco Challenge Education Program also includes the following:
1. Interactive inclass instruction featuring a student keypad response system, adapted to place a greater emphasis
on the identification of organics waste
2. A student booklet summarizing key concepts, also including exercises designed to assist in the identification of
organics suitable for recycling
3. Incentive for visiting a Household Hazardous Waste Collection Center
4. Take home survey, adapted to provide information about new organics recycling process
5. Classroom resources used to accompany the inclass instruction
6. Field trip to DSC which includes a 20 minute demonstration focused on organics recycling
Costs for program delivery is a per student basis at a rate of $22.62 with an annual contract amount of $12,000 which
includes transportation costs to the Discovery Cube. Of the total contract amount $4,157 of the funds are used to
purchase materials that are required for the program such as students' kits, educational booklet, and household
hazardous waste collection bins. Over the last 5 years CMSD has contributed $55,908.75 to DSC and a total of 1,964
Costa Mesa students have participated in the program.
Subject 4. Eco Challenge Program Update
Meeting Jun 13, 2017 Board of Directors Study Session
Access Public
Type Action (Consent)
Preferred Date Jun 13, 2017
Absolute Date Jun 13, 2017
Recommended
Action
Authorize the General Manager to enter into a new agreement with the Discovery Science Center
for one (1) year with an option to extend for an additional year.
Since the 2015 agreement, DSC has not reached the desired 433 students per fiscal year as stated in the contract. This
is due in part to what schools are able to participate in the program during the school year. Unfortunately, classroom
time can be limited which is contributing the lower than budgeted head count. But it is important to note that DSC does
not charge CMSD for students they are not able to reach. Currently, assemblies and field trips are focused in the
beginning and end of the school year which contributes to the time constraint that has been experienced. In this new
contract it is recommended CMSD specifies that assemblies and field trips are to be held year round to allow more
students to participate in the program.
*FY 1617 data only includes information from June 2016 to March 2017. Presentations and field trips are focused in the
beginning and end of the school year. Actual numbers may be higher.
Breakdown of Student participation by School:
Adams Elementary 310 Students
College Park Elementary 90 Students
Paularino Elementary 204 Students
St. John the Baptist 63 Students
Whittier Elementary 523 Students
Kaiser Elementary 706 Students
Kline School 17 Students
Pomona Elementary 51 Students
At the end of the program, teachers are given program evaluations and the results have been positive. Teachers have
expressed an overwhelming appreciation for the combination of the assembly and field trip for this program. They believe
it increases students' comprehension and stresses the importance of the information provided with this program. DSC
considers our program a success. As a result, staffs recommendation is to continue to support the Eco Challenge Program
for FY 20172018 and FY 20182019. It is recommended that the contract amount of $12,000 to reach 433 students
remain the same but language of assemblies and field trips being conducted yearround is added to try and reach our
student goal. The best benefit to this program is that over time, investing in our youth will yield changes in behavior that
will improve the environment and extend the future life of landfills in Orange County.
Legal Review
Not applicable.
Environmental Review
The Eco Challenge Program is not a disturbance of the environment similar to grading or construction and does not
constitute a project under CEQA or the District’s CEQA Guidelines.
Financial Review
There is $50,500 budgeted for Educational programs in the fiscal years 201718.
Public Notice Process
Copies of this report are on file and will be included with the complete agenda packet for the June 13, 2017 Study Session
meeting at District Headquarters and posted on the District’s website
Alternative Actions
Do not approve the renewal of a contract with Discovery Science Center and discontinue the program.
B. ITEMS OF STUDY
Summary
Over the course of the last several years, the Board of Directors has requested staff to focus on paying down the District’s
unfunded pension liabilities. Based on this direction, last June the District made a payment of $125,000 to California
Employers’ Retiree Benefit Trust Fund (CERBT) paying off the District's Unfunded Other PostEmployment Benefits
(OPEB). This year staff recommended that the Board approve a payment or payoff of the District's Public Agency Cost
sharing MultipleEmployer Defined Benefit Pension Plan administered by the California Public Employees' Retirement
System (CalPERS). Staff is requesting direction on the amount of they would like to pay down which would be brought
back to the June 22, 2017 for approval.
Recommendation
The Board of Directors request staff to bring back this item to the June 22, 2017 Board meeting for approval and
appropriation of $335,647 using available funds in the Asset Replacement Fund.
Analysis
The District's enrolls it's employees in CalPERS, who provides; defined benefit service retirements, disability benefits, COLA
adjustments and death benefits to our employees and their beneficiaries through a costsharing pool made up of
other public agencies. Each payroll, the District makes a payment to CalPERS based on percentage of actual payroll. In
addition, each month the District makes a payment of $1,100 towards reducing the District's unfunded pension liability.
The District's unfunded pension liability is complex actuarial calculation factoring in assumptions on our retirees, current
and past employees, as well as other pool participant's personnel, investment returns and many other factors. All of this
data and assumptions are used to calculate the value District's pension liability as of a moment in time. For example, as
of June 30, 2017 the District's total pension valuation is an unfunded amount of $335,647. So, if the District paid
CalPERS $335,647 right now and continued to pay the required amount of each payroll would we never have an
unfunded pension liability again, maybe. It would depend how good CalPERS' assumptions and investment strategies are.
If the entire amount of $335,647 was paid by June 30, 2017, we would have a "Fresh Start" according to CalPERS.
However, even with the fresh start, at some point in the future the District may have a small unfunded liability or even
be over funded! So what is the benefit of paying off or paying down the unfunded pension now? Compounding interest!
Like a home mortgage, when the payments are spread out over a longer period of time, interest is charged
and compounds the amount owed. The chart below shows our three different retirement plans as well as the amount we
owe now and how much we would pay if it was spread over the current amortization schedule of 30 years or
requested an alternate schedule of 20 or 15 years (CalPERS amortization schedules are attached).
Plan June 30, 2017 30 Years 20 Years 15 Years
Miscellaneous Plan $320,417 $710,245 $650,082 $546,297
Miscellaneous 2nd Tier Plan $ 11,968 $ 33,170 $ 28,840 $ 24,282
Miscellaneous PEPRA $ 3,262 $ 3,904 $ 0 $ 0
$335,647 $747,319 $678,922 $570,579
Legal Review
Not applicable.
Environmental Review
Subject activity is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources
Code Section 21000 et. seq.). Section 15300.4 of CEQA allows an agency while establishing its own procedures “to list
those specific activities which fall within each of the exempt classes”, and the District has adopted “CEQA Guidelines and
Implementing Procedures” that state on page 6 “”Projects” does not include …. C. Continuing administrative or
maintenance activities.”
Financial Review
Subject 5. Unfunded Pension Liability Payment
Meeting Jun 13, 2017 Board of Directors Study Session
Access Public
Type Discussion
Goals 7.0 Finance
7.5 Evaluate an appropriate reserve program for District funds and develop an inclusive
reserve policy
Staff recommends pay down the entire amount now using available funds in the Asset Replacement Fund. Attached is
the Asset Replacement Fund schedule showing there is over $400,000 available.
Public Notice Process
Copies of this report are on file and will be included with the entire agenda packet for the June 12, 2017 Board of
Directors study session meeting at District Headquarters and on District website www.cmsdca.gov
Alternative Actions
1. Refer the matter back to staff for additional information.
2. Request staff to bring item back to June 22, 2017 Board meeting.
File Attachments
1. miscellaneous2015.pdf (35 KB)
2. secondtier2015.pdf (35 KB)
3. pepra2015.pdf (34 KB)
4. Asset Replacement Fund FY201617.pdf (23 KB)
B. ITEMS OF STUDY
Summary
During the budget process there was discussion on the purpose and criteria of the Earthquake Reserve in the Wastewater
Fund and the Asset Management Fund minimum balance. Staff has researched the history of the reserves and did not
find any formal policies documented. Staff is wishes to discuss these items to clarify and formalize the Board's policy
in writing to be consistent with Operating Reserves Policy in the Operations Code (See attached).
Recommendation
The Board of Director ask staff to bring back a written policy on reserves for Board approval based on the discussion at the
study session.
Analysis
Earthquake Reserve: The District has had a $1,000,000 Earthquake Reserve in the Wastewater Fund since prior to
separating services from the City in July 2004. The purpose of the reserve was probably to set aside funds for
infrastructure repairs if there was a major earthquake.
Asset Management Fund Reserve: The Asset Management Fund (AMF) was established in the Fiscal Year 20112012
Budget (See Attached). After the 20102011 asset management study was completed, the Board of Directors wanted an
increased commitment to Capital Improvement Projects with a goal of $5 million in reserves set aside in a separate
fund. In November 2012, the General Manager prepared a staff report clarifying how the AMF should be used (See
attached CIP Asset Management Report Nov 2012).
Staff would like the Board to consider moving the Earthquake Reserve to the AMF and outline the minimum balance
required in the AMF.
Legal Review
Not applicable.
Environmental Review
Subject activity is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources
Code Section 21000 et. seq.). Section 15300.4 of CEQA allows an agency while establishing its own procedures “to list
those specific activities which fall within each of the exempt classes”, and the District has adopted “CEQA Guidelines and
Implementing Procedures” that state on page 6 “”Projects” does not include …. C. Continuing administrative or
maintenance activities.”
Financial Review
There is no additional financial impact for formalizing the reserve policies.
Public Notice Process
Copies of this report are on file and will be included with the entire agenda packet for the June 13, 2017 Board of
Directors regular meeting at District Headquarters and on District website www.cmsdca.gov
Alternative Actions
1. Refer the matter back to staff for additional information.
File Attachments
OPERATIONS CODE_FINAL_20170505.pdf (54 KB)
201112 Budget Establishs Asset Mgt Fund.pdf (662 KB)
CIP Asset Management Report Nov 2012.pdf (1,496 KB)
Subject 6. Earthquake and Asset Management Reserves
Meeting Jun 13, 2017 Board of Directors Study Session
Access Public
Type Discussion
Goals 7.0 Finance
7.5 Evaluate an appropriate reserve program for District funds and develop an inclusive
reserve policy
Operating Reserves Report Aug 2015.pdf (574 KB)
C. CLOSING ITEMS
Subject 1. Oral Communications & Director Comments
Meeting Jun 13, 2017 Board of Directors Study Session
Access Public
Type Procedural
C. CLOSING ITEMS
THE NEXT STUDY SESSION OF THE COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS WILL BE HELD ON
TUESDAY, JULY 11, 2017 AT 9:30 A.M. IN THE DISTRICTS BOARD ROOM, 290 PAULARINO AVENUE, COSTA MESA.
Subject 2. Adjournment
Meeting Jun 13, 2017 Board of Directors Study Session
Access Public
Type Procedural