Agenda_2015_6_9_Meeting
Costa Mesa Sanitary District
... an Independent Special District
AGENDA
Michael Scheafer
President
Arthur Perry
Vice President
Robert Ooten
Secretary
Arlene Schafer
Assistant Secretary
James Ferryman
Director
Public Comments. Any member of the public may address the Board. Speakers on
agenda items should identify themselves to the Deputy Clerk before the meeting so that
their input can be provided at the time the item is considered. Speakers on non-agenda
items will be heard under Public Comments. Pursuant to State law, the Board may not
discuss or take action on non-agenda items except under special circumstances.
Speakers must limit their remarks to three minutes or as decided upon by the Presiding
Officer. The Presiding Officer reserves the right to declare any speaker out of order.
Obtaining Agenda Materials: The public is entitled to copies of all documents that
are made part of the agenda packet. If any document or other writing pertaining to an
agenda item is distributed to all or a majority of the Board after the packet is prepared,
a copy of that writing may be obtained at the District offices at 628 W. 19th Street,
Costa Mesa, California. The Deputy Clerk of the District may be contacted at (949)
645-8400.
In Compliance with ADA: Contact Noelani Middenway, (949) 645-8400, 48 hours prior
to meeting if assistance is needed (28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II).
Study Session - Tuesday, June 9, 2015
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
(If absences occur, consider whether to deem those absences excused based on
facts presented for the absence - such determination shall be the permission
required by law.)
III. PUBLIC COMMENTS
This time has been set aside for persons in the audience to make comments on
items within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Costa Mesa Sanitary District that
are not listed on this agenda. Members of the public will have the opportunity to
address the Board of Directors about all other items on this agenda at the time
those items are considered.
Under the provisions of the Brown Act, the Board of Directors is prohibited from
taking action on oral requests but may refer the matter to staff or to a subsequent
meeting. The Board of Directors will respond after public comment has been
received. Please state your name. Each speaker will be limited to four (4)
continuous minutes.
IV. ITEMS OF STUDY
1. Recycling & Waste Diversion Reports - May 2015
Recommendation: That the Board of Directors receive and file the report.
2. Code Enforcement Officer Report - May 2015
Recommendation: That the Board of Directors receive and file the report.
3. Trash Carts Stored in Alleys - Update
Recommendation: That the Board of Directors receive and file the report.
4. Fats, Oil and Grease (FOG) Program
Recommendation: That the Board of Directors receive and file the report
from Environmental Engineering & Contracting, Inc. (EEC).
5. Legislative Analysis
Recommendation: That the Board of Directors receive and file the report.
6. Consider Expanding Door-to-Door Household Hazardous Waste (HHW)
Collections to all CMSD Residents
Recommendation: That the Board of Directors direct staff to maintain the
status quo and continue to partner with OC Waste & Recycling and Orange
Coast College (OCC) to provide 1-day collection events every other year.
7. Organics Ad Hoc Committee Update - Oral Report
Recommendation: That the Board of Directors receive an oral report from
Secretary Ooten.
8. Project #101 Westside Pump Station Abandonment Design and Engineering
Phase – Oral Report
Recommendation: That the Board of Directors consider options for the
design and engineering phase of Project #101 - Westside Pump Station
Abandonment.
9. Future Study Session Items
Recommendation: That the Board of Directors provide staff with direction on items
to be placed on future study session agendas.
V. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS AND DIRECTOR COMMENTS
VI. ADJOURNMENT
THE NEXT STUDY SESSION OF THE COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT BOARD
OF DIRECTORS WILL BE HELD ON TUESDAY, JULY 14, 2015 AT 9:30 A.M. IN
THE DISTRICTS BOARD ROOM, 628 W. 19TH STREET.
Costa Mesa Sanitary District
... an Independent Special District
Recycling & Waste Diversion Reports - May 2015
Item Number: 1.
Recommendation/Notes:
Recommendation: That the Board of Directors receive and file the report.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Recycling & Waste Diversion Report Cover Memo
CR Transfer CR Transfer
To:Javier Ochiqui To:Javier Ochiqui
From: CR Transfer Inc.From: CR Transfer Inc.
Jurisdiction:Costa Mesa Sanitary District (9)Jurisdiction:Costa Mesa Sanitary District Santa Ana Heights (11)
Month/Year:May-15 Month/Year:May-15
Recycling Report Recycling Report
Recycle Tons Recycle Tons
Commodity Percentage Recycled Commodity Percentage Recycled
Paper(cardboard+mixed paper)9.50%303.80 Green Waste 20.50%33.63
Plastics(mixed plastic+HDPE+PET)2.73%87.30 GW Fines 6.99%11.47
Metal(metal+aluminum+alum. Cans)3.91%125.04 Fines 9.99%16.39
Wood 2.92%93.38 Textiles 0.17%0.28
Greenwaste 34.77%1,111.91 Glass 1.89%3.10
Liquids 0.37%11.83 Paper 4.29%7.03
Fines 0.52%16.63 Plastic 5.58%9.15
Glass(bottles)2.03%64.92 Food Waste 0.00%-
Concrete 0.33%10.55 Metal 1.20%1.97
Concrete 0.51%0.84
Wood 0.86%1.41
Totals 57.08%1,825.36 Totals 51.97%85.27
Total Tonnage 3,197.90 Total Tonnage 164.07
Recycled Tonnage 1,825.36 Recycled Tonnage 85.27
Landfill Tonnage 1,372.54 Landfill Tonnage 78.80
JULY AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE TOTAL
3,906.93 3,403.96 3,461.33 3,577.08 3,144.65 3,685.73 3,483.11 3,181.54 3,560.85 3,545.48 3,361.97 38,312.63
2,218.01 1,936.10 1,969.05 2,030.68 1,785.99 2,092.55 1,979.46 1,807.01 2,023.75 2,012.83 1,910.63 21,766.06
1,688.92 1,467.86 1,492.28 1,546.40 1,358.66 1,593.18 1,503.65 1,374.53 1,537.10 1,532.65 1,451.34 16,546.57
56.77%56.88%56.89%56.77%56.79%56.77%56.83%56.80%56.83%56.77%56.83%#DIV/0!56.81%Recycled %
CMSD
WASTE DIVERSION REPORT FY 2014-2015
Total Tonnage
Recycled Tonnage
Landfilled Tonnage
Costa Mesa Sanitary District
... an Independent Special District
Code Enforcement Officer Report - May 2015
Item Number: 2.
Recommendation/Notes:
Recommendation: That the Board of Directors receive and file the report.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Code Enforcement Officer Report Cover Memo
Protecting our community's health and the environment by providing solid waste and sewer collection services.
www.cmsdca.gov
Costa Mesa Sanitary District
….an Independent Special District
Memorandum
To: Board of Directors
Via: Scott Carroll, General Manager
From: Edward Roberts, Code Enforcement Officer
Date: June 9, 2015
Subject: Code Enforcement Officer Report – May 2015
This report summarizes major points for three ordinance enforcement topics covering
scavenging, graffiti, and trash container enforcement. For the month of May, the
CMSD Code Enforcement Officer focused his efforts on patrols in various parts of the community. The goal was identify and deter instances of scavenging and residential
trash carts left within the public view.
In the month of May 2015, we saw a reduced number of complaints filed with CMSD
Code Enforcement staff regarding scavenging activity in the city. As with most scavenging complaints, the alleged violations take place in the early morning hours. In
order to address resident concerns, the Code Enforcement Officer investigated all
complaints and adjusted his schedule to accommodate requests for early morning or
weekend enforcement. Included below are instances of scavenging that were detected
while the Officer was investigating specific complaints.
Proactive Scavenging Investigations:
671 Governor Street- As Officer Roberts was patrolling the 600 block of Governor Street, he observed a male subject rummaging through a CMSD cart that was placed
in front of the residence at 671 Governor Street. Officer Roberts contacted the male
and asked him what he was doing. The male stated that he was looking for recyclables
in order to provide for himself.
Board of Directors May 2015
Officer Roberts instructed the male to cease removing recyclables from the cart and
return all items. The subject was advised that he would be issued a citation if observed
scavenging though CMSD carts. The male stated that he understood and was sent on his way.
379 Hamilton Street–Officer Roberts observed a male subject walking through the residential street and noted that he had numerous plastic/glass bottles in a plastic bag
with him. Officer Roberts contacted the male subject and let him know that scavenging
is a prohibited activity. The male subject was advised to return all recyclable material
to a nearby cart and sent on his way with an advisement.
628 Joann Street- While conducting regular patrol in the 600 block of Joann Street,
Officer Roberts observed a male walking with a clear trash bag with that contained several plastic bottles. While in front of the residence at 628 Joann Street, Officer
Roberts observed the male open the lid of a CMSD trash cart and began to rummage
through the interior.
Officer Roberts approached the male and made contact with him. During the course of the contact, Officer Roberts advised the male that scavenging is a prohibited activity
and directed him to return all recyclable materials to the CMSD cart. The male
complied with the instructions and was later sent on his way.
587 Knowell Place- A subject was observed at the aforementioned location
rummaging through a CMSD trash cart. Officer Roberts contacted the subject and determined that he was in fact scavenging. The subject was cooperative and advised regarding policy. Once the recyclable items had been returned to a nearby CMSD cart,
he was sent on his way with an advisement.
2104 Wallace Avenue- While on patrol in the 2100 block of Wallace Avenue, Officer
Roberts observed a male subject, rummaging through a CMSD trash cart located in
front of 2104 Wallace Avenue. Officer Roberts made contact with the subject to investigate scavenging activity.
During the course of the contact, the subject admitted that he regularly obtains
recyclable material from CMSD carts and recycles items in order to support himself.
Officer Roberts explained to the subject that scavenging is prohibited activity and was sent on his way.
END OF SCAVENGING ENFORCEMENT REPORT
Trash Container Enforcement:
In the month of May 2015, there were a few customer complaints reported to the
District Headquarters regarding trash carts in public view. The following is a list of locations where trash cart violations were found and addressed by the Courtesy Notice
process.
Board of Directors May 2015
Total Cases: 41
The following locations received warnings:
(1) American Avenue - Storage of carts in public view.
(2) College Avenue-Storage of carts in public view
(1) Congress Avenue- Storage of carts in public view.
(2) Fullerton Avenue- Storage of carts in public view.
(1) Governor Street- Storage of carts in public view.
(3) Joann Street - Storage of carts in public view.
(1) Jefferson Avenue - Storage of carts in public view.
(2) Maple Street - Storage of carts in public view.
(1) Monrovia Avenue-Storage of carts in public view
(2) National Avenue - Storage of carts in public view.
(3) Orange Avenue- Storage of carts in public view.
(2) Pomona Avenue - Storage of carts in public view.
(2) Republic Avenue - Storage of carts in public view.
(2) Rutgers Drive- Storage of carts in public view.
(1) Samar Drive- Storage of carts in public view.
(3) Santa Ana Avenue - Storage of carts in public view.
(2) Surf Street - Storage of carts in public view.
(2) Senate Street - Storage of carts in public view.
(2) Tustin Avenue-Storage of carts in public view.
(3) Wallace Avenue - Storage of carts in public view.
Board of Directors May 2015
(1) Westminster Avenue - Storage of carts in public view.
(2) Victoria Street - Storage of carts in the public view.
END OF TRASH CONTAINER ENFORCEMENT REPORT
Costa Mesa Sanitary District
Scavenging Report – May 2015
Locations:
• 671 Governor St.
• 379 Hamilton St.
• 628 Joann St.
• 587 Knowell Pl.
• 2104 Wallace Ave.
Costa Mesa Sanitary District
... an Independent Special District
Trash Carts Stored in Alleys - Update
Item Number: 3.
Recommendation/Notes:
Recommendation: That the Board of Directors receive and file the report.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Trash Carts Stored in Alleys Cover Memo
Protecting our community's health and the environment by providing solid waste and sewer collection services.
www.cmsdca.gov
Costa Mesa Sanitary District
….an Independent Special District
Memorandum
To: Board of Directors
Via: Scott Carroll, General Manager
From: Javier Ochiqui, Management Analyst
Date: June 9, 2015
Subject: Trash Carts Stored in Alleys - Update
Summary
On December 10, 2013, staff provided the Board of Directors with an update of the
pilot program regarding trash carts stored in alleys. The pilot program indicated that
overall, 70 percent of the residents responded favorably; however, 30 percent
continued to remain non-compliant. At that time, the Board of Directors had no more interest in going beyond the pilot program that was conducted in 2013.
Staff Recommendation
That the Board of Directors receive and file the report.
Analysis
The pilot program focused on 7 alleys with approximately 150 homes (including multi-
family dwelling). Overall, 70 percent of the residents responded favorably but 30 percent did not comply with our courtesy notices (Attachment A). Staff informed the Board that a District-wide notice was also published in the CMSD newsletter illustrating
proper placement of trash carts in the alleys.
The Board was pleased with the pilot program results and stated that they had no more interest in going beyond the pilot program. The Board did not approve erecting permanent signs at the beginning and end of each alley. The Board clearly stated that
they did not support spending more time and money and suggested partnering up with
the City since it was also a fire-safety and Fire Department access issue (Attachment
B).
Board of Directors June 9, 2015
Page 2 of 2
Staff will print another story in the CMSD newsletter and staff will be working with City
staff to have this issue mentioned in their Costa Mesa Minute Video, on their CMTV,
and on their Fire Department’s website. The District’s current Code Enforcement Officer knows the City very well and is familiar with the 129 alleys in Costa Mesa. Per
the Board’s direction, staff will continue to use the soft approach of educating the
residents of the District’s requirements to keep trash carts out of public view and off
the public right-of-way.
Strategic Plan Element & Goal
This item complies with the objective and strategy of Strategic Element 2.0, Solid Waste, which states:
“Objective: Our objective is to manage the collection and recycling of residential trash
in the most economical and environmentally friendly way.”
“Strategy: We will do this by looking for ways to improve efficiencies, achieve high
customer satisfaction, and considering prudent new recycling methods.”
Legal Review Not applicable at this time.
Environmental Review The requirement to place trash containers out of view to improve aesthetics and prevent scavenging is not a disturbance of the environment directly or indirectly similar
to grading or construction and is not a project under CEQA or the District’s CEQA
Guidelines.
Financial Review
None at this time; however, if the Board decides to expand the program, there may be
additional costs associated.
Public Notice Process
Copies of this report are on file and will be included with the complete agenda packet for the May 12, 2015, Board of Directors Study Session meeting at District
Headquarters and posted on the District’s website.
Attachments:
A – 12/10/13 Staff Report B – 12/10/13 Minutes of the Board of Directors Study Session
Protecting our community's health and the environment by providing solid waste and sewer collection services.
www.cmsdca.gov
Costa Mesa Sanitary District
….an Independent Special District
Memorandum
To: Board of Directors
Via: Scott Carroll, General Manager
From: Javier Ochiqui, Management Analyst
Date: December 10, 2013
Subject: Trash Cans in Alley (Update)
Summary
On August 20, 2012, the Board of Directors directed Costa Mesa Sanitary District
(CMSD) staff to start enforcing trash cans that are left out in the alleys, especially left in the public right away. Staff is providing the Board of Directors with a program
update.
Staff Recommendation
That the Board of Directors receive and file the report.
Analysis
There are approximately 129 alleys in the City of Costa Mesa and about 2,150 homes
with alleys. So far, CMSD’s part-time Ordinance Enforcement Officer has inspected 7
alleys which is approximately 150 homes (including multi-dwellings). Overall, 70 percent of the residents have responded favorably, however, 30 percent have gone
back to their old habits of leaving residential trash cans out in the alleys and in public
right away. Below is a graph illustrating the effectiveness of the program:
Attachment A
Board of Directors December 10, 2013
Page 2 of 3
CMSD’s Enforcement Officer will continue to monitor the alleys. However, at the
current pace, it will take a very long time to enforce all 129 alleys. Also, without constant enforcement on the previous alleys, staff believes that most of the residents will eventually go back to their old ways and leave residential trash cans on the alleys
and on the public right away.
Strategic Plan Element & Goal
This item complies the with objective and strategy of Strategic Element 2.0, Solid Waste, which states:
“Objective: Our objective is to manage the collection and recycling of residential trash
in the most economical and environmentally friendly way.”
“Strategy: We will do this by looking for ways to improve efficiencies, achieve high
customer satisfaction, and considering prudent new recycling methods.”
Legal Review
Not applicable at this time.
Environmental Review
The requirement to place trash containers out of view to improve aesthetics and
prevent scavenging is not a disturbance of the environment directly or indirectly similar to grading or construction and is not a project under CEQA or the District’s CEQA
Guidelines.
Attachment A
Board of Directors December 10, 2013
Page 3 of 3
Financial Review
None at this time; however, if the Boards decides to expand the program, there may be additional costs associated. However, the exact cost is unknown at this time.
Public Notice Process
Copies of this report are on file and will be included with the complete agenda packet
for the December 10, 2013 Board of Directors Study Session meeting at District
Headquarters and posted on the District’s website.
Attachment A
Attachment B
Attachment B
Costa Mesa Sanitary District
... an Independent Special District
Fats, Oil and Grease (FOG) Program
Item Number: 4.
Recommendation/Notes:
Recommendation: That the Board of Directors receive and file the report from
Environmental Engineering & Contracting, Inc. (EEC).
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
FOG Enforcement Cover Memo
CM
S
D
F
O
G
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
Ac
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
a
n
d
Re
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
By
E
E
C
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
6/
9
/
2
0
1
5
CM
S
D
B
o
a
r
d
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
1
FO
G
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
•
Ri
s
k
-
B
a
s
e
d
F
S
E
I
n
s
p
e
c
t
i
o
n
/
P
r
i
o
r
i
t
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
•
FO
G
C
o
n
t
r
o
l
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
Ou
t
r
e
a
c
h
•
FS
E
E
n
f
o
r
c
e
m
e
n
t
C
o
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
•
FS
E
D
a
t
a
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
•
Pl
a
n
R
e
v
i
e
w
/
C
u
s
t
o
m
e
r
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
S
u
p
p
o
r
t
•
FO
G
S
o
u
r
c
e
C
h
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
/
H
o
t
s
p
o
t
Re
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
6/
9
/
2
0
1
5
CM
S
D
B
o
a
r
d
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
2
FS
E
I
n
v
e
n
t
o
r
y
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
6/
9
/
2
0
1
5
CM
S
D
B
o
a
r
d
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
3
•
Co
u
n
t
y
H
e
a
l
t
h
C
a
r
e
A
g
e
n
c
y
R
e
v
i
e
w
•
Ci
t
y
C
o
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
•
Pl
a
n
R
e
v
i
e
w
•
Si
n
c
e
J
a
n
u
a
r
y
2
0
1
4
Ne
w
F
S
E
s
=
4
1
LF
P
F
S
E
s
=
1
1
Pr
i
o
r
i
t
i
z
e
d
f
o
r
I
n
s
p
e
c
t
i
o
n
=
3
0
In
i
t
i
a
l
I
n
s
p
e
c
t
i
o
n
F
r
e
q
u
e
n
c
y
Cr
i
t
e
r
i
a
6/
9
/
2
0
1
5
CM
S
D
B
o
a
r
d
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
4
•
Pr
e
s
e
n
c
e
o
f
H
i
g
h
R
i
s
k
Co
o
k
i
n
g
E
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
•
Ho
t
s
p
o
t
S
t
a
t
u
s
•
Gr
e
a
s
e
I
n
t
e
r
c
e
p
t
o
r
St
a
t
u
s
•
BM
P
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
In
s
p
e
c
t
i
o
n
F
r
e
q
u
e
n
c
y
St
a
t
s
6/
9
/
2
0
1
5
CM
S
D
B
o
a
r
d
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
5
•
To
t
a
l
F
S
E
s
=
5
0
6
Qu
a
r
t
e
r
l
y
=
5
1
Se
m
i
-
A
n
n
u
a
l
=
7
4
An
n
u
a
l
=
1
3
6
Bi
-
A
n
n
u
a
l
=
2
4
5
In
s
p
e
c
t
i
o
n
F
r
e
q
u
e
n
c
i
e
s
Mo
d
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
6/
9
/
2
0
1
5
CM
S
D
B
o
a
r
d
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
6
•
In
s
p
e
c
t
i
o
n
C
o
m
p
l
i
a
n
c
e
H
i
s
t
o
r
y
•
Ma
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
/
C
C
T
V
O
b
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
s
•
HC
A
I
n
s
p
e
c
t
i
o
n
C
o
m
p
l
i
a
n
c
e
Hi
s
t
o
r
y
•
In
s
p
e
c
t
i
o
n
F
i
e
l
d
O
b
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
s
Il
l
i
c
i
t
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
Pr
i
v
a
t
e
S
S
O
s
Re
s
t
r
i
c
t
e
d
E
f
f
l
u
e
n
t
In
s
p
e
c
t
i
o
n
F
r
e
q
u
e
n
c
i
e
s
Mo
d
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
6/
9
/
2
0
1
5
CM
S
D
B
o
a
r
d
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
7
•
Ma
j
o
r
C
h
i
c
k
e
n
C
h
a
i
n
Or
i
g
i
n
a
l
l
y
A
n
n
u
a
l
I
n
s
p
e
c
t
i
o
n
F
r
e
q
u
e
n
c
y
Co
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
N
o
n
-
c
o
m
p
l
i
a
n
c
e
(
F
O
G
>
5
0
%
)
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
I
n
s
p
e
c
t
i
o
n
F
r
e
q
u
e
n
c
y
t
o
Qu
a
r
t
e
r
l
y
Co
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
C
o
m
p
l
i
a
n
c
e
•
Po
p
u
l
a
r
B
r
e
a
k
f
a
s
t
F
S
E
Or
i
g
i
n
a
l
l
y
Q
u
a
r
t
e
r
l
y
I
n
s
p
e
c
t
i
o
n
F
r
e
q
u
e
n
c
y
In
i
t
i
a
l
N
o
n
-
C
o
m
p
l
i
a
n
c
e
(
F
O
G
>
2
5
%
)
Co
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
C
o
m
p
l
i
a
n
c
e
a
n
d
D
e
c
r
e
a
s
e
i
n
Ho
t
S
p
o
t
C
l
e
a
n
i
n
g
F
r
e
q
u
e
n
c
y
Ad
j
u
s
t
e
d
I
n
s
p
e
c
t
i
o
n
F
r
e
q
u
e
n
c
y
t
o
S
e
m
i
-
An
n
u
a
l
HO
T
S
p
o
t
R
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
6/
9
/
2
0
1
5
CM
S
D
B
o
a
r
d
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
8
•
97
H
o
t
S
p
o
t
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
i
n
2
0
1
1
Ro
o
t
I
n
t
r
u
s
i
o
n
St
r
u
c
t
u
r
a
l
D
e
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
i
e
s
FO
G
D
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e
•
36
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
l
y
Co
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
R
e
h
a
b
i
l
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
Cl
e
a
n
i
n
g
O
b
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
s
So
u
r
c
e
C
o
n
t
r
o
l
(
S
h
o
p
p
i
n
g
C
e
n
t
e
r
s
)
•
Ne
w
p
o
r
t
B
l
v
d
.
Pr
i
v
a
t
e
p
u
m
p
s
t
a
t
i
o
n
No
t
c
l
e
a
n
i
n
g
r
e
g
u
l
a
r
l
y
Mo
v
e
d
c
l
e
a
n
i
n
g
f
r
e
q
u
e
n
c
y
t
o
qu
a
r
t
e
r
l
y
•
Pa
u
l
a
r
i
n
o
A
v
e
.
a
n
d
T
r
i
n
i
t
y
D
r
.
Co
n
d
u
c
t
i
n
g
R
e
m
o
d
e
l
In
s
t
a
l
l
i
n
g
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
e
g
r
a
v
i
t
y
g
r
e
a
s
e
i
n
t
e
r
c
e
p
t
o
r
s
In
s
t
a
l
l
i
n
g
n
e
w
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
l
a
t
e
r
a
l
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
•
Br
i
s
t
o
l
S
t
.
a
n
d
R
e
d
H
i
l
l
A
v
e
.
Mu
l
t
i
p
l
e
F
S
E
s
W
i
t
h
o
u
t
G
C
D
Wo
r
k
i
n
g
w
i
t
h
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
o
w
n
e
r
t
o
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
F
O
G
En
c
o
u
r
a
g
i
n
g
t
h
e
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
G
C
D
s
FO
G
D
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
6/
9
/
2
0
1
5
CM
S
D
B
o
a
r
d
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
9
Ke
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
T
r
e
n
d
6/
9
/
2
0
1
5
CM
S
D
B
o
a
r
d
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
1
0
012345678910 06
/
0
7
0
7
/
0
8
0
8
/
0
9
0
9
/
1
0
1
0
/
1
1
1
1
/
1
2
1
2
/
1
3
1
3
/
1
4
1
4
/
1
5
N
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
P
u
b
l
i
c
S
S
O
s
Total Public SSOs FOG Related Public SSOs
FO
G
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
Re
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
•
Co
n
t
i
n
u
e
R
i
s
k
-
B
a
s
e
d
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
f
o
r
F
S
E
I
n
s
p
e
c
t
i
o
n
Pr
i
o
r
i
t
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
•
Ho
t
s
p
o
t
R
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
/
S
o
u
r
c
e
I
n
v
e
s
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
Wo
r
k
w
i
t
h
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
m
a
n
a
g
e
r
s
t
o
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
F
O
G
d
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e
•
FS
E
I
n
s
p
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
/
E
n
f
o
r
c
e
m
e
n
t
,
F
o
c
u
s
i
n
g
o
n
:
Ch
r
o
n
i
c
n
o
n
-
c
o
m
p
l
i
a
n
c
e
i
s
s
u
e
s
Ex
c
e
s
s
i
v
e
F
O
G
d
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e
6/
9
/
2
0
1
5
CM
S
D
B
o
a
r
d
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
1
1
Qu
e
s
t
i
o
n
s
?
6/
9
/
2
0
1
5
CM
S
D
B
o
a
r
d
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
1
2
•
Jo
s
e
p
h
J
e
n
k
i
n
s
EE
C
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
jj
e
n
k
i
n
s
@
e
e
c
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
.
c
o
m
71
4
-
6
6
7
-
2
3
0
0
Costa Mesa Sanitary District
... an Independent Special District
Legislative Analysis
Item Number: 5.
Recommendation/Notes:
Recommendation: That the Board of Directors receive and file the report.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Legislative Analysis Cover Memo
Protecting our community's health and the environment by providing solid waste and sewer collection services.
www.cmsdca.gov
Costa Mesa Sanitary District
….an Independent Special District
California Legislative Analysis
The Legislative Analysis provides the Board of Directors with analyses of measures pending
in Sacramento that are of interest to the District. On July 22, 2010, the Board of Directors gave authority to the President to write support and/or opposition letters on behalf of the
Board if that position has been taken by an agency the District is a member of. For all other
bills, staff recommendations for formal District positions on legislation will be agendized and
presented for Board action at their regular Board of Directors meetings. When the Board takes formal action on a piece of legislation, the President will advocate the support or
opposition of individual bills as approved by the Board. This Legislative Analysis also
provides the Board of Directors with informative updates on State issues.
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
1. SUPPORT: AB 199 (Eggman)
AB 888 (Bloom)
2. OPPOSE:
AB 45 (Mullin)
AB 676 (Calderon)
3. WATCH:
AB 1017 (Campos)
AB 1063 (Williams) AB 1447 (Alejo) SB 272 (Hertzberg)
Legislative Analysis June 09, 2015
Page 2 of 6
SACRAMENTO LEGISLATIVE REPORT
CMSD SUPPORT BILLS
AB 199 (Eggman) Sales Tax Exemption–As Introduced on January 29, 2015–SUPPORT
Author: Assembly Member Eggman
Status: 03/23/2015-passed by Com. of Natural Resources
Hearing Date: 05/11/2015 Reviewed: ASSEMBLY OF REVENUE AND TAX
Supported By: Californians Against Waste
Assoc. of Postconsumer Plastic Recyclers Assoc. of Compost Producers
CA Resource Recovery Association
CA State Treasurer John Chiang
California Compost Coalition
California Electronic Asset Recovery California League of Conservation Voters
California Manufacturers & Technology Association
California Refuse Recycling Coalition
California Resource Recovery Association
Solid Waste Association of North America
Watched By: CSDA
Analysis: This bill provides a full sales tax exemption on purchases of equipment used in recycling, composting or manufacturing with recycled content. This bill will add recycled
content manufacturing and processing to the Advanced Transportation and Alternative
Sources Manufacturing Sales and Use Tax Exclusion Program. It also provides an important
incentive to recycle more materials and reintroduce more recyclable materials into California’s manufacturing economy.
AB 888 (Bloom) Waste Management: Plastic Microbeads–As Introduced on February 3,
2014 – SUPPORT
Author: Assembly Member Bloom
Status: 05/22/15- In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
Hearing Date: TBD Reviewed: ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Supported By: Californians Against Waste
CASA
Opposed By: Watched By: CSDA
Analysis: This bill would assist in the reduction of microplastic bead pollution in our oceans. It
would also reduce the environmental and health hazards associated with microplastic beads.
This bill will reduce the problem at the source by prohibiting all plastic microbeads in personal care and cleaning products and favor nature-made alternative ingredients, such as apricot shells, jojoba beans, sea salt, and sand that are already widely available in natural products.
AB 888 is widely regarded amongst stakeholders as the model policy that will not only result in
a cleaner environment, but also reduce a health hazard to humans and our marine and aquatic wildlife.
Legislative Analysis June 09, 2015
Page 3 of 6
CMSD OPPOSE BILLS
AB 45 (Mullin) Household Hazardous Waste-As Introduced on April 21, 2015 – OPPOSE
Author: Assembly Member Mullin
Status: 06/01/15-suspense file. Hearing Date: None
Reviewed: ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Supported By:
Opposed By: League of California Cities Rural County Representatives of California
Solid Waste Association of North America
OC Board of Supervisors OC Waste and Recycling
Watched By: CSDA
Analysis: The California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989, which is administered by
the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery, requires, among other things, each
city and each county to prepare a household hazardous waste element containing specified components, and to submit that element to the department for approval. Existing law requires the department to approve the element if the local agency demonstrates that it will comply with
specified requirements. A city or county is required to submit an annual report to the
department summarizing its progress in reducing solid waste, including an update of the jurisdiction’s household hazardous waste element.
This bill would require each jurisdiction that provides for the residential collection and disposal of solid waste to increase the collection and diversion of household hazardous waste in its service area, on or before July 1, 2020, by 15% over a baseline amount, to be determined in
accordance with department regulations. The bill would authorize the department to adopt a
model ordinance for a comprehensive program for the collection of household hazardous waste to facilitate compliance with those provisions, and would require each jurisdiction to
annually report to the department on progress achieved in complying with those provisions. By
imposing new duties on local agencies, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts
for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making
that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
AB 676 (Calderon) Employment Discrimination– As Introduced on February 25, 2015 –
Oppose
Author: Assembly Member Calderon
Status: 8/26/2013 – In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the
request of the author. Hearing Date: Pending Referral
Reviewed: ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES
Supported By: Opposed By: Association of California Community College Administrators Watched By: CASA, CSDA, CSAC
Legislative Analysis June 09, 2015
Page 4 of 6
Analysis: This bill would prohibit an employer or employment agency from asking an applicant for employment to disclose, orally or in writing, information concerning the applicant's current
employment status, except as specified. The bill would prohibit an employer, an employment
agency, or a person operating an Internet Web site for posting jobs from interfering with, or
discriminating against, a person exercising these rights. The District uses employment history to determine and confirm training and experience.
CMSD WATCH BILLS
AB 1017 (Campos) Employers: Gender Pay Equity– As Introduced on February 26, 2015
– WATCH
Author: Assembly Member Campos
Status: 05/21/15- In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. Hearing Date: None
Reviewed: ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON FLOOR ANALYSIS
Supported By: California Women’s Law Center Opposed By: Watched By: CASA, CSDA
Analysis: Existing law generally prohibits an employer from paying an employee at wage rates less than the rates paid to employees of the opposite sex in the same establishment. Existing
law further imposes penalties on an employer who violates this provision, subjecting the
employer to civil action and specifying liquidated damages that may be paid to an employee who is paid unfairly. This bill would state the intent of the Legislature that would require pay equity for women in the workplace.
AB 1063 (Williams) Solid Waste: As Introduced on February 25, 2015 – WATCH
Author: Assembly Member Williams
Status: 06/01/15- In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
Hearing Date: None Reviewed: ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES
Supported By:
Opposed By: Californians Against Waste Recycle Smart
Watched By: CASA, CSDA, SWANA
Analysis: Existing law requires the operator of a disposal facility to pay to the State Board of Equalization a fee based on the amount of all solid waste disposed of at each disposal site.
The act requires the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery to establish the
amount of the fee, as specified, and limits the fee to a maximum of $1.40 per ton. This bill would require, on or before July 1, 2016, the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery, to hold a public hearing and workshop to develop a proposal for the Legislature
regarding a new solid waste management fee which would provide the department with the
revenue necessary to carry out certain actions. The bill would require the department, within 6 months of the public hearing and workshop, to propose a new solid waste management fee to
the Legislature.
AB 1447 (Alejo) Minimum Recycled Content Standard– As Introduced on February 27,
2015 – WATCH
Legislative Analysis June 09, 2015
Page 5 of 6
Author: Assembly Member Melendez
Status: 05/28/15 -In committee: Held under submission. Hearing Date: None
Reviewed: ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Supported By: Assoc. of Postconsumer Plastic Recyclers
Boretech Californians Against Waste
California Plastics Recyclers Coalition
California Refuse Recycling Coalition CarbonLITE
Don’t Waste LA Project
EcoPET
Global Plastics Los Angeles Alliance for a New Economy
Marin Sanitary Service
Napa Recycling and Waste Services Peninsula Packaging, LLC Peninsula Plastics Recycling
Potential Industries
RePET Replanet
Stopwaste
Tri-CED Community Recycling Verdeco Waste Management
Zanker Road Resource Management
Natural Resources Defense Council Opposed By:
Watched By: CSDA
Analysis: This bill establishes minimum recycled content standards for polyethylene terephthalate (PET) food and beverage packaging manufactured or filled in the state. Existing
law requires all rigid plastic bottles and rigid plastic containers, including bottles and containers
composed of polyethylene terephthalate (PET), sold in California to be labeled with a code which indicates the resin used to produce the rigid plastic bottle or rigid plastic container. This
bill would require, commencing July 1, 2016, PET plastic packaging manufactured in the state
to be manufactured with, and empty PET plastic packaging imported into the state to be filled with food or drink in the state for sale in the state to contain, a minimum of 10% of PET plastic, as measured by weight. The bill would require, commencing January 1, 2017, and annually
thereafter, every such manufacturer or importer of PET plastic packaging to demonstrate
compliance with that requirement by certifying to the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery certain information. The bill would provide that a person who violates these
provisions is guilty of an infraction and may be assessed civil penalties.
SB 272 (Hertzberg) Public Records Act–As Introduced on February 19, 2015– SUPPORT
Author: Senator Hertzberg
Status: 04/21/15-Re-referred to Com. on RLS. Hearing Date: None
Reviewed: ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT
Supported By: American Federation of State, County, and Municipal
Employees AFL-CIO
Legislative Analysis June 09, 2015
Page 6 of 6
California Business Roundtable
California Professional Firefighters San Francisco Technology Democrats
Sunlight Foundation
Opposed By: Unknown
Watched By: CSDA Analysis: The California Public Records Act requires state and local agencies to make public records available for inspection by the public, with specified exceptions. This bill would require
each local agency to create a catalog of enterprise systems, as defined, post that catalog on
the local agency's website, and make the catalog publicly available upon request in the office of the clerk of the agency's legislative body.
Costa Mesa Sanitary District
... an Independent Special District
Consider Expanding Door-to-Door Household Hazardous Waste (HHW) Collections to
all CMSD Residents
Item Number: 6.
Recommendation/Notes:
Recommendation: That the Board of Directors direct staff to maintain the status quo and
continue to partner with OC Waste & Recycling and Orange Coast College (OCC) to provide
1-day collection events every other year.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Consider Expanding Door-to-Door HHW Program Cover Memo
Protecting our community's health and the environment by providing solid waste and sewer collection services.
www.cmsdca.gov
Costa Mesa Sanitary District
….an Independent Special District
Memorandum
To: Board of Directors
Via: Scott Carroll, General Manager
From: Javier Ochiqui, Management Analyst
Date: June 9, 2015
Subject: Consider Expanding Door-to-Door Household Hazardous Waste (HHW)
Collections to all CMSD Residents
Summary
The Costa Mesa Sanitary District (CMSD) currently offers a free Door-to-Door
Household Hazardous Waste (HHW) collection program to CMSD residents who may
not otherwise have the ability to recycle or dispose of their hazardous materials at the County’s four HHW permanent facilities. The program allows senior citizens, immobile
and/or disabled individuals to dispose of their HHW materials without leaving their
homes. All other CMSD residents are encouraged to use one of the County’s free
HHW collection centers. Staff is providing options should the Board of Directors
consider expanding the program to all CMSD residents.
Staff Recommendation That the Board of Directors direct staff to maintain the status quo and continue to
partner with OC Waste & Recycling and Orange Coast College (OCC) to provide 1-day
collection events every other year.
Analysis
Products that contain corrosive, toxic, ignitable, or reactive chemicals are considered
to be HHW. Products such as paints, cleaners, oils, batteries, and pesticides that contain potentially hazardous ingredients require special care when you dispose of
them. Improper disposal of HHW can include pouring the product down the drain, on
the ground, into storm sewers, or in some cases putting them out with the trash. The
dangers of such disposal methods can pollute the environment and pose a threat to
human health.
Board of Directors June 9, 2015
Page 2 of 5
Orange County residents can dispose of their HHW items for free at any of the County’s four HHW collection centers. The following cities offer Door-to-Door HHW
collection services to all of their residents:
City Hauler Cost Per Household
Aliso Viejo (paint only) CR&R Environmental Services Fixed Fee*
Dana Point CR&R Environmental Services $0.31 per month*
San Clemente CR&R Environmental Services $0.31 per month*
Tustin CR&R Environmental Services $0.31 per month*
*For safety and regulatory purposes, a maximum of 15 gallons or 125 pounds may be transported per
pick-up. It is illegal to exceed these limits.
CR&R Environmental Services charges $0.31 per household, per month and allows for
two Door-to-Door HHW collection pick-ups per household, per year. CMSD has
approximately 21,816 households and implementation of the program would cost
approximately $81,155.52 per year. Staff does not recommend this option.
Staff reviewed the OC Waste and Recycling’s HHW collection center usage reports for
Costa Mesa for Fiscal Years 11/12, 12/13, and 13/14, and approximately 2,530
vehicles/households from Costa Mesa participated annually, generating an average of
141,680 pounds of HHW per year. In comparison, the 1-day HHW event that CMSD
organizes every other year attracts an average of 308 vehicles per year and generates an average of 28,000 pounds of HHW material per event and costs approximately
$20,000 per event.
Staff also reviewed the cost per resident, per year, that is associated with each
program. Below are the results:
Program Calculation Cost Per Resident/Year
CMSD’s Door-to-Door $23,000/21,816 households $1.05
Permanent HHW Facilities N/A Free
1-Day Event $20,000/21,816 households $0.92*
CR&R’s Services $0.31 X 12 months $3.72
*every other year
In order to legally collect 141,680 pounds of HHW materials, the District would need to
budget for 944 pick-ups, at $98.00 per pick-up, which equates to about $92,500 per
year. Since about 2,530 Costa Mesa residents per year utilize the County’s free HHW collection centers, staff does not recommend expanding the program to all CMSD
residents at this time since it would cost the District over $247,000 per year (2,530
households X $98 = $247,940).
Therefore, staff recommends maintain the status quo and continue to partner with OC Waste & Recycling and Orange Coast College (OCC) to offer 1-day collection events
every other year. CMSD will continue to budget $35,000 per year and only offer these
services to senior citizens, immobile, and/or disabled individuals. $35,000 per year
Board of Directors June 9, 2015
Page 3 of 5
equates to approximately 357 pick-ups per year or 29 pick-ups per month at $98.00
per pick-up. CMSD will continue to partner with OC Waste & Recycling and Orange Coast College (OCC) to offer 1-day collection events every other year.
Alternative options are as follows:
Option 2: Enter into an Agreement with CR&R and pay $0.31 per month per household to allow all CMSD residents to participate twice per year.
Consideration of this option will cost the District an additional $46,200
per year. This calculation is based on the following: $0.31 per household
X 21,816 households = $6,762.96 per month. $6,762.96 per month X 12
months = $81,155.52 per year. $81,155.52 per year - $35,000 (current budget) = $46, 155.52 (additional funds).
Option 3: Amend the current Agreement with CR&R and cap the program at a
certain dollar amount (similar to the Sewer Lateral Assistance Program)
and continue to pay $98.00 per pick-up. Consideration of this option will require the Board of Directors to determine a dollar amount for the
program to be capped at and managed as a first come, first served
program. However, CR&R does not guarantee that they will be able to
track the usage to stay within budget and recommend that CMSD
implement internal administrative policies and procedures to oversee the program to ensure that it stays within budget.
Strategic Plan Element & Goal
This item complies with the objective and strategy of Strategic Element 2.0, Solid
Waste, which states:
“Objective: Our objective is to manage the collection and recycling of residential trash
in the most economical and environmentally friendly way.”
“Strategy: We will do this by looking for ways to improve efficiencies, achieve high
customer satisfaction, and considering prudent new recycling methods.”
Legal Review Not applicable at this time.
Environmental Review
Expanding the District’s program of collecting HHW at individual residences has no adverse impact to the environment from the standpoint of the collection. Residents
are currently required to drive the HHW to a county drop-off point, however, under the
expanded program the District will arrange to have a vehicle do the collecting at the
residence. The difference in total miles driven by residents will not be much different
than by the total miles driven by the collection truck. In fact, by efficiently consolidating all the household collections by the collection truck, the miles driven
could even be lower than if driven separately by each resident. Additionally, the
Board of Directors June 9, 2015
Page 4 of 5
collection keeps the HHW out of the solid waste stream, which prevents pollution of
the environment.
Board of Directors June 9, 2015
Page 5 of 5
Financial Review
The FY 2015-2016 budget includes $40,000 for the existing Door-to-Door HHW
program. Expanding the door-to-door collection program to all CMSD residents would
require an additional appropriation from Retained Earnings causing a further deficit
budget in the Solid Waste Fund. If the Board were to increase rates to cover the additional cost then staff recommends waiting until after FY 2017-18 when the
Wastewater rates increases will need to revisited.
Public Notice Process
Copies of this report are on file and will be included with the complete agenda packet
for the June 9, 2015, Board of Directors Study Session meeting at District
Headquarters and posted on the District’s website.
Alternative Actions
1. Direct staff to report back with more information.
Reviewed by:
Wendy Hooper Davis Finance Manager
Costa Mesa Sanitary District
... an Independent Special District
Organics Ad Hoc Committee Update - Oral Report
Item Number: 7.
Recommendation/Notes:
Recommendation: That the Board of Directors receive an oral report from Secretary Ooten.
Costa Mesa Sanitary District
... an Independent Special District
Project #101 Westside Pump Station Abandonment Design and Engineering Phase –
Oral Report
Item Number: 8.
Recommendation/Notes:
Recommendation: That the Board of Directors consider options for the design and
engineering phase of Project #101 - Westside Pump Station Abandonment.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Project #101 Cover Memo
5/25/15
ROBIN B. HAMERS & ASSOC., INC.
CIVIL ENGINEERShPLANNERShSURVEYORS CMSD #101 WESTSIDE PUMPING STATION ABANDONMENT PROJECT
... since 1981 (PROPOSAL FOR ADMINSTRATIVE SERVICES)
Project Project Total RBH
Manager Engineer Hours Labor Fee
105$ 105$
1.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT
1.1 Project Kick-Off Meeting 3 3 6 630$
1.2 Project Management / Cost Control / Schedule 12 40 52 5,460$
Project Management - Subtotal 15 43 58 6,090$
2.0 SELECTION OF DESIGN CONSULTANT (6 MONTH DURATION)
2.1 Preparation of Request For Qualification (RFQ) and Send to Consultants 4 24 28 2,940$
2.2 Evaluate Consultant Qualification Packages (Assume 10 Firms)20 20 40 4,200$
2.3 Rate Consultants and Select Firms To Receive Request for Proposals (RFP)4 8 12 1,260$
2.4 Preparation of Request For Proposal (RFP) and Send to Consultants 4 24 28 2,940$
2.5 Evaluate Consultant Proposal Packages (Assume 5 Firms)15 15 30 3,150$
2.6 Rate Consultants and Award Design Consultant Contract 4 8 12 1,260$
Selection of Design Consultant - Subtotal 51 99 150 15,750$
3.0 MANAGEMENT OF DESIGN CONSULTANT (18 MONTH DURATION)
3.1 Review / Comment on Contract Documents & Construction Specifications
90% Submittal 4 16 20 2,100$
100% Submittal 4 12 16 1,680$
Final Submitttal 4 4 8 840$
3.2 Review / Comment on Construction Plans
60% Submittal (29 sheets at 2 hours each)12 58 70 7,350$
90% Submittal (29 sheets at 1 hour each)8 29 37 3,885$
100% Submittal (29 sheets at 0.5 hour each)4 15 19 1,943$
Final Submitttal (29 sheets at 0.25 hours each)4 7 11 1,181$
3.3 Review / Comment on Traffic Contol Plans 8 16 24 2,520$
3.4 Review / Comment on Potholing Work (Exhibits, Permits, Detail)4 12 16 1,680$
3.5 Review / Comment on Design Survey (Aerial, Pickup Topo)2 12 14 1,470$
3.6 Review / Comment on Geotechnical Investigation, Recommendations, and Report 4 16 20 2,100$
3.7 Review / Comment on Electrical Design & Coordination For LS Decommisioning 6 20 26 2,730$
3.8 Review / Comment on Easement Preparation (Research, Record Basemaps, Legals)12 12 24 2,520$
3.9 Assistance with EIR / Permitting Coordination 4 4 8 840$
3.10 Meetings; Permitting, Landscape Restoration, etc., Misc.8 66 74 7,770$
Management of Design Consultant - Subtotal 88 299 387 40,609$
154 441 595
16,170$ 46,279$ 62,449$
Scope of Work
Overall Project Total Cost
Overall Project Total Hours
5/25/15
CMSD #101 WESTSIDE PUMPING STATION ABANDONMENT PROJECT
(PROPOSAL FOR ADMINSTRATIVE SERVICES)
Direct Total
Costs Cost
630$
5,460$
-$ 6,090$
500$ 3,440$
4,200$
1,260$
500$ 3,440$
3,150$
1,260$
1,000$ 16,750$
150$ 2,250$
150$ 1,830$
150$ 990$
250$ 7,600$
250$ 4,135$
250$ 2,193$
250$ 1,431$
2,520$
1,680$
1,470$
2,100$
2,730$
2,520$
840$
7,770$
1,450$ 42,059$
2,450$ 64,899$
Costa Mesa Sanitary District
... an Independent Special District
Future Study Session Items
Item Number: 9.
Recommendation/Notes:
Recommendation: That the Board of Directors provide staff with direction on items to be placed on
future study session agendas.
Costa Mesa Sanitary District
... an Independent Special District
ADJOURNMENT
Item Number:
Recommendation/Notes:
THE NEXT STUDY SESSION OF THE COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT BOARD OF
DIRECTORS WILL BE HELD ON TUESDAY, JULY 14, 2015 AT 9:30 A.M. IN THE
DISTRICTS BOARD ROOM, 628 W. 19TH STREET.