Minutes - Board - 2010-04-22COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT
MINUTES OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING
APRIL 22, 2010
CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF
ALLEGIANCE
INVOCATION
ROLL CALL
•
DIRECTORS PRESENT:
DIRECTORS ABSENT:
The Board of Directors of the Costa Mesa
Sanitary District met in regular session on
April 22, 2010 at 5:30 p.m. at 628 W. 19th
Street, Costa Mesa.
Director Ferryman led the Pledge of
Allegiance.
Mr. Fauth gave the invocation.
Arlene Schafer, Robert Ooten, Gary
Monahan, James Ferryman, Art Perry
STAFF PRESENT: Scott Carroll, General Manager; Joan Revak,
Office Manager /Clerk of the District; Robin B.
Hamers, District Engineer; Alan Burns, Legal
Counsel; Tom Fauth, Operations Manager;
Marc Davis, Treasurer; Sherry Kallab,
Administrative Manager
OTHERS PRESENT Shawn Dewane, Director
Mesa Consolidated Water District
Brett R. Barbre, Director
Municipal Water District of Orange County
John Withers, Director
Irvine Ranch Water District
•
r
•
COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT PAGE 2
MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING
HELD APRIL 22, 2010
Susan Trager, Commission Vice Chair
Laguna Beach County Water District.
Charley Wilson, Director
Santa Margarita Water District
ANNOUNCEMENT OF LATE COMMUNICATIONS
Ms. Revak reported there were no late communications received after posting the agenda
and mailing the Board packet.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Director Ferryman moved to approve the Consent Calendar. Director Monahan seconded
the motion. Motion carried 5 -0.
REPORTS
MINUTE APPROVAL
Minutes of Sewer System Committee
Meeting — March 16, 2010
The Minutes of the Sewer System Committee
Meeting of March 16, 2010 were approved as
distributed.
Minutes of Recycling Committee Meeting The Minutes of the Recycling Committee
— March 22, 2010 Meeting of March 22, 2010 were approved as
distributed.
Minutes of the Regular Board of
Directors Meeting — March 25, 2010
Minutes of the Special Meeting — April 7,
2010
Refunds
The Minutes of the Regular Board of Directors
Meeting of March 25, 2010 were approved as
distributed.
The Minutes of the Special Meeting of April 7,
2010 were approved as distributed.
There were no refund requests for the
month of March 2010.
Occupancy Report and Payment of The Trash Occupancy Count documented
$196,795.32 to Costa Mesa Disposal — one increase for the occupancy report for
March 2010 solid waste collection as of April 1, 2010.
Therefore, the total for March is 21,495 and
the payment of $196,795.32 was ratified.
0
•
•
COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT
MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING
HELD APRIL 22, 2010
Monthly Spill Report to State Water
Resources Control Board
Waste Diversion Report for March
2010
Contract Payment of $178,562.61 to
CR Transfer —March 2010
PAGE 3
The Monthly Spill Report to the State Water
Resources Control Board (SWRCB) for April
2010 was accepted as submitted.
The Waste Diversion Report dated March
2010 was accepted as submitted.
The contract payment of $178,562.61 to
CR Transfer for recycling services and
disposal for the month of March 2010 was
ratified as submitted.
Contract Payment of $10,733.30
The contract payment of $10,733.30 to CR
to CR Transfer - Santa Ana
Transfer for recycling services and disposal
Heights /Newport Beach — March 2010
for Santa Ana Heights /Newport Beach for
the month of March 2010 was ratified as
submitted.
Ordinance Enforcement Officer's
The Ordinance Enforcement Officer's Report
Report
dated April 12, 2010 was accepted as
submitted.
ENGINEER'S REPORTS
Project Status Report
The Project Status Report dated April 2010
was accepted as submitted.
Howard S. Wright Contractors Invoice The Howard S. Wright Invoice for work
in the amount of $321,722.88 performed through March 31, 2010 in the
amount of $321,722.88 was ratified as
submitted.
TREASURER'S REPORTS
Financial Report as of March 31,
2010
Treasurer's Report as of March 31,
2010
The Financial Report as of March 31, 2010
was accepted as submitted.
The Treasurer's Report as of March 31, 2010
was accepted as submitted.
•
•
•
COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT PAGE 4
MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING
HELD APRIL 22, 2010
Warrant Register for the month of Warrant Resolution #CMSD 2010 -10 was
March 2010 in the amount of approved, authorizing the President and
$1,027,898.42 Secretary to sign the warrant ratifying the
payment of certain claims and demands, and
specifying the funds out of which the same
were paid in the amount of $1,027,898.42.
Directors Compensation &
Reimbursement of Expenses for the
month of March 2010.
Director Compensation and Expense
Reimbursements for the month of March
2010 were approved and ratified as follows:
President Schafer: $1,326.00 + $22.00
Vice President Ooten: $1,326.00 + $47.00
Director Monahan: $442.00
Director Ferryman: $1,326.00 + $12.00
Director Perry: $884.00
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
President Schafer motioned to consider a non - agenda item because the need arose after
posting of the agenda. Director Monahan seconded the motion. Motion carried 5 -0
PUBLIC COMMENTS
President Schafer acknowledged the public and noted they were in attendance to present
comments on Item XV.D.1. of the agenda. President Schafer stated after the March 25,
2010 Board of Directors meeting where Mr. Freschi and Mr. Dewane spoke, she realized
the Board of Directors should have offered time for Mr. John Withers and Mr. Charley
Wilson to address the Board. District Counsel Alan Burns stated there was a question as
to whether an item could be reconsidered and as the item is properly noted on the
agenda, and in compliance with the Brown Act, the Board can legally reconsider the item.
Mr. Withers of the Irvine Ranch Water District and the ISDOC representative to LAFCO
expressed his appreciation to the CMSD Board of Directors to allow him to speak and
stated he has served on LAFCO for 16 years since Special Districts were seated and
continues to serve as he is passionate about Special District form of government and
believes we are the ones closest to the people and are very focused on the role he plays
in serving special districts. Mr. Withers stated he is an elected official on the Irvine Ranch
Water District and has served for twenty one years. More recently became a member of
the Board of the Orange County Sanitation District and very proud of the assignment he
has there. After only six months he is serving on the Steering Committee and Vice
Chairman on the Administrative and Finance Committee and he thinks it is in recognition
of his experience and the fact he is enthusiastic about whatever he undertakes. Mr.
Withers also serves on the National Water Research Institute Board and does not have
ambitions for higher office. "I really like what I do and I am proud that I have been
COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT PAGE 5
MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING
HELD APRIL 22, 2010
endorsed by a number of LAFCO colleagues. Supervisor Bill Campbell said to me, `I
don't agree with you on all the issues, but I am endorsing you and Charley because I
think you have done a great job.' Peter Hertzog, President of LAFCO and Susan Wilson
both endorse me and to be represented by colleagues is meaningful to me and I take a
special pride in that. We have letters from Congressmen, Gary Miller, Ken Calvert, and
State Senator Tom Harmon and I think anyone can do that but I don't know that they
know that much about LAFCO. It's the 27 special districts that are very aware of LAFCO
that we care most about. I am proud of the fact that some of the smallest support our
candidacy and I am real proud of the fact that the Capistrano Bay Community Services
District, Three Arch Bay Community Services District, Emerald Bay, Sunset Beach
Sanitary District, Surfside Storm Water Protection, Surfside CSD, Rossmoor /Los Alamitos
Sanitary District are all endorsing our candidacy. The key thing about LAFCO is you have
to count to four. You need four votes to get something done or you need four votes to
prevent something from getting done. Because I've been there so long and am really a
resource, people will say, John, what do you think? We have been very effective in
reaching out. The key is making the bridge to the county members, the public member
and putting the coalition together. I tell people I am the middle of five kids and that's true
and had to work with my brothers and sisters and kind of a compromiser and that serves
me well on LAFCO. I am very proud of some of the work we have done. Another issue at
LAFCO is the municipal service review process and it is required by state law that every
five years must do one and I am real proud of the fact we have turned it around 180
degrees. It used to be we would worry about what LAFCO will come up with and slam
something on us. That has changed completely. LAFCO is now more of a resource and
the emphasis is on local people to develop things they want to do and bring it up to
LAFCO. I am real proud of the progress we have made to that extent. Also in running
our LAFCO staff in the last two years we have reduced our budget by 15% the last two
years and this year's proposed budget has no increase. We run it like a business and are
mindful of the resources we all pay and it is based on gross revenue of the budget, size of
the district on a sliding scale and we are real proud of that.
On the MWDOC issue, I have been reelected to LAFCO four times, it has never been an
issue. No one has ever said I have not been responsive. This year we did have a big
issue with this whole north /south county, to split up MWDOC. I have never felt that was a
good idea. I don't think the benefits outweigh the costs and all the distractions and quite
frankly delude our effectiveness as a county. I am very happy to report about ten days
ago — I give MWDOC credit — they reached out to the south county people and made
some additional concessions, presented a package to south county and all the south
county agencies have all ratified the frame work for settling this. I understand there were
a couple of issues raised for clarification. I understand the general manager talking. My
own district has ratified the framework for settlement by a unanimous vote. We wanted to
lead by example. This thing has been going on for about three years and everybody
knows we've spent way too much money and time on this thing. I took the view that
because I am on LAFCO I really should stay out of the negotiations, I didn't want to be
�. biased. In looking back on that, maybe I should have gotten involved earlier — maybe it
could have been solved earlier. I am proud of the fact this thing is 90% of the way there.
0
COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT PAGE 6
MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING
HELD APRIL 22, 2010
It is imminently resolvable and I know from my own district and others we are committed
to making it work and being problem solvers. I brought a copy of the south county letter if
you would like to see it.
I think this is why there is a campaign. You probably have received lots of calls, from
congressmen and others. My hope is that we can get this thing settled and get on to the
work before us. I would just say in closing, of all the Boards I serve on, I think I like
LAFCO the best just because of the challenges it presents — people from all walks of life —
big districts, small districts - trying to do the best for their community, people down in
Coto, south county, people trying to figure how they are going to govern their cities. It
means a lot that I continue to work on this thing, I am very dedicated and passionate
about it, I try to be very honest, transparent and accessible to people. I will continue to be
that way. I believe Arlene Schafer and I have a great relationship on LAFCO — we have
worked very close on different issues. I have worked with Director Ferryman at OCSD
and I think we have a great relationship. I know there have been times where there have
been issues between IRWD and the San District and I know there were one where there
was some conflict and Director Ferryman called and said to me, `this is nuts, let's get it
solved' and I said `you are right' and we brought people together and that's the kind of
guy I am and what you see is what you get. I have been called all kinds of things in this
campaign and it's really too bad, but I believe let's take the high road. I believe in being
positive and talking about my experience and the accomplishments of LAFCO. We have
great staff. I respectfully ask for your support, it would mean a lot to me. I'll try to
continue the good work I have done and I very much appreciate your time and attention.
If there are any questions, l would be happy to answer and questions you might have.
You may or may not know there was a piece of legislation called the " Gotch" bill by
Assemblyman Mike Gotch .back in 1992 that reformed LAFCOs and gave LAFCOs new
powers to consolidate like -kind agencies and special districts. The trade -off was that if
LAFCO was going to have these powers, special districts should have a seat at the table.
I originally ran as the alternate on LAFCO and have been there ever since, reelected four
times and never been challenged. This year because of other issues it has gotten very
political. I am not a vindictive guy, win, lose or draw I will continue to do good work."
Director Monahan asked if Mr. Withers was involved in the Santa Ana Heights and Irvine
Ranch Water District dispute of a few years ago, was it a LAFCO issue. Mr. Withers
replied, "Santa Ana Heights was a private, mutual water company and for whatever
reason they decided to go out of business and went to auction of their private shares and
actually, I think all of us, Irvine Ranch, Mesa Consolidated and the public...... the big
competition at the time were the private water companies were all bidding like sharks in
the water, and we decided at IRWD that it got down to a matter of economics and what
people were willing to pay. In the end our district paid about $1100 per share and you
owned a share by virtue of owning a fee piece of property. In the end it was a bid and
again, you can look back on history and what did and didn't happen, people were
accused of different things. I do know that Susan Trager, who is here tonight, was
actually the attorney for the Santa Ana Heights Mutual Water Company. On the
transparency Issue, my District has been Involved in several consolidations and I have
always felt it was not fair for me to participate in those issues. On every consolidations
•
COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT PAGE 7
MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING
HELD APRIL 22, 2010
our District has been involved I have recused myself on every vote because I did not think
it was the right thing to do. It is something that goes back ten years and you can check
the record and I've been very consistent on it. Thank you very much."
President Schafer asked if Mr. Wilson would like to speak.
Mr. Wilson stated "I have had the privilege of serving as the special district alternate for
the past eight years. I came into LAFCO in 2002. My home base is an elected board
member of the Santa Margarita Water District that has its own history in a private
takeover attempt, which is what brought me into the water business when a hostile
takeover was attempted. I have also 15 years of working experience in Costa Mesa back
when John Seymour when he represented the area. The work I did in my current
capacity working for the electric utility with Southern California Edison where I served as
your liaison for a number of years. For a long time I hosted your local public access
television show and many of you were guests on the show. I actually know Costa Mesa
more than a lot of city communities I've lived in over the years. I appreciate being able to
come here and talk to you and present my qualifications. As I see it the LAFCO issue
without covering the stuff John covered, is about background and my background is well
established and I am in the utility business and understand the utility business. As with
John, I am not interested to run for higher office and am not interested in using this as a
• platform to run for higher office. This is not a place where you make a lot of friends but
that is part of the challenge. Because I am an expert in utility kinds of things it.is a place
where I find where I can best contribute to local government in Orange County. It is about
expertise — the Cortese -Knox- Hertzberg Act is not a simple Act. It is not something that
you want on the job training. It.takes a long time to understand it and how it works and
how it applies to special districts. I have that expertise after eight years of service. It is
about experience. You get that experience by actually sitting at the dias and although I
serve as your alternate member, one of the great things about serving as an alternate in
Orange County is unlike other boards where they don't even allow you to sit at the dias
and kind of put you off in another room. Alternates in this case have all rights and
activities up until the vote and I vote only if John or Arlene are not in attendance. I have
the knowledge and ability to still have an impact because of the way they allow active
participation and I have used that, according to Joyce, I have the best attendance of all
the commissioners, both seated and alternates and I take this very seriously in my
obligation to represent special districts. It's about relationships; you have to be able to
work with city members, county members, public members, you've got to be able to have
your views heard and understand so that an informed choice can be made. That is what
LAFCO is about. Anyone who wants to come into LAFCO with a pre- determined outcome
is very badly mistaken. On one day you will have agreements, on another you will have
disagreements. As John Campbell said, `you guys deserve to be there the way you
conduct yourselves is appropriate and I support you being there and continuing your
service'. Peter Hertzberg said basically the same thing. I went through a very difficult
period with an MSR with the El Toro Water District. Peter thought Lake Forest ought to
have El Toro as they were neat lines on the map. Peter now understands that neat lines
on a map have nothing to do with hydraulics and how water districts operate. He now
•
COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT PAGE 8
MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING
FIELD APRIL 22, 2010
understands as we have a relationship in which he was willing and able to listen and we
were effective in that. Relationships become very, very important as you go forward and
your effectiveness. We have been very effective as your team, literally with the three
members in this room as your special district representation. El Toro exists today
because of our effectiveness, Emerald Bay exists today because of our effectiveness
when Laguna Beach wanted to take them over. Sunset Beach exists today because of
our effectiveness when the city of Huntington Beach wanted to take them over. Many
special districts exist today because of how we have conducted ourselves in
understanding the needs of special districts. So, thank you for allowing us to speak. We
would love for you to reconsider the position you currently have now that you have had an
opportunity to hear from us and understand what is really at stake in this. You are looking
for open, effective, honest, transparent, fiscally prudent representative that is highly
effective. I believe we are the clear choice and we thank you and ask for your support.
Thank you."
President Schafer asked if there were any questions. Shawn Dewane stated he would
like to speak.
Mr. Dewane stated "I got involved in this as I have a personal philosophy that I am
generally opposed to the concept of centralized planning and the sense I got as Mesa
went through our MSR process that there was an effort at the state level to urge away all
of the independent special. districts. I am in the capital markets business for a living and
we talk about a concept called `moral hazard' which means we who are involved in
investing peoples' money need to be keep in mind where the risk is and where the risk
transfer is -and what it really comes down to when making an investment you have to be
dealing across the table with someone you know, and as Mr. Wilson correctly pointed out
this is all about relationships. The relationship that I believe counts most is the
relationship between the people who live in the communities and the governing bodies
that govern those communities. Independent Special Districts that provide single service
provide the most accountability. I believe government skills best when it skills laterally
across the communities and not vertically, centralizing the planning in one centralized
decision - making body. John and Charley both correctly point out that LAFCO is a very
powerful body and they only count to four, and what troubles me about that process is
that there are then four people who govern the lives of many people who have no say in
the vote as to whether or not those LAFCO commissioners are appointed. The people
who vote to elect us, the Special Districts, perhaps have an intermediate say all the way
up to LAFCO but the effect on the map on your wall is tremendous when you consider
four people have the say as to whether or not. Mesa serves the water, whether or not the
Sanitary District stands on its own, whether or not the revenues we generate from the
sale of water go to subsidize the public safety budget that the City and all kinds of other
issues that then become impossible to separate from each other, impossible to make a
comparison; for the competitiveness of the water rate, the competitiveness of the salaries,
the job training, job opportunities, the abilities of governing bodies, the people who serve
• in our positions to have the training and expertise to carryon in the future.
COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT PAGE 9
MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING
HELD APRIL 22, 2010
Those opportunities begin to exist and all of a sudden we are left with a few centralized
decision - makers who then control the outcomes of all of the lives of us in the county and
in the cities we live in. It is the individual ability, the self- determination that the individual
liberties we have to be able to come into this Board room and into Mesa's Board room
and our Chairman across the desk is with us specifically about the water issues;
specifically with you about the Sanitary District issues. It doesn't work well when you
come in and try to parse apart your conversation — you are doing sanitation — you are
doing water issues, and who do I really talk to. There is nobody who is accountable and
that is where who do I really talk to. If we use history as any example, history is littered
with examples of failed bureaucracies that relied on centralized planning to make their
decisions about the resources on which we live.
That is the perspective. If elected to the LAFCO Commission, I would like to say one
additional thing as there have been rumors circulating and one rumor is that I am doing
this to further the ambition of Mesa to take over the Sanitary District and I would like the
record to accurately reflect that is not my motive and that is not my purpose or ambition of
Mesa to take over the Sanitary District. I would work with you to further strengthen the
independence of this District and not to merge it with Mesa or any other city. So, thank
you very much."
• President Schafer asked if anyone else cared to address the Board. Susan Trager, a
Commission' er of the Laguna Beach County Water District stated she would like to
communicate to you if it is permissible, the support of the Laguna Beach County Water
District, which is the city council for the reelection and return of Charley Wilson and John
Withers to the LAFCO Board. I have been around the county for a very long time, since
the 70's, with water issues, sewer issues, a lot of LAFCO issues and land use issues. I
have a sense of what goes on here. I am here today because I am very troubled by some
of the comments I read that Brett Barbre communicated on the March 25, 2010 meeting
here. I think the astonishing extortion of what actually occurred in the Santa Ana Heights
decision to sell itself and go out of business. He described it inaccurately, was not there,
and. neither of the candidates challenging Mr. Withers and Mr. Wilson were there. They
weren't even involved much in water or anything sanitary at the time. I was the lawyer for
Santa Ana Heights. It was assumed for a long time they would be taken over by Mesa
Consolidated. There was a dust off between the long -time engineer of the Heights and
Mesa and he went back to the Board and said we really need to do this a different way.
The Board decided it was going to hold an auction and instructed the lawyers, I was one
of them, to make a list of suitable invitees to the auction. At the time there was a lot of
push as has been represented by Mr. Withers. They made a list, sent out invitations, the
bids came in. It took a longtime because the bids were very thoughtful and there was a
lot of appraisal. The Board members thought it would be best for the shareholders to
uphold their fiduciary obligations to the shareholders to get the highest price for the
shares as possible. IRWD came in with the highest bid and there was an immense
amount of litigation. Mesa was a sore loser — Mesa Consolidated Water District — this
community paid dearly for the legal representation and cost and probably 3, 4, 5
proceedings and a lot of litigation to try stop and put aside the sale and try to unravel it.
•
COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT PAGE 10
MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING
HELD APRIL 22, 2010
A lot of hard feelings, the losing lawyers were still angry. My firm handled a lot of litigation
that was involved and ultimately prevailed. The Santa Ana Heights was taken over and
dissolved by the Irvine Ranch Water District and both the directors and the majority of the
shareholders were pretty happy with it. That is what happened. Not part of a main,
horrible scheme of the Irvine Ranch Water District to take over the world. That was not
an unwilling seller. They wanted to take it over, they couldn't raise the capital to modify
their - - the equipment for the redevelopment that was going on in their service area. So
they needed to do something radical so that everybody got service and that is what
happened. I was there I was a witness. Contrary to what was said at the meeting by Mr.
Barbre - that is not what happened and I wanted the opportunity to say that and I really
hope you have it in you to change your vote and to reelect people who are experienced
on LAFCO. You don't want on- the -job training and I hope you will do that. Thank you
very much."
President expressed her appreciation for the explanation by Ms. Trager.
Director Ferryman moved to rescind the former motion of the March 25, 2010 meeting
and consider voting again. Director Ooten seconded the motion. Motion carried 4 -1.
• Director Ferryman moved for the District to support Charley Wilson and John Withers as
our representatives to LAFCO. President Schafer seconded the motion and asked for
discussion. Director Monahan stated he would not be supporting the motion and stated it
has nothing to do with the two gentlemen he is not supporting and thanked Mr. Wilson
and Mr. Withers for their many, many years of very good service. Director Monahan
stated at this point in time and with everything going on with LAFCO and the way things
are going he is really impressed with the fact we could have some local representation
with Mr. Freschi and Mr. Dewane. Director Monahan said he supports Mr. Freschi and
Mr. Dewane as they are local and the District would have a bigger voice at LAFCO and
much more personal attention. Motion carried 4 -1.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
Ms. Revak reported there were no written communications.
MANAGER'S REPORTS
Mr. Carroll requested consideration of an Issue arose after the agenda was posted and
there is a need to take immediate action as this item is needed to meet the budget
schedule. Director Monahan moved to include this item regarding a fleet maintenance
agreement. Director Perry seconded the motion. Motion carried 5 -0. Director Monahan
addressed Legal Counsel Alan Burns on whether it would be a conflict of interest to vote
on this issue as Director Monahan serves on the City Council of Costa Mesa. Mr. Burns
stated there was not a conflict of interest as Mr. Monahan was elected to serve both
entities.
•
COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT PAGE 11
'MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING
HELD APRIL 22, 2010
Mr. Carroll presented two options to the Board of Directors to lower the District's fleet
maintenance cost with a contract with the City of Costa Mesa (CCM) or the City of
Newport Beach. The difference is the labor rate with Costa Mesa being $96.52 and
Newport Beach a rate of $75.00. The current contractor, Nextruck charges $110 an hour.
Mr. Hamers stated on many occasions the CMSD has attempted to work on projects with
the City of Costa Mesa, however, in the past the City has not presented a favorable rate
for the services required. The current contract with Nextruck states either party can
request a dissolution of the agreement given 10 days notice. Director Monahan
suggested meeting with City of Costa Mesa personnel and offering the agreement to the
City if they can meet the $75.00 an hour rate. The Board of Directors gave direction to
Mr. Carroll to contact the. Assistant City Manager at the CCM in an attempt to lower the
rate to $75.00 an hour. If the CCM agrees, Mr. Carroll was given direction to negotiate an
agreement with the CCM. If the CCM does not match the Newport Beach labor rate, Mr.
Carroll is authorized to negotiate a contract with the City of Newport Beach.
Mr. Carroll requested the agenda item under Treasurer's Reports, the Plan Check,
Inspection, Permit and Annexation Charges be considered at this time as Director Perry
must leave the meeting at 6:30 p.m.
• Director Ferryman moved to adopt CMSD Ordinance No. 75, Revising the Plan Check,
Inspection, Permit & Annexation Fee Provisions of the District Operations Code. Director
Monahan seconded the motion. Motion carried 5 -0.
Mr. Davis presented an analysis of a comprehensive user fee study in order to calculate
the full cost of providing specific sewer - related services to the public. The study will serve
as the basis for setting updated or new user fees for plan check, inspection, permit and
annexation services. The District's user fees were last updated by Resolution 94 -556,
adopted in July 1994. Mr. Davis presented the scope, methodology and results of the
study and Mr. Carroll noted the study and report were provided to the Building Industry
Association (BIA) for their review and comment and, to date, the District has not received
any comments from the BIA nor is a representative here tonight.
Mr. Davis noted the results of the study noting all existing fees are recommended to be
adjusted to recover the full cost of providing the service. Additionally, the fee for
construction of new facilities is recommended to be set at $10.00 a linear foot and capped
at $20,000. This fee was determined after the results of an analysis that found the
average plan check and inspection cost for the last five tract developments in the District
was $1,360 per 100 linear foot.
Mr. Davis also reported Staff currently performs services for which there is no existing fee
and recommends user fees be established for small new developments, swimming pool
connection, minor on -site plumbing work, large new developments and cap lateral and
demolition. Mr. Davis noted using the average units performed, adoption of the
recommended fees will result in an increase in annual revenue to the Liquid Waste Fund
in the amount of $24,292.
0
COSTA.MESA SANITARY DISTRICT PAGE 12
MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING
FIELD APRIL 22, 2010
Director Perry left the meeting at 6:30 p.m.
Director Ooten moved for adoption of CMSD Resolution No. 2010 -777, Establishing Plan
Check, Inspection, Permit and Annexation Fees, with a review every three years. Further
discussion on the study ensued. Director Monahan seconded the motion. Motion carried
4 -0.
MANAGER'S REPORTS (CONTINUED)
STERICYCLE
Mr. Carroll presented a summary of the program with Stericycle to pick up and dispose of
used hypodermic needles at local pharmacies. Several years ago, the District and
Stericycle were at odds over the agreement between both agencies to continue to provide
the services and District Staff refused to sign the Stericycle standard form of agreement.
Options were presented to the Board:
1. Continue status quo by paying Stericycle invoices. Instruct Steven's and White
Front Pharmacies that when the contracts expire do not sign any extensions,
• amendments and /or new agreements with Stericycle. Direct staff to solicit bids
from other vendors who are qualified to perform a Sharps program.
2. Pay Stericycle the costs for terminating the contracts with Stevens and White
Front Pharmacies and direct staff to solicit bids from other vendors who are
qualified to perform a Sharps program.
3. Direct Staff to coordinate a cease and desist of services between Stericycle
and Stevens and White Front Pharmacies, discontinue paying Stericycle
invoices and solicit bids from other vendors who are qualified to perform a
Sharps Program. Stevens and White Front may decide to discontinue offering
their stores at a drop -off site in which case the District would have to find other
pharmacies who are willing to participate in the program. Stevens and White
Front will be responsible for paying any outstanding balances. Currently, _
Stevens outstanding balance to Stericycle is $802.35 and White Front
outstanding balance is $951.86.
Director Monahan moved to select option 3, as proposed by District Staff. President
Schafer seconded the motion.
Director Ooten stated his belief that Staff committed to this program, was well aware of
the costs associated with the program, and funds have been budgeted. Director Ooten
expressed the opinion that the District has funds to pay Stericycle and believes Staff did
not follow -up on the program and it is remiss of Staff not knowing that these pharmacies
were signing the agreements with Stericycle. Director Ooten stated there is no risk
involved in person's getting pricked. Director Ooten noted the District has a commitment
COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT PAGE 13
MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING
HELD APRIL 22, 2010
•
to the community for this program; there have been discussions about expanding the
program, and he is not in favor of concluding payment to Stericycle. Mr. Carroll stated he
believes it is not good business practice to offer a service without an agreement and if the
Board is agreeable to continue and when the agreement with Stevens and White Front
expires, Staff can then negotiate their own contract. Director Ooten stated he is
concerned that Staff just became aware of the situation. Director Ferryman suggested
Staff go to the pharmacies and explain the program and that the District does not have
signed agreements with Stericycle.
Mr. Fauth stated Stericycle went behind the District's back with the pharmacies and
insured the Board CMSD Staff did not know about it.
Mr. Burns stated he did agree the District should not continue to pay when the contract is
between two private parties as that may be a gift of public funds issue and secondly, as
Mr. Carroll reported we cannot encourage them to terminate their contract but we can say
"we are not going to pay any longer — you (Stericycle) signed the contract with the
pharmacies and didn't ask us about and if you want to contact us later, we will be happy
to talk about it."
Mr. Carroll stated Staff is not in favor of terminating the Sharps program but basically
wants to tie up some loose ends.
Director Ooten made a motion for the District to continue to pay Stericycle until and
unless an alternative option is available. The substitute motion is that the CMSD continue
to serve the public by paying Stericycle until and unless an alternative is found. Madame
President stated the substitute motion died for lack of a second.
President Schafer asked for a vote on the first motion. Motion carried as follows:
Ayes:
Arlene Schafer, Gary Monahan, James Ferryman
Noes:
Robert Ooten
Absent:
Arthur Perry
LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR ASSEMBLY BILL 2407
Mr. Carroll reported on Assembly Bill 2407. Currently, south Orange County cities are
under the jurisdiction of the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board. The
proposed legislation would realign the San Diego and Santa Ana Regional Water Quality
Control Board boundaries to allow the south Orange County cities to be under the Santa
Ana regional jurisdiction. Director Ferryman moved to approve the letter of support for AB
2407 and direct Staff to mail said letter to the author of the Bill and to the District's state
legislators. Director Ooten seconded the motion. Motion carried 4 -0.
•
COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT PAGE 14
MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING
HELD APRIL 22, 2010
LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR ASSEMBLY BILL 2182
Mr. Carroll reported on Assembly Bill 2182. The Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) and
the North Bay Watershed Association (NBWA) are co- sponsoring a bill from Assembly
member Jared Huffman (6t" District) that will allow public agencies to fund private septic
to sewer conversions and lateral replacements. Staff believes this bill, if passed, could
benefit the District and is recommending the Board of Directors support this bill by
sending a letter of support to the bill's author and to the District's state representatives,
Senator Harman and Assemblyman Van Tran. Director Ooten moved to approve the
letter of support for AB 2182 and direct Staff to mail said letter to the bill's author and to
the District's state legislators. Director Monahan seconded the motion. Motion carried
4 -0;
RECYCLING COMMITTEE -MONDAY, APRIL 19, 2010
Director Ooten reported on the Recycling Committee meeting held April 19, 2010.
President Schafer attended the meeting in place of Director Perry. One of the items
discussed was a change in contractor to assist in the composting program. Mr. Patrick
McNelly is no longer available to work with the CMSD. The services of Ms. Francine
Kaplan will be utilized. Ms. Kaplan has a good background and will assist Mr. Fauth in
developing the use of County funds. Discussion was held on the use of Styrofoam
containers.
Director Ooten reported discussion was held on the purchase of earth machines for
distribution to CMSD residents. Mr. Fauth advised the Committee the 2008 -2009 Grant
does not include earth machines for distribution to CMSD residents, only schools. The
Board of Directors must decide if they wish to continue with the residential program and, if
so, plan for this additional expenditure in the budget.
Ms. Revak reported on three field trips scheduled for tours of the materials recovery
facility at CR &R and the Frank R. Bowerman Landfill for students from Estancia High
School, California Elementary and College Park Elementary.
The Recycling Committee Goals will be integrated into the CMSD Strategic Plan.
ENGINEER'S REPORTS
PROJECT #171 IRVINE PUMPING STATION FORCE MAIN REHABILITATION
Mr. Hamers presented a report on Project #171 Irvine Pumping Station Force Main
Rehabilitation summary of the District' Inflow Reduction Program. Staff determined the
Irvine Pumping Station force main is the.number one CMSD force main candidate for
rehabilitation or replacement based on its history and operating conditions as further
described.
•
COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT PAGE 15
MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING
HELD APRIL 22, 2010
Mr. Hamers explained the 2005 Sewer Master Plan identified a force main replacement
program as an important element in eliminating sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs). Force
mains are the pressure sewer lines from the low -lying pumping stations to the outlet
manholes located at a higher grade. The CMSD has 20 pumping stations and therefore,
20 force mains.
Because force mains operate under pressure, breaks in force mains are similar to breaks
in water lines where water is gushing out at high volumes. Because flows in force mains
are so high, SSOs from breaks in force mains result in large spill volumes. For instance,
should a five minute spill occur from a break in the Irvine pumping station force main, the
spill would total 5 min x 1,500 gal /min = 7,500 gallons. This volume is far above a typical
gravity sewer spill volume. Therefore, agencies should conclude force main rehabilitation
is a priority.
Mr. Hamers stated further, force main condition assessment is at this point in time an
inexact science, meaning there is no current method to determine the structural integrity
of the entire line. What is needed is a new technology consisting of a no -dig method of
introducing a probe in the line from the outlet manhole all the way down the line while it
measures the pipe wall thickness.
Even though new technology is approaching this ability, it is believed the Irvine Pumping
Station force main is ready for rehabilitation or replacement. Mr. Hamers presented a
condition assessment of the existing force main, a limitations of condition assessment,
rehabilitation options considered and .resources investigated. Mr. Hamers noted Staff is
currently arranging with lining manufacturers and pipeline contractors to assess the
rehabilitation /replacement methods, practicalities and costs, after which Engineer's
Estimates of the options will be prepared.
The Sewer System Committee will review this item at the May or June 2010 Committee
meeting.
SEWER SYSTEM COMMITTEE
Director Monahan reported on the Sewer System Committee meeting held on April 13,
2010.
There were no sewer spills in the last month. Several items and updates on projects
were discussed. The Santa Margarita Water District Force Main spill was discussed.
Asset Management was discussed. Mr. Carroll and Mr. Fauth attended a workshop on
the subject and gave a brief report. There were updates on all CMSD projects. A CCTV
vehicle demonstration was presented.
The next meeting of the Sewer System Committee will be held on May 18, 2010 at
10:30 a.m.
COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT PAGE 16
MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING
HELD APRIL 22, 2010
•
TREASURER'S REPORTS
The Treasurer's Reports were addressed earlier in the meeting.
ATTORNEY'S REPORTS
Claim by Back Bay, Ltd. For Property at 2651 -1675 Irvine Avenue
(CMSD Project #168 — Irvine Pump Station Relocation)
Mr. Burns reported he may have been overly optimistic in his earlier report on the
progress on this case. The parties are still far apart in coming to an agreement.
Mr. Burns will continue to monitor the progress and report to the Board of
Directors.
Adoption of on Ordinance Enacting an Administrative Citation Imposing Civil
Fines for Violations of District Ordinances
Mr. Burns presented for the Board's consideration, a draft ordinance enacting an
administrative citation system for the District's Operations Code. This ordinance
allows a code violation to be prosecuted civilly. Because violations would be civil,
the offender would not be subjected to criminal sanctions. Staff would still have
discretion to cite violations as criminal offenses when appropriate.
Mr. Burns recommends the Board of Directors provide input on the subject and
direct Staff to bring back for approval consideration a final draft version of an
ordinance that will enact an administrative citation system.
LOCAL MEETINGS
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT (OCSD)
Director Ferryman reported at the Groundwater Replenishment meeting. Director
Ferryman reported OCSD finally came to an agreement with IRWD on a Solids
Agreement transferring IRWD solids to the OCSD Wastewater System and
reimbursing OCSD for its costs, in a form approved by General Counsel.
SANTA ANA RIVER FLOOD PROTECTION AGENCY (SARFPA)
Director Ferryman stated a meeting of the Santa Ana River Flood Protection
Agency was not held this month.
•
COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT PAGE 17
MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING
HELD APRIL 22, 2010
INDEPENDENT SPECIAL DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY ( ISDOC)
President Schafer reported on the ISDOC Board meeting held on April 6, 2010. A
legislative report was given. There was discussion on the two seats up for election
as ISDOC representative to LAFCO. Discussion was held on potential
programs /speakers for the July 29, 2010 quarterly meeting. There was also
discussion on ISDOC's role for the CSDA Annual Conference. It was agreed
ISDOC will host the 1 st Welcome Reception with others from Orange County co-
hosting part of the reception.
LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMITTEE ( LAFCO)
President Schafer reported on the LAFCO meeting held on April 14, 2010; a public
hearing on the proposed LAFCO budget for Fiscal Year 2010 -2011. Proposed
Latent Powers Activation for Three Arch Bay Community Services District was
continued until May. LAFCO is working on 2010 Unincorporated Islands handbook
and more data is needed. A County boundary update was presented.
ORANGE COUNTY COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
President Schafer attended a meeting of OCCOG today at OCTA. Discussion was
held on an OCTA and OCCOG joint meeting. Membership in OCCOG was
discussed. There are 38 members out of 40 who have responded. Dues are
$5,000. ISDOC is a holdout as each Board must report and vote to be a member.
They are also awaiting a response from San Juan Capistrano.
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
President Schafer attended the April 7, 2010 meeting of the Chamber of
Commerce. Reports were given by representatives of several entities,
including updates on Bills and information.
CALIFORNIA SPECIAL DISTRICTS ASSOCIATION (CSDA)
President Schafer attended meetings in Sacramento on April 10, April 16 and is
flying to Sacramento on April 23, 2010. They included meetings of the Legislative
Committee, an Ad Hoc Committee evaluating the General Manager, the Education
Committee and Educational workshops being held in conjunction with the CSDA
Annual Conference in Newport Beach.
1, CMSD RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -778 NOMINATING ARLENE SCHAFER TO
REPRESENT THE CSDA FOR REGION 6, SEAT B.
Director Ferryman moved to approve CMSD Resolution No. 2010 -778
Nominating Arlene Schafer to Represent the CSDA for Region 6, Seat B.
Director Ooten seconded the motion. Motion carried 4 -0.
COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT PAGE 18
MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING
HELD APRIL 22, 2010
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF SANITATION AGENCIES (CASA)
The CASA Spring Conference is being held at the Newport Beach Marriott Hotel
April 28 -30, 2010. President Schafer, Director Ferryman and General Manager
Scott Carroll will attend on Wednesday, April 28 and Friday, April 30, 2010;
Director Perry will attend on Friday, April 30, 2010; and Director Ooten will attend
on Wednesday, April 28, 2010.
OLD BUSINESS
PRESENTATION OF PLAQUE FROM THE CMSD HONORING ED FAWCETT, COSTA MESA
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, AT MESA VERDE GOLF CLASSIC ON APRIL 19, 2010.
Director Ferryman reported on the April 19, 2010 Mesa Verde Golf Classic held to
raise money for Costa Mesa youth sports through Costa Mesa United. Mr. Ed
Fawcett, CEO of the Chamber of Commerce was honored for his longstanding
work to better our community. In recognition of Ed's outstanding, dedicated
service and leadership to the City of Costa Mesa, Director Ferryman presented a
plaque to honor Mr. Fawcett on behalf of the Costa Mesa Sanitary District.
• NEW BUSINESS
There was no new business to report.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS AND DIRECTOR COMMENTS
Mr. Hamers reported the CMSD Maintenance Yard should be completed by the end of
May or early June 2010. The City of Costa Mesa received federal stimulus funds to re-
pave Wilson Street and that allows the CMSD to save money by not having to engage the
contractor to put in the drive approach and sidewalk. However, the City work won't be
completed until some time after the Yard is done. President Schafer stated an Open
House at the Yard is planned for fall 2010.
Director Ooten reported attending the WDR Steering Committee meeting and heard about
developing new means of measuring SSOs and everybody believes it should be changed.
There was an update on the Santa Margarita spill.
Director Monahan provided an update on the idea of one franchise trash hauler for the
City of Costa Mesa.
Director Monahan also reported hearing that Poseidon was approved in the City of
Huntington Beach and requested General Manager Scott Carroll to investigate and report
back to the Board.
0
•
COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT PAGE 19
MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING
HELD APRIL 22, 2010
Director Monahan also reported hearing OCTA did approve the study on the end of the 55
freeway, in other words where the 55 meets 19th Street. They are going to study four
different options on going down to about 15th Street. At this point in time, the public
favorite and the engineer's favorite is what they call "cut and cover' so they tunnel
underneath downtown, and there would be a really nice downtown with through traffic
going straight through.
Director Monahan reported City Council did expand by one hour on the 4th of July until
9:00 p.m. instead of 8:00 p.m. the mandatory closing of the fireworks stands. The City
also omitted the ban on handhelds which are the new form of sparklers, not the metal
ones, they are called "morning glories" and they are a wooden or bamboo material and
they are incredibly safe sparklers.
The big issue, Director Monahan reported, is the City's proposal to purchase the Orange
County Fairgrounds from the state. The City Council voted unanimously on the decision
during a closed- session meeting. City Manager Allan Roeder, Council members Katrina
Foley and Gary Monahan delivered a proposal for buying the Fairgrounds to Sacramento.
President Schafer adjourned the meeting at 7:59 p.m.